Usage of English speech like expressions in Turkish students' written works

Year 2020, , 1006 - 1018, 24.06.2020

Kadriye Aytaç Demirçivi

https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759357

Abstract

The present study investigates the usage of speech like expressions in written works of Turkish learners of English. It also aims to find out the differences between C1 and B1 level learners in terms of the frequency and types of speech like expressions. The participants in this study were 21 B1 and 33 C1 level students at a state university in Turkey. For this study, students' writing assignments were collected. For the frequency analysis, manual counting of the words was used. For the types of speech like expressions, the data were divided into different groups of speech like expressions based on the framework of previous studies. The analysis of the data showed that B1 level learners use speech like expressions much more commonly than C1 level learners. In addition, there were also some differences in terms of the types of the speech like expressions used by C1 and B1 level learners.

Keywords

speech like expressions; writing; C1 learners; B1 learners; Turkish learners of English

References

• Babanoğlu, P. (2014). A Corpus-based Study on the Use of Pragmatic Markers as Speech-like Features in Turkish EFL Learners’ Argumentative Essays. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,136,186-193.
• Cullen, R., and I. Kuo. (2007). Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link? TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 361–386.
• DeVito, J. A. (1965). Comprehension factors in oral and written discourse of skilled communicators. Speech Monographs, 32, 124-128.
• Driemann, G. H. J. (1962). Differences between written and spoken language. Acta Psychologica, 20, 36-57.
• Gilquin, G.& Paquot, M. (2007). Spoken Features in Learner Academic Writing: Identification, Explanation and Solution. Proceedings of the 4th Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Birmingham, 27–30 July 2007.
• Hilliard, A. (2014). Spoken Grammar and Its Role in the English Language Classroom. English Teaching Forum , v52 n4 p2-13 2014. 12 pp.
• Olson, D.R. (1977b), The language of instruction: The literate bias of schooling. In R. Anderson, R. Spiro & W. Montague (eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Park, D. (2007). Identifying & using formal & informal vocabulary. IDP Education, the University of Cambridge and the British Council, the Post Publishing Public Co. Ltd.
• Schallert, D. L., Kleiman, G. M., &Rubin, A. D. (1977). Analyses of differences between written and oral language. Center for the Study of Reading, Technical Report No. 29.
• Simcikaite, A. (2012). Spoken Discourse Markers in Learner Academic Writing. Studies about Languages, 20, 27- 34.
• Stenström, A. (2004). An introduction to spoken inter- action. London: Longman.
• Tannen, D. (1984). Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood, NJ: ABLEX Publishing Corporation.
• Willis, D. (2003). Rules, patterns and words: Grammar and lexis in English language teaching. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.