An Attempt to Evaluate the Performance Parameters of a Precision Vacuum Seeder in Different Seed Drop Height

Abstract

This study examined the effects of seed drop height changing depending on furrow openers of precision seeders, and the forward speed of tractors which is constantly aimed to be increased by producers on the uniformity of seed distribution. The experiments were made with a precision seeder unit positioned on a sticky belt trial setup at seed drop heights of 100, 200 and 300 mm, the forward speeds of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 m s-1, and the vacuum pressures of 6.0, 7.5, and 9.0 kPa. Maize and sunflower seeds were used in experiments. According to the results, the effects of seed drop height and forward speed on seed spacing and deviation from row were significant for both seed types (P<0.01). The increase in the forward speed led to a deviation of approximately 15 mm in maize and 17 mm in sunflower between the mean seed spacing and the target seed spacing. In general, miss and multiple indices were found to be fewer than 9%. The optimum performance of the seeder unit in sowing sunflower and maize was obtained at the seed drop height of 100 mm, the forward speed of 0.5 m s-1, and the vacuum pressure of 9.0 kPa. Consequently, it is suggested that, in contrast to what is demanded, the forward speed cannot be increased as much as one desires, and the dimensions of furrow openers that changed depending on the seed drop height should be designed under certain standards.

Keywords

• Forward speed
• furrow opener
• vacuum pressure
• maize
• sunflower

Project Number

2017-FBE-A07

References

1. ASAE Standard. 2005. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). Cubes, Pellets, and Crumbles—Definitions and Methods for Determining Density, Durability, and Moisture Content, ASAE S269.4 DEC01. St. Joseph Mich. USA.
2. Bakhtiari MR, Ahmad D, 2017. Design of a vacuum seed metering system for kenaf planting. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 19(3): 23-31.
3. Breece HE, Hansen HV, Hoerner TA, 1981. Planting. Fundamentals of machine operation series, Deere and Co., Moline, Ill. 34–37.
4. Brooks D, Church B, 1987. Drill performance assessment: a changed approach. British Sugar Beet Review, 55(4): 50-51.
5. Çay A, Kocabiyik H, Karaaslan B, May S, Khurelbaatar M, 2017. Development of an opto-electronic measurement system for planter laboratory tests. Measurement, 102: 90-95. doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.060.
6. Hofman V, 1988. Maximum yields need accurate planting. The Sunflower, 14(1): 10-11.
7. Hollowell, W., 1992. Drill performance assessments. British Sugar Beet Review, 50(3): 13-15.
8. ISO, 1984. Sowing Equipment – Test Methods. Part I: Single Seed Drills, 7256/1.

9. Ivancan S, Sito S, Fabijanic G, 2004. Effect of precision drill operating speed on the intra-row seed distribution for parsley. Biosystems Engineering, 89(3): 373-376.
10. Jasa, P.J. and Dickey, E.C., 1982. Tillage factors affecting corn seed spacing. Transactions of the ASAE, 25(6): 1516-1519.
11. Kachman SD, Smith JA, 1995. Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Transactions of the ASAE, 38(2): 379 – 387. doi: 10.13031/2013.27843
12. Karayel D, Özmerzi A, 2001. Effect of forward speed and seed spacing on seeding uniformity of a precision vacuum metering unit for melon and cucumber seeds. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 14(2): 63-67.
13. Kocher MF, Lan Y, Chen C, Smith JA, 1998. Opto – electronic sensor system for rapid evaluation of planter seed spacing uniformity. Transactions of the ASAE, 41(1): 237 – 245. doi: 10.13031/2013.17143
14. Koller A, Wan Y, Miller E, Weckler P, Taylor R, 2014. Test method for precision seed singulation systems. Transactions of the ASABE, 57(5): 1283-1290. doi 10.13031/trans.57.10466
15. Navid H, Ebrahimian S, Gassemzadeh HR, Mousavi nia MJ, 2011. Laboratory evaluation of seed metering device using image processing method. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2(1): 1-4.
16. Nielsen RL, 1995. Planting speed effects on stand establishment and grain yield of corn. Journal of Production Agriculture, 8: 391-393. doi.org/10.2134/jpa1995.0391
17. Parish RL, Bergeron PE, Bracy RP, 1991. Comparison of vacuum and belt seeders for vegetable planting. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 7(5): 537-540. doi: 10.13031/2013.26264
18. Parish RL, Bracy RP, 2003. An attempt to improve uniformity of a gaspardo precision seeder. Horttechnology, 13(1): 100-103. doi: 10.21273/horttech.13.1.0100
19. Singh RC, Singh G, Saraswat DC, 2005. Optimizing of design and operational parameters of pneumatic seed metering device for planting cottonseeds. Biosystem Engineering, 92(4): 429 – 438. doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.07.002
20. Yazgı A, Degirmencioglu A, 2014. Measurement of seed spacing uniformity performance of a precision metering unit as function of the number of holes on vacuum plate. Measurement 56: 128–135.
21. Yin X, Noguchi N, Yang T, Jin C, 2018. Development and evaluation of a low-cost precision seeding control system for a corn drill. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11(5): 95-99. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20181105.3369