Dil öğrenenlerin Türkiye bağlamında okuduğunu anlama ihtiyaçları; Kapsamlı bir ihtiyaç analizi

Abstract

Bu araştırma, ortaokul 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuma anlama ihtiyaçlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Verilerin ihtiyaç analizi formları, çevresel ihtiyaç analizi kontrol listeleri ve öğretmen görüşmeleri kullanılarak toplandığı karma yöntemli bir tasarım kullanılmıştır. Veriler 28 öğrenci ve 23 öğretmenden toplanmıştır. Bulgular, öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama ihtiyaçlarının üç temel alanda kategorize edilebileceğini ortaya koymuştur: (1) okuma stratejilerinin etkin kullanımı, kelime dağarcığı gelişimi ve eleştirel düşünme becerilerini içeren okuma becerileri ve stratejileri; (2 )hem ana dil hem de hedef dildeki yeterliliği ve kültürel anlayış; ve (3) kaynaklara, teknolojiye ulaşım ve destekleyici öğrenme ortamları. Bu bulgular, okuduğunu anlamanın karmaşık doğasının altını çizmektedir. Etkili okuduğunu anlama; dil yeterliliği, okuma stratejileri, çeşitli ve ilgi çekici okuma materyalleri ve destekleyici bir öğrenme ortamı gibi çeşitli faktörleri kapsayan bütüncül bir yaklaşım gerektirir. Birbiriyle bağlantılı bu unsurların ele alınmasıyla, Türk öğrenciler için daha etkili ve kapsayıcı okuma deneyimleri geliştirmeye destek olabilir.

Keywords

• Dil öğrenen Türkçe öğrencileri
• okuduğunu anlama
• yabancı dil olarak İngilizce
• ihtiyaç analizi
• ortaokul

Language Learners' Reading Comprehension Needs in The Turkish Context: A Comprehensive Needs Analysis.

Abstract

This study investigated the reading comprehension needs of 8th-grade Turkish EFL learners in lower secondary education. A mixed-method design was employed in which data were gathered using needs analysis forms, environmental needs analysis checklists, and teacher interviews. Data were collected from 28 students and 23 teachers. The findings revealed that students' reading comprehension needs can be categorized into three primary areas: (1) reading skills and strategies, including the effective use of reading strategies, vocabulary development, and critical thinking skills; (2) language proficiency, encompassing proficiency in both native and target languages and cultural understanding; and (3) environmental factors, such as access to resources, technology, and supportive learning environments. These findings underscore the complex nature of reading comprehension. Effective reading comprehension requires a holistic approach that encompasses various factors, including language proficiency, reading strategies, diverse and engaging reading materials and a supportive learning environment. By addressing these interconnected elements, more effective and inclusive reading experiences can be cultivated for Turkish EFL students.

Keywords

• Turkish language learners
• reading comprehension
• English as a foreign language
• needs analysis
• lower secondary school

References

1. Adhi, A. M. K., Nurkamto, J., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Assessing the reading competence needs of senior high school students in national examination: Teachers' perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(4), 644-651. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628470
2. Ahmetović, E., & Dubravac, V. (2021). Elementary school EFL learning experience: A needs analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(12), 1515-1525. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.02
3. Alvarez, G., Broca, A., & Bruton, A. (1993). Reading wants and needs in EFL: Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 9(2), 859-865.
4. AlGhamdi, A. A., AlQadi, S. Z., AlHammad, J. M., & Shukri, N. A. (2018). Reading Needs Analysis of EFL Learners in the Saudi Context: Identifying Needs and Deficiencies. International Journal of English Language Education, 6(2), 92-111. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v6i2.13863
5. Alshehri, M. G., & Zhang, D. (2022). The Lexical Basis of Second Language Reading Comprehension: From (Sub) Lexical Knowledge to Processing Efficiency. Language Learning, 72(2), 325-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12478
6. Altiner, C. (2018). Turkish EFL Learners' Willingness to Communicate in L2 and Motivation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(n11a), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i11a.3815
7. Altunkaya, H., & Ates, A. (2018). Sources of Reading Anxiety among the Learners of Turkish as a Foreign Language. Asian journal of education and training, 4(3), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2018.43.161.169
8. Andrés, M. (2020). Adult language learners’ needs in reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(2), 199-209.

