Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Rootstocks on Fruit Weight During Post-Harvest Controlled Storage of Watermelon

Abstract

Grafted seedlings are used not only for protection from soil-borne diseases but also to increase tolerance to abiotic stress conditions, improve fruit quality and increase nutrient uptake in the soil. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of different watermelon rootstocks on weight loss of watermelon fruits, which were obtained at deficit irrigation levels and they were stored under controlled conditions for different periods. For this purpose, 2 citron watermelons, 1 open bottle gourd and 1 hybrid TZ-148 which is widely used for watermelon in Turkey were used as rootstock. The "Crimson Tide" commercial cultivar was grafted onto these rootstocks and non-grafted applications were used as control lots. 5 different irrigation levels were applied according to the plant pan coefficient such as kcp1 = 1.00 (I100), kcp2 = 0.75 (I75), kcp3 = 0.50 (I50), kcp4 = 0.33 (I33) and kcp5 = 0.00 (I0) non-irrigated. According to the results, all watermelon rootstocks caused by less fruit weight loss compared to non-grafted applications and it has been demonstrated that using grafted rootstocks is an advantage in watermelons to be stored. On the other hand, TZ-148 commercial rootstock and citron melon 1 rootstock determined as the best rootstock in post-harvest storage. The I100 and I75 irrigation levels have approximately the same weight loss.

Keywords

• Citron melon
• deficit irrigation
• watermelon storage
• bottle gourd
• TZ-148

References

1. Aras V, Özdemir AE, Yetişir H, Çandır E, Güler Z, Aslan. ... & Ünlü M, 2015. Changes in quality parameters in varieties of 'Crimson Tide' grafted watermelons under exhibiting conditions. Horticulture Cultures Research Station. 9.
2. Bacon MA, 2004. Water use efficiency in plant biology. Blackwell. pp. 1–26.
3. Bruton BD, Fish WW, Roberts W, Popham TW, 2009. The influence of rootstock selection on fruit quality attributes of watermelon. Open Food Sci J. 3: 15-34.
4. FAO, 2017. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Date of access: 13.12.2019.
5. Gerster H, 1997. The potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Amer. College Nutr. 16: 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.1997.10718661
6. Giovannucci E, 2002. A review of epidemiologic studies of tomatoes. lycopene. and prostate cancer. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood.) 227: 852-859.
7. Huh YC, Solmaz I, Sari N, 2008. Morphological characterization of Korean and Turkish watermelon germplasm. In: Pitrat M (ed): Cucurbitaceae 2008. Proceedings of the IXth EUCARPIA meeting on genetics and breeding of Cucurbitaceae. Avignon (France). May 21-24th. 327-33.
8. Leskovar DI, Bang H, Crosby KM, Maness N, Franco JA, Perkins-Veazie P, 2004. Lycopene. carbohydrates. ascorbic acid and yield components of diploid and triploid watermelon cultivars are affected by deficit irrigation. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 79: 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2004.11511739

9. Naz A, Butt MS, Sultan MT, Qayyum MMN, Niaz RS, 2014. Watermelon lycopene and allied health claims. EXCLI Journal. 13: 650.
10. Oda M, 2004. Grafting of vegetable to improve greenhouse production. Bull. National.
11. Özdemir AE, Çandır E, Yetişir H, Aras V, Arslan Ö, Baltaer Ö.. ... & Ünlü M, 2018. Rootstocks Affected Postharvest Performance of Grafted ‘Crisby’ and ‘Crimson Tide’Watermelon Cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 24 (4): 453-462.
12. Özmen S, Kanber R, Sarı N, Ünlü M, 2015. The effects of deficit irrigation on nitrogen consumption. yield. and quality in drip-irrigated grafted and ungrafted watermelon. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 14 (5): 966-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60870-4
13. Pachauri RK, Meyer LA, Team CW, 2015. IPCC. 2014: climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I. II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. J. Roman. Stud. Switz. 4: 85–88.
14. Perkins-Veazie P, Collins JK, Clevidence B, Wu G, 2007. Watermelons and health. Acta Horticulturae: 731. 121.
15. Sensoy S, Ertek A, Gedik I, Kucukyumuk C, 2007. Irrigation frequency and amount affect yield and quality of field-grown melon (Cucumis melo L.). Agricultural Water Management. 88: (1-3). 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.10.015
16. Tong BC, Barbul A, 2004. Cellular and physiological effects of arginine. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 4: 823-832.
17. Wisser D, Frolking S, Douglas EM, Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ, Schumann AH, 2008. Global irrigation water demand: variability and uncertainties arising from agricultural and climate data sets. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35: 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035296.
18. Yavuz D, Seymen M, Yavuz N, Türkmen Ö, 2015. Effects of irrigation interval and quantity on the yield and quality of confectionary pumpkin grown under field conditions. Agricultural Water Management. 159: 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.025
19. Yetisir H. Sarı N. 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth. yield and quality of watermelon. Australian Journal of Exper. Agriculture. 43: 1269-1274. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02095
20. Yetişir H, Sari N, 2018. Fruit and Seed Yields of Watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai] Grafted onto Different Bottle Gourd (Lagenarai siceraria Molina Standl.) Rootstocks. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry. 1-9. DOI: 10.9734/AJRAF/2018/41245
21. Yoosefzadeh Najafabadi M, Soltani F, Noory H, Díaz-Pérez JC, 2018. Growth. yield and enzyme activity response of watermelon accessions exposed to irrigation water deficit. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 24 (4): 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2017.1419329.