COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA

Volume: 50 Number: 3 October 3, 2016
EN

COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiography in detecting the presence and location of maxillary sinus septa.

Materials and Methods: This study included radiographic examination of 104 maxillary sinuses of 52 individuals whose panoramic radiographs and CBCT images were obtained for several dental causes which were examined by the consensus of four dentomaxillofacial radiologists. The posterior maxillary segments in proximity of maxillary sinus were classified as edentulous and dentate maxillary segments. The location of maxillary sinus septa was classified as primary septa and secondary septa according to the presence of maxillary tooth at the affected site. The maxillary sinus septa were divided into three categories (anterior, middle and posterior) according to its relation with posterior maxillary teeth. Data were statistically analyzed with chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results: The septa were found in 23.1% and 29.8% of the maxillary sinuses on panoramic radiography and CBCT images, respectively. The majority of maxillary sinus septa were observed in dentate posterior maxillary segments on both panoramic (45.8%) radiography and CBCT (64.5%) images. Statistically significant differences (p<0.001) were found between panoramic radiography and CBCT images for presence, location and neighborhood with the posterior maxillary teeth of maxillary sinus septa.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated the low reliability of panoramic radiography images in the detection of maxillary sinus septa. CBCT images can provide valuable information to the clinicians about the presence and location of maxillary sinus septa.

Keywords

References

  1. Mc Growan DA, Baxter PW & James J. The maxillary sinus and its dental implications.1st ed. London: Wright Co, 1993, pp.1-25.
  2. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ. Gray’s anatomy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1995, 1637.
  3. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38(8):613-616.
  4. Koymen R, Gocmen-Mas N, Karacayli U, Ortakoglu K, Ozen T, Yazici AC. Anatomic evaluation of maxillary sinus septa: Surgery and radiology. Clin Anat 2009;22(5):563-570.
  5. Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66(7):1426-1438.
  6. Maestre-Ferrin L, Galan-Gil S, Rubio-Serrano M, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Oltra D. Maxillary sinus septa: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15(2):e383-386.
  7. Underwood AS. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. J Anat Physiol 1910;44(Pt 4):354-369.
  8. Betts NJ, Miloro M. Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52(3):332-333.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Publication Date

October 3, 2016

Submission Date

January 8, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 50 Number: 3

APA
Değerli, Ş., Toraman Alkurt, M., Peker, I., Cebeci, A. R. İ., & Sadık, E. (2016). COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, 50(3), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.84476
AMA
1.Değerli Ş, Toraman Alkurt M, Peker I, Cebeci ARİ, Sadık E. COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2016;50(3):8-14. doi:10.17096/jiufd.84476
Chicago
Değerli, Şerife, Meryem Toraman Alkurt, Ilkay Peker, Ali Rıza İlker Cebeci, and Elif Sadık. 2016. “COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 50 (3): 8-14. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.84476.
EndNote
Değerli Ş, Toraman Alkurt M, Peker I, Cebeci ARİ, Sadık E (October 1, 2016) COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 50 3 8–14.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Değerli, M. Toraman Alkurt, I. Peker, A. R. İ. Cebeci, and E. Sadık, “COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA”, J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 8–14, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.17096/jiufd.84476.
ISNAD
Değerli, Şerife - Toraman Alkurt, Meryem - Peker, Ilkay - Cebeci, Ali Rıza İlker - Sadık, Elif. “COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 50/3 (October 1, 2016): 8-14. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.84476.
JAMA
1.Değerli Ş, Toraman Alkurt M, Peker I, Cebeci ARİ, Sadık E. COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2016;50:8–14.
MLA
Değerli, Şerife, et al. “COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, vol. 50, no. 3, Oct. 2016, pp. 8-14, doi:10.17096/jiufd.84476.
Vancouver
1.Şerife Değerli, Meryem Toraman Alkurt, Ilkay Peker, Ali Rıza İlker Cebeci, Elif Sadık. COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING MAXILLARY SINUS SEPTA. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2016 Oct. 1;50(3):8-14. doi:10.17096/jiufd.84476