Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Determination of Some Soil Characteristics Depending on Conventional and Reduced Tillage Circumstances

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 4, 51 - 61, 31.12.2017

Abstract

In this study, moisture content of soil, soil resistance, bulk density of soil, and soil porosity values

were identified depending on circumstances before tillage process by conventional and reduced tillage methods.

Distribution of soil particle size, mean weight based diameter of soil particles, and the change in roughness rate

of field surface were also determined based on traditional and reduced tillage methods. Trials were conducted

according to factorial regulation in randomized parcels. According to results of the study, the lowest bulk density

and the highest porosity were obtained from reduced tillage method. Tillage method very significantly (P<0.01)

influenced roughness rate. Particles with greater diameter were obtained in conventional tillage method in terms of

mean weighted diameter. Compression ratio of soil arising from tillage method generally increased more in reduced

tillage method. The lowest penetration resistance was obtained in reduced tillage with 0.08 MPa, the highest value

was obtained in the uncultivated area with 2.56 MPa.

References

  • Adam KM, Erbach DC, 1992. Secondary tillage tool effect on soil aggregation. Transactions of the ASAE 35(6), 1771- 1776.
  • Ahmad D, 1983. Rotary tillage-past and present. Pertentika, 6: 55-67.
  • Anonim, 2013. T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Erzurum Bölge Müdürlüğü Raporları.
  • Anonymous, 1974. Standart test method for particle size analysis of soil. American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Philadelphia.
  • Bauder JW, Randall GW, Schuler RT, 1985. Effects of tillage with controlled wheel traffic on properties and root growth of corn. J. Soil Water Conser. 49: 382-385.
  • Bouaziz A, Bruckler L, 1989. Modeling wheat seedling growth and emergence: I. Seedling growth affected by soil water potential. Soil Soc. Am. J. 53: 1832-1838.
  • Braunack MV, 1995. Effect aggregate size and soil water content on emergence of soybean (glycine max, L. merr.) and maize (zea mays, L.). Soil and Tillage Research, 33: 149-161.
  • Busscher WJ, Sojka RE, 1987. Enhancemant of subsoiling effect on soil strength by conservational tillage. Transactions of the ASAE, 30(4): 888-892.
  • Çarman K, 1997. Effect of different tillage systems on soil properties and wheat yield in Middle Anatolia. Soil & Tillage Research 40: 201-207.
  • Dan HL, 1963. The effect of tillage operations on bulk density and other physical properties of the soil. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Library, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 191 s.
  • Eghball B, Mielke LN, Calvo GA, Wilhelm WW, 1993. Fractal description of soil fragmentation for various tillage methods and crop sequences. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57: 1337-1341.
  • Erbach DC, 1987. Measurement of soil bulk density and moisture. Transactions of the ASAE 30(4): 922-929.
  • Guillobez S, Arnaud M, 1998. Regionalized soil roughness indices. Soil&Tillage Research, 45: 419–432.
  • Harris RF, Chester G, Allen ON, 1966. Dynamics of soil aggregation. In Advances in Agron., 18. edition A. G. Norman, 107-169. New York: Academic Press.
  • Jain NK, Agrawal JP, 1970. Effect of clod size in the seedbed on development and yield of sugarcane. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 34: 795-797.
  • Johnson WH, Taylor GS, 1960. Tillage treatment for corn on clay soils. Transactions of the ASAE 3(2): 4-7.
  • Krause R, Lorez R, Hoogmood WB, 1984. Soil tillage in the tropics and subtropics, Duetsche Gesellschaft fur Zusamminarbeit, Germany. 319 p.
  • Lal R, Mahboubi AA, Fausey NR, 1994. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a central Ohio soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 517–522.
  • Logsdon SD, Parker JC, Reneau RB, 1987. Root growth as influenced by agregate size. Plant and Soil, 99: 267-275.
  • Lyles L, Woodruff NP, 1962. How moisture and tillage affect cloddiness for wind erosion control. Agric. Eng., 42(3): 150-153.
  • Ojeniyi SO, Dexter AR, 1979. Soil factors affecting the macrostructure produced by tillage. Transactions of the ASAE 22(2): 339-343.
  • Önal İ, 2011. Ekim Bakım Gübreleme Makinaları. IV. Baskı, İzmir. 611 s.
  • Raney WA, Zingg AW, 1957. Principles of tillage. The Yearbook of Agriculture. USD A, Washington, DC.
  • Richard G, Cousin I, Sillon JF, Bruand A, Gue’rif J, 2001. Effect of compaction on the porosity of a silty soil: Influence on unsaturated hydraulic properties. Eur. J. Soil. Sci. 52: 49-58.
  • Romkens MJM, Wang JY, 1987. Soil roughness changes from rainfall. Transaction of the ASAE 30(1): 101-107.
  • Russell EW, 1961. Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. London: Longmans, Green & Company.
  • Saleh A, 1993. Soil surface roughness measurement: chain method. J. Soil Water Conserv., 48: 527–529.
  • Say SM, Işık A, 1996. Penetrasyon direncinin toprak koşulları ile değişiminin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. 6. Uluslar Arası Tarımsal Mekanizasyon ve Enerji Kongresi, Ankara.
  • Skidmore EL, Layton JB, 1992. Dry soil aggregate stability as influenced by selected soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(2): 557-561.
  • Şeker C, 1999. Penetrasyon direnci ile bazı toprak özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(3): 583–588.
  • Şeker C, Işıldar AA, 2000. Tarla trafiğinin toprak profilindeki gözenekliliğe ve sıkıştırmaya etkisi. Turk J. Agriculture and Forestry, 24: 71-77.
  • Ülger P, Güzel E, Kayışoğlu B, Eker B, Akdemir B, Pınar Y, Bayhan Y, Sağlam C, 2002. Tarım Makinaları İlkeleri. T.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı, No: 29. Fakülteler Matbaası, 2. Baskı İstanbul. 435 s.
  • Yavuzcan HG, 2000. Wheel traffic impact on soil conditions as influenced by tillage system in Central Anatolia. Soil & Tillage Research 54: 129-138.
  • Zhang S, Grip H, Lövdahl L, 2006. Effect of soil compaction on hydraulic properties of two loess in China. Soil & Tillage Research 90: 117-125.

Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 4, 51 - 61, 31.12.2017

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemleri ile toprak işleme öncesi şartlara bağlı
olarak toprağın nem içeriği, toprak direnci, toprağın hacim ağırlığı ve toprak porozitesi değerleri saptanmıştır.
Ayrıca geleneksel ve azaltılmış toprak işleme yöntemlerine bağlı olarak toprak parçacık büyüklük dağılımı, toprak
parçacıklarının ortalama ağırlıklı çapı ve tarla yüzey pürüzlülük oranının değişimi belirlenmiştir. Denemeler tesadüf
parselleri deneme desenine göre yürütülmüştür. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, en düşük hacim ağırlığı ve en yüksek
porozite değerleri azaltılmış toprak işleme yönteminde elde edilmiştir. Toprak işleme yöntemi, pürüzlülük oranını
çok önemli düzeyde (P<0.01) etkilemiştir. Ortalama ağırlıklı çap bakımından geleneksel toprak işleme yönteminde
daha büyük çaplı parçacıklar elde edilmiştir. Toprak işleme yönteminden kaynaklanan toprağın sıkışma oranı, genel
olarak azaltılmış toprak işleme yönteminde daha fazla artış göstermiştir. En düşük penetrasyon direnci değeri 0.08
MPa ile azaltılmış toprak işlemede, en büyük değer ise 2.56 MPa ile işlenmemiş alanda elde edilmiştir.

