FİBER POST SİMANTASYONUNDA TÜKÜRÜK KONTAMİNASYONUNUN BAĞLANMA DEĞERLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Keywords

• Adesif ajan, kontaminasyon, bağlanma

References

1. Civelek A, Özel E. Diş Sert Dokusunun Yetersiz Olduğu Olguların Restorasyonları: 3 Olgu Sunumu. Dişhekimliğinde Klinik 17: 42ı 47, 2004.
2. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 71: 565-567, 1994.
3. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2000 May;13(Spec No): 9B-13B.
4. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431-7.
5. Akkayan B.An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber- reinforced zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 155-62.
6. Manocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod 2001; 27: 758-61.
7. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation.Dent Mater 2001; 17: 422-9.
8. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber- reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16: 39-44.

9. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 307-12.
10. Pest LB, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post -endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 596-602.
11. Kugel G,Ferrari M: The science of bonding:from first to sixth generation.J M Dent Assoc 2000; 131 (Suppl.): 20S-25S.
12. Ferrari M, Grandini S, Simonetti M, Monticelli F, Goracci C. Inflence of a microbrush on bonding fiber post into root canal under clinical conditions.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 627-31.
13. Moll LK, Park HJ, Haller B. Bond strength of adhesive/composite combinations to dentin involving total and self etch adhesives.J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 171-80.
14. Gallo JR, Henderson M, Burgess JO: Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1999;12: 277-82.
15. Krishna Neelagiri, M Kundabala,1 Rashmi A Shashi, Manuel S Thomas, 1 and Abhishek Parolia 1. Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study J Conserv Dent. 2010 Apr- Jun; 13 (2): 71-75.
16. Miyasaka K, Nakabayashi N. Combination of EDTA conditioner and Phenyl-P/HEMA self- etching primer for bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 153-7.
17. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Lopes GC. Effects of repeated use on bond strengths of onebottle adhesives. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 819-23.
18. Jacobsen T, Söderholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 132-6.
19. Johnson ME, Burgess JO, Hermesch CB, Buikema DJ. Saliva contamination of dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 205-10.
20. Powers JM, Finger WJ, Xie J.Bonding of composite resin to contaminated enamel and dentin. J Prostohodont 1995; 4: 28-32.
21. Hansen EK,Munksgaard EC. Salivary contamination vs efficacy of dentinbonding agents. Dent Mater 1989; 5; 329-33.
22. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 567-72.