Identifying the needs of postgraduate students: The first step of academic writing courses

Abstract

Academic writing practices constitute central processes through which students learn the conventions of their disciplines to meet the expectations of their academic communities. Therefore, academic writing courses should touch on the specific dimensions of it. One of the most prominent requirements of these courses is to identify the needs of students and implement a program based on the negotiation between the needs of students and the expectations of academic communities. The present study aimed to explore the academic writing needs of Turkish postgraduate students in the departments of English Language Teaching and English Language and Literature through an online questionnaire including Likert-type items and open-ended questions. The Likert-type items were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test statistics while the data gathered from open-ended questions was exposed to thematic analysis. We found that the participants (30 Turkish postgraduate students of English) obtained a clear idea of the disciplinary conventions and the importance of communication with readers in academic genres but they did not seem to develop awareness of building stance in academic genres. There was not a statistical difference between MA and PhD students’ academic writing needs. Apparently, academic writing courses in post-graduate programs should place heavy demands on more specific needs-based curriculum to meet their students’ target needs.

Keywords

• postgraduate programs; academic writing; needs analysis

References

1. Al-Hashemi, B. I., AlSubaeie, M. S., & Shukri, N. A. (2017). Academic writing needs of TESOL postgraduate in the Saudi context. International Journal of English Language Education, 5(2), 151-163. Doi: 10.5296/ijele.v5i2.12235
2. Al-Khasawneh, F. M. S., & Maher, S. (2010). Writing for academic purposes: Problems faced by Arab postgraduate students of the college of business, UUM. ESP World, 9(2), 1-23.
3. Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4-18.
4. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
5. Buckingham, L. (2008). Development of English Academic Writing Competence by Turkish Scholars. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 1-18.
6. Burke, S. B. (2010). The construction of writer identity in the academic writing of Korean ESL students: A qualitative study of six Korean students in the U.S. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana.
7. Cai, L. J. (2017). Students’ perceptions of academic writing: A needs analysis of EAP in China. In K. Kimura & J. Middlecamp (Eds.), Asian-focused ELT research and practice: Voices from the far edge (p. 127-151). Cambodia: Phnom Penh.
8. Cameron, C., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2009). Demystifying academic writing: reflections on emotions, know-how and academic identity. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 269-284. doi: 10.1080/03098260902734943

9. Chou, C. (1998). Evaluation and Needs Analysis of an Academic Writing Course for International Graduate Students: ELI 83.
10. Feak, C. B. (2016). EAP supports for postgraduate students. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (p. 489-501). London: Routledge.
11. Huang, L. S. (2010). Seeing eye to eye? The academic writing needs of graduate and undergraduate students from students’ and instructors’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 517-539.
12. Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader. Written Communication, 18(4), 529-574.
13. Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1081-1112.
14. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. The USA: The University of Michigan Press.
15. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hyland, K. (2010). Community and individuality: Performing identity in Applied Linguistics. Written Communication, 27(2), 159-188. Doi: 10.1177/0741088309357846
17. Hyland, K. (2005a). Patterns of engagement: dialogic features and L2 graduate writing. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (Eds.), Analyzing academic writing (p. 5-23). Cornwall, Continuum.
18. Hyland, K. (2005b). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
19. Hyland, K. (2005c). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. Doi: 10.1177/1461445605050365
20. Irvin, L. L. (2010). What is “academic” writing? Writing spaces: Readings on Writing, 1.
21. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/writingspaces1/irvin--what-is-academic-writing.pdf
22. Klimova, B. F. (2015). Designing an EAP Course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 634-638.
23. King, N. & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Cornwall: MPG Books Group.
24. Li, L. Y., & Vandermensbrugghe, J. (2011). Supporting the thesis writing process of international research students through an ongoing writing group. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 195-205.
25. Long, M. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ma, X. (2018). L2 postgraduate students’ conceptions of English academic writing: Perspectives of mainland Chinese students. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 81-82.
27. Murray, M., & Moore, S. (2006). The handbook of academic writing. Berkshire: Open University Press.
28. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
29. Sağlamel, H. & Kayaoğlu, M. N. (2015). English major students’ perceptions of academic writing: A struggle between writing to learn and learning to write. Journal of History Culture and Art Research 4(3), 37-52. Doi: 10.7596/taksad.v4i3.477.
30. Tait, J. (1999). Multiple Perspectives on Academic Writing Needs. Paper presented at 33rd Annual TESOL Convention, (p.1-20). NY, March 1999. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED432157.pdf