Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 110 - 121, 01.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1544176

Abstract

In this study, physical, mechanical and color characteristics of five different apricot cultivars (Hacıhaliloğlu, White Apricot, Kabaaşı, Ordubat and Şalak) grown in Iğdır province of Türkiye were examined and the effects of the relationships between these characteristics on fruit quality and marketability were determined. While fruit width, height, thickness and weight values were examined as physical properties, penetration resistance against forces applied in horizontal and vertical directions were evaluated under the heading of mechanical properties. In addition, multiple component analysis and correlation analysis were applied to detail the relationships between these parameters. As a result of, it was determined that there were statistically significant differences in terms of physical, mechanical and color measurement values for all apricot cultivars. It was concluded that Şalak variety was larger than the other cultivars but more sensitive to mechanical forces. In general, the increase in the size of the apricots increased the deformation under load. As an expected result, the variety difference in apricots also affected the color characteristics. Considering consumer preferences, L* value, which is an indicator of brightness in fruits, has emerged as an important parameter in color measurements. PCA analyses were performed to determine the main components of variance in the data set and it was determined that apricot physical properties had a much more dominant role on this variance (78.39%). The effect of mechanical properties on the variance was calculated as 20.85%. The investigated apricot cultivars showed statistically significant differences in terms of physical, mechanical and colour properties. It was found that the Şalak variety was larger and heavier, but its mechanical resistance was lower.

