Numerical Modelling of Graphite-Based Composite Thermal Energy Storage Unit: Effect of Numerical Variable

Abstract

Thermal energy storage (TES) systems have a great potential on the providing balance of energy demand/supply, while also contributing to net-zero emissions, a reduced carbon footprint, and a greener environment. Paraffin phase change materials have emerged as a prominent material for TES applications due to its potentially high energy storage density. However, their application is significantly limited by its low thermal conductivity values. This study introduces a composite structure for thermal energy storage, utilizing paraffin as the latent heat storage material and a graphite matrix to enhance thermal conductivity for solar energy and waste heat applications. The effects of various numerical variables of mushy zone parameter, the pressure-velocity coupling, the pressure discretization scheme, and the boundary condition on the melting performance of a PCM-based thermal energy storage system were investigated within an annular storage medium, extending beyond the literature. Simulations were performed using ANSYS-Fluent, employing the enthalpy-porosity technique. The validation of the study was ensured based on the experimental setup. The primary aim of the study was to identify the numerical variables that yield the most realistic results. It was found that most closely representation of the experimental/real conditions is 105 mushy zone constant, a Coupled algorithm for the pressure-velocity coupling, and PRESTO! for the pressure discretization scheme. However, numerical variable effect was not significantly notable for the paraffin-impregnated graphite matrix storage medium. Results also indicated that graphite constrained the motion of paraffin, resulting in a uniform and homogeneous temperature distribution. It is observed that differences in numerical parameters lead to variations (0.42-16.57%) in energy storage rates, considering melting/charging times and the final temperatures of the TES system.

Keywords

• Latent heat thermal energy storage
• Paraffin
• Graphite
• Phase change
• Enthalpy-Porosity technique

References

1. ANSYS Inc. (2013). Ansys Fluent Tutorial Guide. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/ansys-fluent-tutorial-guide-r-15/45961740 (Accessed: November 9, 2024)
2. Brent, A. D., Voller, V. R., & Reid, K. J. (1988). Enthalpy-porosity technique for modeling convection-diffusion phase change: Application to the melting of a pure metal. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407788808913615
3. Buonomo, B., Celik, H., Ercole, D., Manca, O., & Mobedi, M. (2019). Numerical study on latent thermal energy storage systems with aluminum foam in local thermal equilibrium. Applied Thermal Engineering, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113980
4. Cai, Y., Zhang, N., Yuan, Y., Zhong, W., & Yu, N. (2021). Multi-energy driven form-stable phase change materials based on SEBS and reduced graphene oxide aerogel. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 233, 111390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111390
5. Cano, D., Funéz, C., Rodriguez, L., Valverde, J. L., & Sanchez-Silva, L. (2016). Experimental investigation of a thermal storage system using phase change materials. Applied Thermal Engineering, 107, 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.169
6. Chakraborty, A., Noh, J., Mach, R., Shamberger, P., & Yu, C. (2022). Thermal energy storage composites with preformed expanded graphite matrix and paraffin wax for long-term cycling stability and tailored thermal properties. Journal of Energy Storage, 52, 104856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104856
7. Chinnasamy, V., Heo, J., Jung, S., Lee, H., & Cho, H. (2023). Shape stabilized phase change materials based on different support structures for thermal energy storage applications–A review. Energy, 262, 125463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125463
8. Dinçer, I., & Rosen, M. A (2002). Thermal Energy Storage Systems and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

