İngilize Yazılı Anlatım Dersinin Sorunları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Abstract

The present study is a survey study which aims to determine the problems in the area of composition writing. Studies indicate that there are problems in writing but so far, no any systematical study on these problems has been recorded. Additionally, it was noticed that there are limited studies on the subject matter. Therefore, this study tries to reveal the problems more systematically. The literature was reviewed and the results were summed up. This study aims to help researchers to find out solutions in the light of identified problems in the study.

Keywords

• -

İngilizce Yazılı Anlatım Dersinin Sorunları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bugüne kadar yapılan araştırmalarda, Yazılı Anlatım derslerine yönelik sorunların olduğu belirtilmiştir; fakat bu sorunların neler olduğunu sistematik olarak ortaya koyan bir araştırmaya rastlanmamıştır. Ayrıca bu alanda yapılan çalışmaların ve tezlerin sınırlı olması da dikkat çekicidir. Bu çalışma, bu sorunları toplu olarak sunan bir alan yazın taramasıdır. Ulaşılabilen pek çok kitap, makale ve tez taranmış, bunlardan elde edilen tüm bilgiler sentezlenmiş ve Yazılı Anlatım dersinin sorunlarına ilişkin bütünsel ve tutarlı bilgiler elde edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Sorunların belirlenmesinin, çözümleri bulmada kolaylık sağlayacağı görüşünden hareketle araştırmacıların, bu çalışmanın sonuçlarından faydalanarak Yazılı Anlatım derslerindeki sorunlara yönelik çözüm önerileri üretebilecekleri düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yazma becerisi, kompozisyonda duyuşsal ve bilişsel sorunlar

References

1. R. Abu Rass, Integrating Reading And Writing For Effective Language Teaching. English Teaching Forum Vol.39 No 1, January-March, (2001), p:30.
2. N. Abi Sarma, Teaching Writing. http://homepages.wmich.edu/jbush/bp/index.html (2000)
3. R.AllenChapter One: Expanding Writing's Role in Learning http/:wwww.ascd.or/publications/curr_update/2003summer/allen.html. (2003).
4. N. Ayala, Autobiography and the Creative Impulse in Writing the Short Story, (2003). www.yale.edu/ynth (erişim tarihi: 20 .10. 2003; 17:29:33).
5. E. Baak, Portfolio Development. Forum :Vol 35 No 2, April - June (1997). pp: 38… Bacha, N. N. (2002). Testing Writing in EFL Classrooms: Student Expectations English Teaching Forum April (14-27) http://www.English Teaching Forum.com
6. S. Beare, Differences in Content Generating and Planning Processes of Adult L1 and L2 Proficient Writers. (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis) University of Ottawa, Canada. http://www.lang.ltsn.ac.uk/resources/paper.aspx?resourceid=1292 (2000).
7. F. Bölükbaş, Yansıtıcı Öğretimin İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Öğrencilerinin Türkçe Dersine Yönelik Tutum ve Başarıları Üzerindeki Etkililiği (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi) Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. (İzmir, 2004).
8. A. Brender, An Ethnographic Study o f Second-language Student Motivation for Attending Writing Center Tutorials. Paper presented at the First National Writing Center Conference, (New Orleans, 1993).