References

  • Abera, D., Zerihun, M., & Yenasew, A. (2023). Effect of variety and agro-ecology on physio-chemical and organoleptic quality of avocado fruit grown in Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2273637
  • Aktas, T., Polat, R., & Atay, Ü. (2007). Comparison of mechanical properties of some selected almond cultivars with hard and soft shell under compression loading.Journal of Food Process Engineering, 30(5), 660-672. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1745-4530.2007.00164.X
  • Altıkat, S., & Temiz, Ş. (2019). Physico-mechanical and some chemical properties of apricot varieties in Iğdır Province. YYU Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(3), 373-381. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.521570
  • Beygi, S. R., Ghaebi, S. M., & Arabhosseini, A. (2009). Some physico-mechanical properties of apricot fruit, pit and kernel of Ordubad variety. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, 9, 1-16.
  • Cenkowski, S., Bielewicz, J., & Britton, M. G. (1991). A single kernel creep and recovery test. Transactions of the ASAE, 34(6), 2484-2490.
  • Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press.
  • Crisosto, C. H., Garner, D., Crisosto, G. M., & Bowerman, E. (2004). Increasing peach market life by chilling injury reduction. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 34(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.002
  • Demir, B. (2018). Application of data mining and adaptive neuro-fuzzy structure to predict color parameters of walnuts (Juglans regia L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 42(3), 216-226. https://dx.doi.org/10.3906/TAR-1801-78
  • Dogan, A., Firat Ege, K., Levent, O., & Asma, B. (2023). Characterization of new late-spring-frost-tolerant apricot hybrids: physical and biochemical fruit quality attributes, volatile aroma compounds. Ciência Rural, 53(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20220144
  • Gabioud Rebeaud, S., Jaylet, A., Cotter, P., Camps, C., & Christen, D. (2019). A Multi-Parameter Approach for Apricot Texture Analysis.Agriculture, 9(4), 73. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/AGRICULTURE9040073
  • Güler, H., & Aksoy, U. (2018). Impact of harvest time and storage conditions on the physicomechanical properties of apricot fruits. Scientia Horticulturae, 239, 129-135
  • Hacıseferoğulları, H., Özcan, M., Demir, F., & Çalışır, S. (2007). Some nutritional and technological properties of Gilaburu (Viburnum opulus L.) fruits growing wild in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering, 78(4), 1361-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.02.042
  • Hassan-Beygi, S. R. (2009). Some Physico-Mechanical Properties of Apricot Fruit, Pit and Kernel of Ordubad Variety. Journal of Food Engineering, 93(4), 407-412.
  • Jones, D., & Smith, A. (2018). Size and firmness relationship in apricots. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 138, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.01.003
  • Kan, T., & Karaat, F. G. (2019). Farklı rakımlarda yetiştirilen bazı kayısı çeşitleri ile zerdali meyvelerinde fenolik bileşiklerin incelenmesi. YYU Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(1), 88-93.
  • Kan, T., & Karaat, F. G. (2019). Farklı rakımlarda yetiştirilen bazı kayısı çeşitleri ile zerdali meyvelerinde fenolik bileşiklerin incelenmesi. YYU Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(1), 88-93.
  • Kaya, C., & Yildiz, H. (2018). Evaluation of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties grown in different ecological conditions in Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae, 235, 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.050
  • Kramarić, P., et al. (2021). Comparative analysis of mechanical properties and shelf life of apricot fruits. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 58(2), 652-659.
  • Kvam, P. H., & Vidakovic, B. (2007). Statistics for engineering and the sciences. Cengage Learning.
  • Lee, Y. Y., Lee, S., Ham, S. H., Lee, M. G., Hahn, J., Kim, Y., & Choi, Y. J. (2024). Relationship between sensory attributes and instrumental texture properties in meat analog patty system substituted with sweet potato stem. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 104(4), 1657-1665. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13533
  • Mora, F., Zúñiga, P. E., & Figueroa, C. R. (2019). Genetic Variation and Trait Correlations for Fruit Weight, Firmness and Color Parameters in Wild Accessions of Fragaria chiloensis. Agronomy, 9(9), 506. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090506
  • Muradoğlu, F., Pehluvan, M., Gündoğdu, M., & Kaya, T. (2011). Iğdır yöresinde yetiştirilen bazı kayısı (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotiplerin fiziko kimyasal özellikleri ile mineral içerikleri. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1), 17-22.
  • Muzolf-Panek, M., & Waśkiewicz, A. (2022). Relationship between Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant Activity and Color Parameters of Red Table Grape Skins Using Linear Ordering Analysis. Applied Sciences, 12(12), 6146. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12126146
  • Pandova, S., Mihaylova, D., Popova, A., Savchovska, S., & Zhivondov, A. (2023). Dynamic biometric data, total soluble solids, ash content, firmness, and color characteristics of two peach varieties. Acta Scientiarum Technologiae, 45(2), 135-145. https://dx.doi.org/10.15547/ast.2023.02.019
  • Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5
  • Sîrbu, S., Gherghel, M., Iurea, E., Corneanu, M., & Chelaru, S. (2021). Pomological characteristics of some apricot varieties grown in the northeast area of Romania. Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 10(20), 135-144. https://dx.doi.org/10.47068/ctns.2021.v10i20.019
  • Sochor, J., Zitka, O., Skutkova, H., Pavlik, D., Babula, P., Krska, B., ... & Kizek, R. (2010). Content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in fruits of apricot genotypes. Molecules, 15(9), 6285-6305.
  • Tan, B., Kuş, E., Tan, K., Gülsöy, E., & Alwazeer, D. (2023). Determination of optimum harvest time and physical and chemical quality properties of Shalakh (Aprikoz) apricot cultivar during fruit ripening. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 22(1), 73-85. (https://dx.doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2023.4807).7
  • Tas, A. (2023). Determination of fruit quality characteristics of blackberry genotypes growing naturally in Düzce (Türkiye). Omuanajas.
  • Yaldiz, G., & Çamlıca, M. (2024). Genetic diversity of selected basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) genotypes based on morphological, yield, and leaf color parameters. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 47(4), 461-472. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2024.2336262
  • Yildiz, K., et al. (2019). Assessment of mechanical properties of apricot fruits using a texture analyzer. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 149, 186-192.
  • Zhang, Y., Wang, X., & Liu, H. (2015). Correlation between physical dimensions and mechanical properties in peaches. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63(14), 3527-3533. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf506046h
Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 110 - 121, 01.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1544176

