Karyotype Analysis of Two Varieties of Paronychia amani (Caryophyllaceae, Paronychioideae)

Year 2021, , 1809 - 1816, 01.09.2021

Halil Erhan Eroğlu , Derya Altay Ümit Budak , Esra Martin

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.823483

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The chromosome number and karyotype analysis of Paroncyhia amani var. amani and P. amani var. minutiflora are described for the first time. The diploid chromosome numbers and karyotype formulae are 2n = 4x = 36 = 32m + 4sm in taxa. The karyotypes are symmetrical type including metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes. The small chromosomes varied from 0.96 μm (var. amani) to 2.74 μm (var. minutiflora). P. amani var. amani and P. amani var. minutiflora are very little different varieties morphologically. There are some similarities between varieties in the karyological data. (i) equal number of chromosomes, (ii) same karyotype formula, (iii) very close karyotype asymmetry values, (iv) polyploidy by ploidy level of 4x. These seem to support morphological closeness.

Keywords

Chromosome, karyotype asymmetry, Paronychia amani, Turkey

Supporting Institution

Yozgat Bozok University

Project Number

6601-FBE/17-74

Thanks

This work was supported by Yozgat Bozok University, Scientific Research Projects Fund with project number 6601-FBE/17-74.

References

• Baltisberger M, Hörandl E, 2016. Karyotype Evolution Supports the Molecular Phylogeny in the Genus Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 18: 1-14.
• Bittrich V, 1993. Caryophyllaceae. in: Kubitzki K, Rohwer J, Bittrich V, The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Magnoliid, Hamamelid, and Caryophyllid Families, Vol. 2. Springer, pp. 206-236, Berlin-Germany.
• Blackburn KB, Morton, JK, 1957. The Incidence of Polyploidy in the Caryophyllaceae of Britain and of Portugal. New Phytologist, 56: 344-351.
• Chaudhri MN, 1967. Paronychia Mill. in: Davis PH, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 2. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 250-262, Edinburgh-Scotland.
• Chaudri MN, 1968. A Revision of the Paronychinae. Tilburg H. Gianotten, Utrecht-Netherlands.
• Diosdado JC, Pastor J, 1994. Estudio Cariologico del Gĕnero Paronychia Miller (Caryophyllaceae) en Andalucĭa (Espana). Acta Botanica Malacitana, 19: 89-95.
• Elçi Ş, Sancak C, 2013. Sitogenetikte Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Gözlemler. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınevi, Ankara-Türkiye.
• Eroğlu HE, 2015. Which Chromosomes Are Subtelocentric or Acrocentric? A New Karyotype Symmetry/Asymmetry Index. Caryologia, 68: 239-245.
• Eroğlu HE, Altay D, Budak Ü, Martin E, 2020. Karyotypic Phylogeny and Polyploidy Variations of Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae) Taxa in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 44(3): 245-254.
• Eroğlu HE, Budak Ü, 2020. Karyotype Analysis of Paronychia anatolica subsp. anatolica (Caryophyllaceae, Paronychioideae). Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(4): 2424-2430.
• Eroğlu HE, Doğan H, Altay D, Budak Ü, 2017. The Medicinal Plant of Genus Paronychia and the Karyotype Analysis of Paronychia adalia. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, 4(3): 103-107.
• Hartman RL, 1972. Paronychia pulvinata - P. sessiliflora: A Cytological and Chemical Study. Journal of the Colorado-Wyoming Academy of Science, 7(2-3): 102.
• Hartman RL, 1974. Rocky Mountain Species of Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae). A Morphological, Cytological, and Chemical Study. Brittonia, 26(3): 256-263.
• Küpfer P, 1980. Contribution à la Cytotaxonomie de Quelques Orophytes Iraniens. Revue de Biologie et d'Écologie Mediterranéenne, 7: 37-48.
• Levan AK, Fredga K, Sandberg AA, 1964. Nomenclature for Centromeric Position on Chromosomes. Hereditas, 52: 201-220.
• Lorenzo Andreu A, García Sanz MP, 1950. Cromosomas Somáticos de Plantas Espontáneas en la Estepa de Aragón. II. Anales de la Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, 2: 12-63.
• Löve Á, 1975. IOPB Chromosome Number Reports XLIX. Taxon, 24: 501-516.
• Martin E, Kahraman A, Dirmenci T, Bozkurt H, Eroğlu HE, 2020. Karyotype Evolution and New Chromosomal Data in Erodium: Chromosome Alteration, Polyploidy, Dysploidy, and Symmetrical Karyotypes. Turkish Journal of Botany, 44(3): 255-268.
• Paszko B, 2006. A Critical Review and a New Proposal of Karyotype Asymmetry Indices. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 258: 39-48.
• Peruzzi L, Eroğlu HE, 2013. Karyotype Asymmetry: Again, How to Measure and What to Measure? Comparative Cytogenetics, 7: 1-9.
• Runemark H, 1996. Mediterranean Chromosome Number Reports 6 (590-678). Flora Mediterranea, 6: 223-243.
• Stebbins GL, 1971. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold, London-England.
• Suda J, Kyncl T, Freiova R, 2003. Nuclear DNA Amounts in Macaronesian Angiosperms. Annals of Botany, 92: 153-164.