References

  • Adam KM, Erbach DC, 1992. Secondary tillage tool effect on soil aggregation. Transactions of the ASAE 35(6), 1771- 1776.
  • Ahmad D, 1983. Rotary tillage-past and present. Pertentika, 6: 55-67.
  • Anonim, 2013. T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Erzurum Bölge Müdürlüğü Raporları.
  • Anonymous, 1974. Standart test method for particle size analysis of soil. American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Philadelphia.
  • Bauder JW, Randall GW, Schuler RT, 1985. Effects of tillage with controlled wheel traffic on properties and root growth of corn. J. Soil Water Conser. 49: 382-385.
  • Bouaziz A, Bruckler L, 1989. Modeling wheat seedling growth and emergence: I. Seedling growth affected by soil water potential. Soil Soc. Am. J. 53: 1832-1838.
  • Braunack MV, 1995. Effect aggregate size and soil water content on emergence of soybean (glycine max, L. merr.) and maize (zea mays, L.). Soil and Tillage Research, 33: 149-161.
  • Busscher WJ, Sojka RE, 1987. Enhancemant of subsoiling effect on soil strength by conservational tillage. Transactions of the ASAE, 30(4): 888-892.
  • Çarman K, 1997. Effect of different tillage systems on soil properties and wheat yield in Middle Anatolia. Soil & Tillage Research 40: 201-207.
  • Dan HL, 1963. The effect of tillage operations on bulk density and other physical properties of the soil. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Library, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 191 s.
  • Eghball B, Mielke LN, Calvo GA, Wilhelm WW, 1993. Fractal description of soil fragmentation for various tillage methods and crop sequences. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57: 1337-1341.
  • Erbach DC, 1987. Measurement of soil bulk density and moisture. Transactions of the ASAE 30(4): 922-929.
  • Guillobez S, Arnaud M, 1998. Regionalized soil roughness indices. Soil&Tillage Research, 45: 419–432.
  • Harris RF, Chester G, Allen ON, 1966. Dynamics of soil aggregation. In Advances in Agron., 18. edition A. G. Norman, 107-169. New York: Academic Press.
  • Jain NK, Agrawal JP, 1970. Effect of clod size in the seedbed on development and yield of sugarcane. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 34: 795-797.
  • Johnson WH, Taylor GS, 1960. Tillage treatment for corn on clay soils. Transactions of the ASAE 3(2): 4-7.
  • Krause R, Lorez R, Hoogmood WB, 1984. Soil tillage in the tropics and subtropics, Duetsche Gesellschaft fur Zusamminarbeit, Germany. 319 p.
  • Lal R, Mahboubi AA, Fausey NR, 1994. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a central Ohio soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 517–522.
  • Logsdon SD, Parker JC, Reneau RB, 1987. Root growth as influenced by agregate size. Plant and Soil, 99: 267-275.
  • Lyles L, Woodruff NP, 1962. How moisture and tillage affect cloddiness for wind erosion control. Agric. Eng., 42(3): 150-153.
  • Ojeniyi SO, Dexter AR, 1979. Soil factors affecting the macrostructure produced by tillage. Transactions of the ASAE 22(2): 339-343.
  • Önal İ, 2011. Ekim Bakım Gübreleme Makinaları. IV. Baskı, İzmir. 611 s.
  • Raney WA, Zingg AW, 1957. Principles of tillage. The Yearbook of Agriculture. USD A, Washington, DC.
  • Richard G, Cousin I, Sillon JF, Bruand A, Gue’rif J, 2001. Effect of compaction on the porosity of a silty soil: Influence on unsaturated hydraulic properties. Eur. J. Soil. Sci. 52: 49-58.
  • Romkens MJM, Wang JY, 1987. Soil roughness changes from rainfall. Transaction of the ASAE 30(1): 101-107.
  • Russell EW, 1961. Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. London: Longmans, Green & Company.
  • Saleh A, 1993. Soil surface roughness measurement: chain method. J. Soil Water Conserv., 48: 527–529.
  • Say SM, Işık A, 1996. Penetrasyon direncinin toprak koşulları ile değişiminin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. 6. Uluslar Arası Tarımsal Mekanizasyon ve Enerji Kongresi, Ankara.
  • Skidmore EL, Layton JB, 1992. Dry soil aggregate stability as influenced by selected soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(2): 557-561.
  • Şeker C, 1999. Penetrasyon direnci ile bazı toprak özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(3): 583–588.
  • Şeker C, Işıldar AA, 2000. Tarla trafiğinin toprak profilindeki gözenekliliğe ve sıkıştırmaya etkisi. Turk J. Agriculture and Forestry, 24: 71-77.
  • Ülger P, Güzel E, Kayışoğlu B, Eker B, Akdemir B, Pınar Y, Bayhan Y, Sağlam C, 2002. Tarım Makinaları İlkeleri. T.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı, No: 29. Fakülteler Matbaası, 2. Baskı İstanbul. 435 s.
  • Yavuzcan HG, 2000. Wheel traffic impact on soil conditions as influenced by tillage system in Central Anatolia. Soil & Tillage Research 54: 129-138.
  • Zhang S, Grip H, Lövdahl L, 2006. Effect of soil compaction on hydraulic properties of two loess in China. Soil & Tillage Research 90: 117-125.
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Biyosistem Mühendisliği / Biosystem Engineering
Authors

Emrah Kuş

Yıldıran Yıldırım This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2017
Submission Date June 5, 2017
Acceptance Date July 10, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 7 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Kuş, E., & Yıldırım, Y. (2017). Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 7(4), 51-61.
AMA Kuş E, Yıldırım Y. Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. December 2017;7(4):51-61.
Chicago Kuş, Emrah, and Yıldıran Yıldırım. “Geleneksel Ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 7, no. 4 (December 2017): 51-61.
EndNote Kuş E, Yıldırım Y (December 1, 2017) Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 7 4 51–61.
IEEE E. Kuş and Y. Yıldırım, “Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi”, J. Inst. Sci. and Tech., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 51–61, 2017.
ISNAD Kuş, Emrah - Yıldırım, Yıldıran. “Geleneksel Ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 7/4 (December 2017), 51-61.
JAMA Kuş E, Yıldırım Y. Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2017;7:51–61.
MLA Kuş, Emrah and Yıldıran Yıldırım. “Geleneksel Ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, 2017, pp. 51-61.
Vancouver Kuş E, Yıldırım Y. Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşleme Şartlarına Bağlı Olarak Bazı Toprak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2017;7(4):51-6.