Effects of Different Humic Acid Doses on Yield and Quality Properties of Corn (Zea mays L.) in Iraq-Sulaymaniyah Conditions

Year 2023, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 1377 - 1393, 01.06.2023

Tamer Eryiğit Aso Hashm Husamalddin

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1241745

Abstract

The research was carried out in the ecological conditions of the Ranya region of Sulaymaniyah province, Iraq in the summer growing season of 2020. The goal of the study was to investigate the impact of humic acid on the growth and yield of corn. The trial included two commercial cultivars (DKC6050 and DKC6664) and soil application of four rates of humic acid (HA1: 0 kg/ha, HA2: 60 kg/ha, HA3: 120 kg/ha and HA4: 180 kg/ha). The experiment was conducted according to the split-plot experimental design in randomized blocks. In the study, a trial pattern was designed so that varieties were placed in the main plots, and doses of humic acid were placed in the subplots for a more precise investigation of their effects on the cultivars. In the experiment, the characteristics of growth, yield, and yield components were examined. According to the results, it was determined that applying humic acid positively affected all vegetative and yield parameters except for the germination time, cob diameter, protein ratio, and oil ratio. As the result of the interaction between the cultivars and the humic acid doses, significant results were obtained for seed yield, 100 seeds weight, yield per plant, cob diameter, harvest index, leaf area index, stem diameter, and silk appearance time. The highest grain yield was obtained from the DKC6050 variety (9844.8 kg/ha). Responses of cultivars to humic acid were the same and therefore no appreciable differences were observed between cultivars for comparison. However, it has been determined that the DKC6050 variety is a promising variety in terms of many characteristics and can be cultivated in the ecology where the research is carried out.