9. (http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/98/jul/brender.html J.Bush,. Teachers Can Help Students Get Started, http://homepages.wmich.edu/jbush/bp/index.html.124. (2002).
10. B. M. Castello, Strategies In The Written Composition Process: A Proposal For The Teaching-Learning Of Argumentative Text. Universitat Autonoma De Barcelona (Spain, 1993) http://www.umi.proquest/ Digital Dissertations - Full Citation & Abstract1
11. G. Celkan, Rhetoric: Discovery of Writing skills and Patterns Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, (Bornova-İzmir, 1990).
12. T. Dalak, La Creativite Et l’expression ecrite Dans l’enseignement du français language etrangere. Eskişehir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) (Eskişehir, 2000).
13. K.Deniz, Yazılı Anlatım Becerileri Yönünden Köy ve Kent Beşinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Durumu. (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Çanakkale Onsekizmart Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. (Çanakkale, 2000).
14. C. Diaz.; Camacho, F. L.; Christy, Pretty J. A.. A Comparison of Imaginary, Dialogua and Drawing Prewiriting Strategies with Second-grade Students in Guam. Educational Reseacrh Volume: 37 , number: 2, Summer. (177-184). (1995).
15. Dietrich, C. E. The Articulation, Production, And Validation Of Worth In Student Writing (Unpublished PhD Dissertation The Ohio State University. (USA, 1993) . http://wwwlib.Umi.Com/Dissertations
16. W. Doyle, Classroom organization and management, Bulunduğu Eser:Merlin C. Wittrock (Ed), Handbook of research on teaching, Third Ed. Mc Millan (NewYork, 1986).
17. G. Durukafa, Cluster Metodu. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Sayı: 3. Cilt: 8, ss:83-114. (Ankara, 1992). England, K. Coerced Tutoring, Harmful or Helpful. www.monroeccc.edu/writing/oryessay.htm (2002).
18. İ. Ergenç, Beyindeki Dil. Bilim ve Teknik Dergisi. Tubitak Yayınları. Sayı:314. Cilt:275 Ocak, ss:36-39. (Ankara, 1994).
19. L Flower, Ackerman, J. Writers at Work. Texas: Harcourt Brace & Company. (USA, 1994).
20. L. Flower, Writer- Based Prose: A Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing (Bulunduğu eser: Writing in a Second Language) Bruce Leeds, Editor, (Longman 1996). Ss : 62-80.
21. W.Fowler, S. Progressive Writing Skills , Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.( Hong Kong, 1989).
22. K. Frizler, Re: Writing Helps Speaking. On-line: TESL-L. (1995). http://www.cltr.uq.edu.au/oncall/article.htm#FriB F. Genesee, Brain Research: Implications for Second Language Learning. http://repositories.cdlib.org/crede/occrpts/eric_00_12_brain (2000)
23. M. Gilholly, A. Fluency First: Reversing the Traditional ESL Sequence. Bulunduğu eser: Writing in a Second Language Insights from First and Second Language Teaching and Research. Bruce Leeds (Editör), (Longman, 1996).
24. B. Göğüş, Orta Dereceli Okullarımızda Türkçe ve Yazın Eğitimi, Gül Yay., (Ankara. 1978).
25. G.Gökalp, Gonca A. Derslikten Günlük Yaşama Edebiyat Eğitimi. Türkbilig 2000/ITürkoloji Araştırmaları. (Ankara, 2001) ss: 185-202.
26. K. Gocsik, Teaching Writing Through Literature- Using Reading to TeachWriting.http://www.dartmouth.edu/compose/faculty/pedagogies/literature.ht ml-(1997).
27. S. Güneş Anlatım Bilgisi.Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Rektörlük Matbaası, Üçüncü Basım, (İzmir, 2003).
28. R. Hansen, S. Hansen, K. The Importance of Good Writing Skills. http://www.quintcareers.com/ (erişim tarihi: 02.03.2003)
29. L. Harklau, The Role of Writing in Classroom Second Language Acquisition Journal of Secod Language Writing. Volume 11, Number 4, Ss: 329-350. (2002).
30. M. Harris, Teaching one-to-one: The writing conference. Urbana IL: National Council of Teachers of English. (1986).
31. K. Harris, R.; Schmidt ,T.; Graham, S. Every Child Can Write: Strategies for Composition and Self-Regulation in the Writing Process http://www.ldonline.org. (2002).
32. J. Hart, Prewriting. New York: Feb 15, 1997.Vol.130, Iss. 7; pg. 17, 1 tp proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did. (1997). 11125162&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=42977&RQT&V
33. L.Hill, A. Picture Composition Book. Longman. Longman Group Ltd. (London, 1971).
34. Z. Hossinni, Methodology/Teaching English as a Foreign Language, İslamic Azad University, Tahran Central Brench, (Iran, 1998).
35. R. Hurd, The effect to audience specification on writing anxiety, performance and sensitivity to audience. Tennessee. US (Eric Document Reproductive Service. No: ED 269767. (1985).