Abstract

References

  • Abera, D., Zerihun, M., & Yenasew, A. (2023). Effect of variety and agro-ecology on physio-chemical and organoleptic quality of avocado fruit grown in Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2273637
  • Aktas, T., Polat, R., & Atay, Ü. (2007). Comparison of mechanical properties of some selected almond cultivars with hard and soft shell under compression loading.Journal of Food Process Engineering, 30(5), 660-672. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1745-4530.2007.00164.X
  • Altıkat, S., & Temiz, Ş. (2019). Physico-mechanical and some chemical properties of apricot varieties in Iğdır Province. YYU Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(3), 373-381. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.521570
  • Beygi, S. R., Ghaebi, S. M., & Arabhosseini, A. (2009). Some physico-mechanical properties of apricot fruit, pit and kernel of Ordubad variety. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, 9, 1-16.
  • Cenkowski, S., Bielewicz, J., & Britton, M. G. (1991). A single kernel creep and recovery test. Transactions of the ASAE, 34(6), 2484-2490.
  • Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press.
  • Crisosto, C. H., Garner, D., Crisosto, G. M., & Bowerman, E. (2004). Increasing peach market life by chilling injury reduction. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 34(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.002
  • Demir, B. (2018). Application of data mining and adaptive neuro-fuzzy structure to predict color parameters of walnuts (Juglans regia L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 42(3), 216-226. https://dx.doi.org/10.3906/TAR-1801-78
  • Dogan, A., Firat Ege, K., Levent, O., & Asma, B. (2023). Characterization of new late-spring-frost-tolerant apricot hybrids: physical and biochemical fruit quality attributes, volatile aroma compounds. Ciência Rural, 53(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20220144
  • Gabioud Rebeaud, S., Jaylet, A., Cotter, P., Camps, C., & Christen, D. (2019). A Multi-Parameter Approach for Apricot Texture Analysis.Agriculture, 9(4), 73. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/AGRICULTURE9040073
  • Güler, H., & Aksoy, U. (2018). Impact of harvest time and storage conditions on the physicomechanical properties of apricot fruits. Scientia Horticulturae, 239, 129-135
  • Hacıseferoğulları, H., Özcan, M., Demir, F., & Çalışır, S. (2007). Some nutritional and technological properties of Gilaburu (Viburnum opulus L.) fruits growing wild in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering, 78(4), 1361-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.02.042
  • Hassan-Beygi, S. R. (2009). Some Physico-Mechanical Properties of Apricot Fruit, Pit and Kernel of Ordubad Variety. Journal of Food Engineering, 93(4), 407-412.
  • Jones, D., & Smith, A. (2018). Size and firmness relationship in apricots. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 138, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.01.003
  • Kan, T., & Karaat, F. G. (2019). Farklı rakımlarda yetiştirilen bazı kayısı çeşitleri ile zerdali meyvelerinde fenolik bileşiklerin incelenmesi. YYU Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(1), 88-93.
  • Kan, T., & Karaat, F. G. (2019). Farklı rakımlarda yetiştirilen bazı kayısı çeşitleri ile zerdali meyvelerinde fenolik bileşiklerin incelenmesi. YYU Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(1), 88-93.
  • Kaya, C., & Yildiz, H. (2018). Evaluation of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties grown in different ecological conditions in Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae, 235, 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.050
  • Kramarić, P., et al. (2021). Comparative analysis of mechanical properties and shelf life of apricot fruits. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 58(2), 652-659.
  • Kvam, P. H., & Vidakovic, B. (2007). Statistics for engineering and the sciences. Cengage Learning.
  • Lee, Y. Y., Lee, S., Ham, S. H., Lee, M. G., Hahn, J., Kim, Y., & Choi, Y. J. (2024). Relationship between sensory attributes and instrumental texture properties in meat analog patty system substituted with sweet potato stem. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 104(4), 1657-1665. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13533
  • Mora, F., Zúñiga, P. E., & Figueroa, C. R. (2019). Genetic Variation and Trait Correlations for Fruit Weight, Firmness and Color Parameters in Wild Accessions of Fragaria chiloensis. Agronomy, 9(9), 506. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090506
  • Muradoğlu, F., Pehluvan, M., Gündoğdu, M., & Kaya, T. (2011). Iğdır yöresinde yetiştirilen bazı kayısı (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotiplerin fiziko kimyasal özellikleri ile mineral içerikleri. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1), 17-22.
  • Muzolf-Panek, M., & Waśkiewicz, A. (2022). Relationship between Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant Activity and Color Parameters of Red Table Grape Skins Using Linear Ordering Analysis. Applied Sciences, 12(12), 6146. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12126146
  • Pandova, S., Mihaylova, D., Popova, A., Savchovska, S., & Zhivondov, A. (2023). Dynamic biometric data, total soluble solids, ash content, firmness, and color characteristics of two peach varieties. Acta Scientiarum Technologiae, 45(2), 135-145. https://dx.doi.org/10.15547/ast.2023.02.019
  • Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5
  • Sîrbu, S., Gherghel, M., Iurea, E., Corneanu, M., & Chelaru, S. (2021). Pomological characteristics of some apricot varieties grown in the northeast area of Romania. Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 10(20), 135-144. https://dx.doi.org/10.47068/ctns.2021.v10i20.019
  • Sochor, J., Zitka, O., Skutkova, H., Pavlik, D., Babula, P., Krska, B., ... & Kizek, R. (2010). Content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in fruits of apricot genotypes. Molecules, 15(9), 6285-6305.
  • Tan, B., Kuş, E., Tan, K., Gülsöy, E., & Alwazeer, D. (2023). Determination of optimum harvest time and physical and chemical quality properties of Shalakh (Aprikoz) apricot cultivar during fruit ripening. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 22(1), 73-85. (https://dx.doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2023.4807).7
  • Tas, A. (2023). Determination of fruit quality characteristics of blackberry genotypes growing naturally in Düzce (Türkiye). Omuanajas.
  • Yaldiz, G., & Çamlıca, M. (2024). Genetic diversity of selected basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) genotypes based on morphological, yield, and leaf color parameters. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 47(4), 461-472. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2024.2336262
  • Yildiz, K., et al. (2019). Assessment of mechanical properties of apricot fruits using a texture analyzer. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 149, 186-192.
  • Zhang, Y., Wang, X., & Liu, H. (2015). Correlation between physical dimensions and mechanical properties in peaches. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63(14), 3527-3533. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf506046h
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Biosystem
Journal Section Biyosistem Mühendisliği / Biosystem Engineering
Authors