Keywords

• Humic acid, • Quality properties, • Maize, • Organic fertilizer, • Yield

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

Yok

Thanks

-

References

• Ahmad, M., Ahmad, Z., Jamil, M., Nazli, F., Latif, M., Fakhar-U-Zaman, A. M., (2014). Integrated use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, biogas slurry and chemical nitrogen for sustainable production of maize under salt-affected conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 46(1): 375-382
• Alireza, S., (2012). Effect of humic substances on the quality of essential oils of medicinal plants. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 6(13).
• Aseres, M. E., Liu, A., Mwalupaso, G. E., (2019). Integration of humic acid with nitrogen wields an auxiliary impact on physiological traits, growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) varieties. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(3): 6681-6700.
• Asli, S., Neumann, P. M., (2010). Rhizosphere humic acid interacts with root cell walls to reduce hydraulic conductivity and plant development. Plant and Soil, 336(1): 313-322.
• Azeem, K., Khalil, S. K., Khan, F., Shahenshah, S., Qahar, A., Sharif, M., Zamin, M., (2014). Phenology, yield and yield components of maize as affected by humic acid and nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6(7): 286-293.
• Balbaa, M., Awad, A., (2013). Effect of humic acid and micronutrients foliar fertilization on yield, yield components and nutrients uptake of maize in calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Production, 4(5): 773-785.
• Banitamim, K., Shokuhfar, A., (2017). Influence different level of humic acid and irrigation regime on seed yield and morphological traits of corn under warm and dry climate condition. Journal of Crop Nutrition Science, 3(1): 1-13.
• Berbara, R. L. L., Garcia, A. C., (2014). Humic substances and plant defense metabolism. ın physiological mechanisms and adaptation strategies in plants under changing environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8591-9.
• Calvo, P., Nelson, L., Kloepper, J. W., (2014). Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil, 383(1-2): 3-41.
• Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., (2014). Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 1(1): 1-11.
• Çelik, H., Katkat, A. V., Aşik, B. B., Turan, M. A., (2010). Effects of humus on growth and nutrient uptake of maize under saline and calcareous soil conditions. Žemdırbystė-Agrıculture, 97(4): 15-22.
• Chang, E., Chung, R. S., Tsai, Y. H., (2007). Effect of different application rates of organic fertilizer on soil enzyme activity and microbial population. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 53(2): 132-140.
• Darrah, L. L., McMullen, M. D., Zuber, M. S., (2019). Breeding, genetics and seed corn production in corn. Chemistry and Technology, 9: 19-41.
• Daur, I., Bakhashwain, A. A., (2013). Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 45: 21-25.
• Dvies, G., Ghabbour, E., Khairy, K., (2012). Humic substances: Structures, properties and uses. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53354-8.00012-8.
• El-Saber, M. M., Gomaa, M. A., Radwan, F. I., Khalil, G. A. M., Kandil, E. E., El-Saber, M. M., (2014). Impact of humic acid application on productivity of some maize hybrids under water stress conditions. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(3): 668-673.
• El-Sahookie, M., (1990). Maize Production and Improvement. Ministry of higher education and scientific research - university of Baghdad.
• Eldardiry, E. I., Sabreen, K., Abd El Hady, M., (2012). Improving soil properties, maize yield components grown in sandy soil under irrigation testaments and humic acid application. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(7): 587-593.
• Ertani, A., Francioso, O., Tugnoli, V., Righi, V., Nardi, S., (2011). Effect of commercial lignosulfonate-humate on Zea mays L. metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(22): 11940-11948.
• Esmaili, S., Tadayyon, A., Tadayon, M., Alhossainy, M., (2016). Response of some quantitative and qualitative traits of cotton cultivars to foliar application of humic acid in saline soil. Journal of Oil Plants Production, 3(1): 1-14.
• Fan, H. M., Wang, X. W., Sun, X., Li, Y. Y., Sun, X. Z., Zheng, C. S., (2014). Effects of humic acid derived from sediments on growth, photosynthesis and chloroplast ultrastructure in chrysanthemum. Scientia Horticulturae, 177: 118-123.
• FAO, (2018). Faostat, Fao. Statistical databases faostat.fao.org.
• Gao, C., El-Sawah, A. M., Ismail Ali, D. F., Hamoud, Y. A., Shaghaleh, H., Sheteiwy, M. S., (2020). The integration of bio and organic fertilizers improve plant growth, grain yield, quality and metabolism of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy, 10(3): 1-25.
• García-Lara, S., Serna-Saldivar, S. O., (2019). Corn history and culture. Chemistry and Technology, 1: 1-18.
• Hassan, H., Huthily, K., Mohsen, K., (2019). Effect of humic acid and silicon on some growth characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.). Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(2): 23-32.
• Hussain, A., Mukhtiar, A., Subhanullah, Ali, W., Tariq, M., Muhammad, S., Khan, M. K., Owais-Khan, M., (2018). Impression of disparate levels of poultry manure and humic acid on the yield and yield traits of maize (Zea Mays L.). European Journal of Experimental Biology, 08(04): 342-351. Jahan, M., Nassiri, M., Amiri, M. B., (2019). The effect of humic acid and water super absorbent polymer application on sesame in an ecological cropping system: a new employment of structural equation modeling in agriculture. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 6(1): 1-15. Khaled, H., Fawy, H. A., (2011). Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Res., 6(1): 21-29.
• Khazaie, H. R., Eyshi, R. E., Bannayan, M., (2011). Application times and concentration of humic acid impact on aboveground biomass and oil production of hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis). Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, 5(20): 5148-5154.
• Kumar, D., Singh, V., (2018). Bioethanol Production from corn. Chemistry and Technology, 12: 615-631.
• Loy, D. D., Lundy, E. L., (2018). Nutritional properties and feeding value of corn and its coproducts. Chemistry and Technology, 3: 633-659.
• Maruf, M. T., Mam-Rasul, G. A., (2019). Effect of humic acid and sulfur fertilizer levels on some physıologıcal traits of maize (Zea mays L.) On calcareous soıl. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(6): 13199-13217.
• Moghadam, H. R. T., Khamene, M. K., Zahedi, H., (2014). Effect of humic acid foliar application on growth and quantity of corn in irrigation withholding at different growth stages. Maydica, 59(2): 124-128.
• Nardi, S., Carletti, P., Pizzeghello, D., Muscolo, A., (2009). Biological activities of humic substances. Biophysico-Chemical Processes Involving Natural Nonliving Organic Matter in Environmental Systems, 6: 305-339.
• Noroozisharaf, A., Kaviani, M., (2018). Effect of soil application of humic acid on nutrients uptake, essential oil and chemical compositions of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) under greenhouse conditions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 24(3): 423-431.
• Oktem, A. G., Oktem, A., (2020). Effect of humic acid application methods on yield and some yield characteristics of corn plant ( Zea mays L . indentata ). Journal of Applied Life Sciences International, 23(11): 31-37.
• Pengelly, J. L., Kwasny, S., Bala, S., Evans, J. R., Voznesenskaya, E. V., Koteyeva, N. K., Edwards, G. E., Furbank, R. T., von Caemmerer, S., (2011). Functional analysis of corn husk photosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 156(2): 503-513.
• Ragheb, E., (2016). Sweet corn as affected by foliar application with amino and humic acids under different fertilizer sources. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 43(2): 441-456.
• Rajpar, I., Bhatti, M. B., Hassan, Z. U., Shah, A. N., Tunio, S. D., (2011). Humic acid improves growth, yield and oil content of Brassica compestris L. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Sciences, 27(2): 125-133.
• Scott, P., Pratt, R. C., Hoffman, N., Montgomery, R., (2018). Chapter 10 - speciality corns. In corn: Chemistry and Technology, 3: 289-303.
• Shahryari, R., Khayatnezhad, M., Bahari, N., (2011). Effect of two humic fertilizers on germination and seedling growth of maize genotypes. Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(1): 114-117. Sharif, M. H., AL-Rawi, O. H., (2019). Response of several genotypes of maize (Zea mays L.) to organic fertilizer (Humic ACID). Plant Archives, 19: 112-117.
• Soobhany, N., (2019). Insight into the recovery of nutrients from organic solid waste through biochemical conversion processes for fertilizer production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241: 118-413.
• Tejada, M., Gonzalez, J. L., (2003). Effects of foliar application of a byproduct of the two-step olive oil mill process on maize yield. Agronomie, 23(7): 617-623.
• von Wirén, N., André, B., Harling, H., Gojon, A., Patriarca, E., Merrick, M., Miller, A., Reiss, B., Frommer, W. B., (2000). Improving fertiliser use efficiency in agro-ecosystems and nutrient efficiency in plants. Developments in Plant Genetics and Breeding, 6(C): 225-233.
• Wulandari, P., Sulistyaningsih, E., Handayani, S., Purwanto, B. H., (2019). Growth and yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) on acid soil to different rates of humic acid and NPK fertilizer. Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science), 4(2): 76-84.
• Zandonadi, D. B., Matos, C. R. R., Castro, R. N., Spaccini, R., Olivares, F. L., Canellas, L. P., (2019). Alkamides: a new class of plant growth regulators linked to humic acid bioactivity. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 6(1): 1-12.