9. Elakkiyadasan, R., Gavaskar, T., Murugapoopathi, S., Sathishkumar, N., Nagaraja, M., & Ganesh, K. (2022). Experimental investigation of PCM with added E-graphite and analysis of its thermal characteristics. Materials Today: Proceedings, 64, 1717–1720.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.493
10. Feng, Z., Li, Y., He, F., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, Z., He, R., Zhang, K., & Yang, W. (2020). Experimental and numerical simulation of phase change process for paraffin in three-dimensional graphene aerogel. Applied Thermal Engineering, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114773
11. Fteiti, M., & Alaidrous, A. (2020). Latent heat storage during melting and solidification of a phase change material (PCM) embedded with a porous matrix of high thermal conductivity. International Journal of Energy Engineering, 2020, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijee.20201001.01
12. Kang, S., Choi, J. Y., & Choi, S. (2019). Mechanism of heat transfer through porous media of inorganic intumescent coating in cone calorimeter testing. Polymers, 11(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11020221
13. Khatibi, M., Nemati-Farouji, R., Taheri, A., Kazemian, A., Ma, T., & Niazmand, H. (2021). Optimization and performance investigation of the solidification behavior of nano-enhanced phase change materials in triplex-tube and shell-and-tube energy storage units. Journal of Energy Storage, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.102055
14. Kumar, N., Shrivastava, A., & Chakraborty, P. R. (2024). Enhancing latent heat storage dynamics with expanded graphite foam: Myth vs. reality check through numerical and experimental investigations. Available at SSRN, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4867508
15. Li, C., Li, Q., & Ge, R. (2022). Enhancement of melting performance in a shell and tube thermal energy storage device under different structures and materials. Applied Thermal Engineering, 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118701
16. Ling, Z., Chen, J., Xu, T., Fang, X., Gao, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Thermal conductivity of an organic phase change material/expanded graphite composite across the phase change temperature range and a novel thermal conductivity model. Energy Conversion and Management, 102, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.040
17. Liu, W., Bie, Y., Xu, T., Cichon, A., Królczyk, G., & Li, Z. (2022). Heat transfer enhancement of latent heat thermal energy storage in solar heating system: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Energy Storage, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103727
18. Mhiri, H., Jemni, A., & Sammouda, H. (2020). Numerical and experimental investigations of melting process of composite material (nanoPCM/carbon foam) used for thermal energy storage. Journal of Energy Storage, 29, 101167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101167
19. Mitali, J., Dhinakaran, S., & Mohamad, A. A. (2022). Energy storage systems: a review. Energy Storage and Savings, 1, 166–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss.2022.07.002
20. Mitincik, S., & Yazici, M. Y. (2023). Numerical study on the thermal energy storage performance of graphite matrix composite with phase change in shell-in-tube: Effects of bulk density and wall temperature. Journal of Energy Storage, 72, 108304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108304
21. Mitincik, S., & Yazici, M. Y. (2024). Numerical modelling and experimental validation on the discharging performance of paraffin/graphite matrix composite with various configurations of bulk density and wall temperature. Journal of Energy Storage, 89, 111704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.111704
22. Muraleedharan Nair, A., Wilson, C., Kamkari, B., Locke, J., Jun Huang, M., Griffiths, P., & Hewitt, N. J. (2024). Advancing thermal performance in PCM-Based energy Storage: A comparative study with Fins, expanded Graphite, and combined configurations. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 23(May), 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100627
23. Nair, A. M., Wilson, C., Huang, M. J., Griffiths, P., Hewitt, N., Singh, D., Buddhi, D., & Karthick, A. (2023). Phase change materials in building integrated space heating and domestic hot water applications: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 54(May), 44–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105227
24. Opolot, M., Zhao, C., Liu, M., Mancin, S., Bruno, F., & Hooman, K. (2020). Influence of cascaded graphite foams on thermal performance of high temperature phase change material storage systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 180, 115618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115618
25. Pourakabar, A., & Rabienataj Darzi, A. A. (2019). Enhancement of phase change rate of PCM in cylindrical thermal energy storage. Applied Thermal Engineering, 150, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.009
26. Singh, D., Buddhi, D., & Karthick, A. (2023). Productivity enhancement of solar still through heat transfer enhancement techniques in latent heat storage system: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(1), 44–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23964
27. Song, Y., Zhang, N., Jing, Y., Cao, X., Yuan, Y., & Haghighat, F. (2019). Experimental and numerical investigation on dodecane/expanded graphite shape-stabilized phase change material for cold energy storage. Energy, 189.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116175
28. Tong, X., Li, N., Zeng, M., & Wang, Q. (2019). Organic phase change materials confined in carbon-based materials for thermal properties enhancement: Recent advancement and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 108, 398–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.031
29. Tu, J., Yeoh, G. H., & Liu, C. (2018). Computational Fluid Dynamics: A practical approach. Butterworth-Heinemann.
30. Versteeg, H. K., & Malalasekra, W. (2007). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Pearson.
31. Voller, V. R., & Prakash, C. (1987). A fixed grid numerical modelling methodology for convection-diffusion mushy region phase-change problems. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 30, 1709–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(87)90317-6
32. Wu, S., Yan, T., Kuai, Z., & Pan, W. (2020). Experimental and numerical study of modified expanded graphite/hydrated salt phase change material for solar energy storage. Solar Energy, 205, 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.052
33. Yazici, M. Y. (2022). The effect of a new design preheating unit integrated to graphite matrix composite with phase change battery thermal management in low-temperature environment: An experimental study. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 29, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101244
34. Yazici, M. Y., Saglam, M., Aydin, O., & Avci, M. (2021). Thermal energy storage performance of PCM/graphite matrix composite in a tube-in-shell geometry. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100915
35. Zhao, B., Li, C., Jin, Y., Yang, C., Leng, G., Cao, H., Li, Y., & Ding, Y. (2016). Heat transfer performance of thermal energy storage components containing composite phase change materials. IET Renewable Power Generation, 10, 1515–1522. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0026
36. Zhao, C., Opolot, M., Liu, M., Bruno, F., Mancin, S., & Hooman, K. (2021). Phase change behaviour study of PCM tanks partially filled with graphite foam. Applied Thermal Engineering, 196, 117313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117313