The Effect of Fill Rate on Mechanical Properties of PLA Printed Samples

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printers are a rapidly developing technology used in many fields today. Polylactic acid (PLA) is one of the most researched and used biodegradable polymers to date. PLA stands out as a biomaterial in other industries due to its many benefits, as it replaces conventional petrochemical-based polymers. The main purpose of this study is; to investigate the effect of different fill rates (5%, 50% and 100%) on the mechanical properties of samples produced from PLA in 3D printers. For each filling ratio, 5 samples were produced for bending test defined by ASTM D-790 standard and tensile tests defined by ASTM D-638 standard. In this study, it is aimed to model a printer producing with stacking technology and to compare the effects of occupancy rate on mechanical properties in the modeled 3D printer.

Keywords

• 3D printer
• polylactic acid (PLA)
• fused deposition modeling

References

1. ASTM, 1989. D 638. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastic (metric). American Society for Testing and Materials Standard.
2. ASTM, 2003. D 790–03. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. American Society for Testing and Materials Standard.
3. Bellini A, Güçeri S, 2003. Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 9(4): 252–264.
4. Çelebi A, Demirdal S, Akbulut M, 2017. Influence of fill rates on the mechanical properties of polylacticacid (PLA) specimen produced by 3D printing. International Symposium on 3D Printing Technologies, 3-4 April 2017, Karabük.
5. Evlen H, Erel G, Yılmaz E, 2018. Investigation on the effect of the open and closed systems, Journal of Polytechnic, 21(3), 651-662.
6. Evlen H, Özdemir MA, Çalışkan A, 2019. Effects of filling percentage on mechanical properties of PLA and PET materials. Journal of Polytechnic, 22(4), 1031-1037.
7. Fodran E, Koch M, Menon U, 1996. Mechanical and dimensional characteristics of fused deposition modeling build styles, International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1996, California.
8. Günay M, Gündüz S, Yılmaz H, Yaşar N, Kaçar R, 2020. Optimization of 3D printing operation parameters for tensile strength PLA based sample, Journal of Polytechnic, 23(1), 73-79.

9. Montero M, Roundy S, Odell D, Ahn SH, Wright PK, 2001. Material characterization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) ABS by designed experiments. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 10 13552540210441166.
10. Öz Ö, Aydın M, Kara AS, Sancak MS, 2018. Determınatıon of the infill ratio effect on the failure loads of the printed parts, International Journal Of 3D Printing Technologies And Digital Industry, 2(1), 32-39.
11. Puebla K, Arcaute K, Quintana R, Wicker RB, 2012. Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type I specimens manufactured via stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 18(5), 374-388.
12. Schöppner V, KTP KP, 2011. Mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts manufactured with Ultem 9085. In Proceedings of 69th Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers, 7(2):1294-1298.
13. Ziemian C, Sharma M, Ziemian S, 2012. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Mechanical engineering, 23. 159-180.