Alperay Altıkat 0009-0005-8270-1728

Tuncay Kaya 0000-0002-9126-4567

Mehmet Hakkı Alma 0000-0001-7011-3965

Early Pub Date February 20, 2025
Publication Date March 1, 2025
Submission Date September 5, 2024
Acceptance Date October 24, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Altıkat, A., Kaya, T., & Alma, M. H. (2025). A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 15(1), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1544176
AMA Altıkat A, Kaya T, Alma MH. A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. March 2025;15(1):110-121. doi:10.21597/jist.1544176
Chicago Altıkat, Alperay, Tuncay Kaya, and Mehmet Hakkı Alma. “A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 15, no. 1 (March 2025): 110-21. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1544176.
EndNote Altıkat A, Kaya T, Alma MH (March 1, 2025) A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 15 1 110–121.
IEEE A. Altıkat, T. Kaya, and M. H. Alma, “A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment”, J. Inst. Sci. and Tech., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 110–121, 2025, doi: 10.21597/jist.1544176.
ISNAD Altıkat, Alperay et al. “A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 15/1 (March 2025), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1544176.
JAMA Altıkat A, Kaya T, Alma MH. A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2025;15:110–121.
MLA Altıkat, Alperay et al. “A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, pp. 110-21, doi:10.21597/jist.1544176.
Vancouver Altıkat A, Kaya T, Alma MH. A Multidimensional Approach to Apricot Quality Assessment. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2025;15(1):110-21.