36. R. Jenkinson, Y. The intersection of gender and culture in the teaching of writing. College Teaching. Volume: 41. Issue: 1. 1993. P:19. www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=94305170
37. I. Leki, Composing Strategies and Perception Longman. Bulunduğu eser: Writing in a Second Language Insights from First and Second Language Teaching and Research. (1996).
38. E. McMahan, Catching Up On Composition ADE Bulletin 085 (Winter 1986):ss:54-56.
39. M.Murcia, C. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, Heinle&Heinle Publishers, ( Massachusetts, 1991)
40. S. Myers, Teaching Writing as a Process and Teaching Sentence-Level Syntax: Reformulation as ESL Composition Feedback TESL-EJ. vol.2.No. 4 A-2 June . http/: www. Elt.journal.com (1997).
41. M. Natan, Clustering Activity. (http://www.iusd.k12.ca.us/).(2000).
42. D. Newson, Re:Writing Helps Speaking, TESL-L. www.cltr.uq.edu.au/oncall/article.htmlFriB (1995).
43. R. Oxford, Language Learning Strategies: Un Update www. Eric.digest.com, (1994),
44. Ş. Özil, Yazma Öğrenilebilir Mi?, Cem Yayınevi , Çağdaş Yaşamı Destekleme Derneği Yayınları 3, ( İstanbul, 1991).
45. A. Pincas, Writing in English Macmillan Publishers, Hong Kong. Rafferty C., Leinenbach, M. (1996). Blazing a Portfolio Trail-Without a Crystal Ball. Middle School Journal (1988). September: pp 27-32.
46. M. Radziemski, C. New Tools, New Look: Word Processing To Support Writing Strategies In Post-Secondary Composition Classes (Basılmamış doktora tezi) Arizona State University. http://www.umi.proquest/ Digital Dissertations - Full Citation & Abstract1(1995).
47. A. Raimes, Exploring Through Writing, A process Approach to ESL Composition, Second Edition, St. Martin’s Press, (New York, 1992).
48. A. Raimes, Out of Woods: Emerging Traditions in the Teaching of Writing. (Bulunduğu eser: Writing in a Second Language) Bruce Leeds, (Editor), (Longman, 1996). pp: 10-23
49. Ş. Ruhi, İlköğretim Öğrenci Kompozisyonlarındaki Bağdaşıklık Sorunları. XI.Dilbilim Kurultayı. 22-23 Mayıs.ODTÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Bölümü, (Ankara. 1997).
50. K. Schwartz, L. The Internet Public Library, fuj+1 http://www.ipl.org/ - = - ipl.org (1997).
51. M .Schweiker, Karyn E.; Marra, W. T. Invesiıgating The Effects Of Prewriting Activities On Writing Performance And Anxiety Of At-Risk Students. Reading Psychology; Apr-Jun, Vol. 21 Issue 2, P99, 16p. (2000). Http://Search.Epnet.Com/Login.Aspx?Direct=True&Db=Aph&An=3825011
52. G. Richards, R. Strategies for the Reluctant Writer. www.ldonline.org.shtml (2002). J.Richards, (www.retctrpress.com (2000).
53. G. Rico, L. Writing the Natural Way. (New York, USA, 2000). Toward an Expanded Conception of Knowing. Educational Horizons, Winter, pg: 99-108 (1993)
54. Reading, the Arts, And The Creation of Meaning. ED. Elliot W.Eisner. Reston.Va: National Art Education Association,( USA, 1978).
55. Metaphor and Knowing: Analysis, Synthesis, Rationale (Basılmamış doktora tezi), Standford University, Palo Alto, CA. (1976).
56. K. Strickland, Literacy, Not labels: Celebrating Student’s Through Whole Language. Portsmouth: Boynton & Cook. (1995).
57. N. Sommers, Responding to Student Writing. Bulunduğu eser: Writing in a Second Language. Insights from First and Second Language Teaching and Research. Editor: Bruce Leeds. Longman. (1996). ss: 148-154
58. P. Ur, A Course in Language Teaching, Practice and Theory, Cambridge University Press, , Cambridge. (1996).
59. Ş. Ünalan, Eleştirel Düşünme Öğretimi. Dil Dergisi, Sayı: 69, Temmuz. (Ankara, 1998).
60. S. Wheeler, Prewriting Strategies Tips For Tutoring a Student With a Research Paper. http://www.monroeccc.edu/writing/essays.htm (2003).
61. R..Winett, S. Prewriting" a Must for Good Technical Prose Computerworld Framingham: Oct. 1,Vol.13, Iss. 40; s:13 www.okul.sevgisi (erişim:2003).
62. K. Winrow, The Effects of Prewriting Strategies on Planning Activity: Generating, Organising and Goal Setting, www.staffs.ac.uk/personal/sciences/smt15/mt15/dissertations/abstracts/99.html.16 k .(1999).
63. M. Wolfersberger, L1 to L2 Writing Process and Strategy Transfer: A Look at Lower Proficiency Writers. http://www.writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ sayı:7, No:2, A-6, September. (2003).
64. G. Yalçın, Ü. Beyin-Dil İlişkisi ve Bunun Yazma Becerilerine Yansımaları. 4. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildirileri: 2. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, (Eskişehir, 1999). (www.kadınlar.com). http//:ss.uno.edu.learning theories