9. Atai, M. R., & Nazari, O. (2011). Exploring reading comprehension needs of Iranian EAP students of health information management (HIM): A triangulated approach. System, 39(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.015
10. Bagci, H., & Unveren, D. (2020). Investigation the Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies and Self-Efficacy Perception in Reading Comprehension in Mother-Tongue: Sample of 8th-graders. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.83
11. Barin, M., & Eyerci, A. (2021). A survey on the relationship between willingness to communicate and learner autonomy of Turkish EFL students. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9, 104-116. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9is1-may.4006
12. Beceren, S. (2020). Vocabulary size of Turkish EFL learners at the tertiary level and its' impact on their reading and listening comprehension. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 14(32), 206-219. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.258.11
13. Berman, E. A. (2017). An exploratory sequential mixed methods approach to understanding researchers’ data management practices at UVM: Integrated findings to develop research data services. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 6(1), 1-24.
14. Brantmeier, C. (2003). Beyond linguistic knowledge: Individual differences in second language reading. Foreign Language Annals, 36(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb01930.x
15. Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. J. (1989). Interactive strategies for reading and learning. Cambridge University Press.
16. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
17. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of education, 189(1-2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-208
18. Endley, M. J. (2016). Proficiency as a variable in Gulf EFL students’ employment of reading strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 183-223.
19. Erten, İ. H., & Razi, S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 60-77.
20. Fadilah, F. D., Ridwan, N. M., Putri, N. D., Prayoga, S., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). The role of metacognition strategy to enhance reading comprehension. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(3), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i3.231
21. Ghavamnia, M., & Kashkouli, Z. (2022). Motivation, Engagement, Strategy Use, and L2 Reading Proficiency in Iranian EFL Learners: An Investigation of Relations and Predictability. Reading Psychology, 43(7), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2113943
22. Gungor, F., & Yaylı, D. (2016). The interplay between text-based vocabulary size and reading comprehension of Turkish EFL learners. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(4), 1171-1188. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.4.0078
23. He, T. H. (2008). Reading for different goals: The interplay of EFL college students' multiple goals, reading strategy use, and reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(2), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00355.x
24. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge University Press.
25. Isler, C., & Yıldırım, O. (2017). Sources of Turkish EFL learners’ foreign language reading anxiety. JEELS, 4(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v4i1.46
26. Kanmaz, O. (2022). Effects of a pre-reading strategy instruction program on the reading comprehension skills of EFL learners. The Reading Matrix, 22(1), 37–57.
27. Karakoc, A. I., Ruegg, R., & Gu, P. (2022). Beyond comprehension: Reading requirements in first-year undergraduate courses. Journal of English for academic purposes, 55, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101071
28. Kayaoglu, M. N., & Akbaş, R. D. (2016). An investigation into medical students’ English language needs. Participatory Educational Research, 3(4), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.16.spi.1.8
29. Kazazoglu, S. (2020). The impact of L1 interference on foreign language writing: A contrastive error analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1168-1188. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803621
30. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
31. Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby‐Lervåg, M. (2017). Unpicking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading comprehension: It's simple, but complex. Child Development, 89(5), 1821-1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12861
32. Long, M. H. (Ed.). (2005). Second Language Needs Analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299
33. Maghsoudi, M. (2022). Contributions of motivation to read in L2, proficiency and L1 reading strategy awareness to L2 reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1931591
34. Maybrier, H. R., Mickle, A. M., Escallier, K. E., Lin, N., Schmitt, E. M., Upadhyayula, R. T., ... & Avidan, M. S. (2018). Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres. BMJ open, 8(11), e023137. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023137
35. McLaughlin, B. (2012). Teaching Reading Comprehension: Principles and Practices. Routledge.
36. Ozcan, E. N. (2022). Turkish instructors’ beliefs and EFL learners’ realization of speech act of requests: A descriptive case study. Focus on ELT Journal, 4(2), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.14744/felt.2022.4.2.6
37. Paris, S. G., & Hamilton, E. E. (2014). The development of children's reading comprehension. In Israel, S. E., & Duffy, G. G. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on reading comprehension. (pp. 56-77). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759609-12
38. Pearson, P. D. (2014). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension (pp. 27-55). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759609-11
39. Razavi, M., & Gilakjani, A. P. (2020). The Effect of Teaching Cultural Content on Intermediate Efl Learners'reading Comprehension Ability. Teflin Journal, 31(2), 302-321. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i2/302-321
40. Richards, J. C. (2009). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
41. Salam, A. (2017). Enhancing teaching materials for reading comprehension: A needs analysis study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 355-366.
42. Sonmez, E. (2019). Reading and comprehension needs of native Turkish-speaking secondary school students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 1-16.
43. Suhita, R., Waluyo, H. J., & Setiawan, B. (2018). Factors affecting writing skill using computer-assisted test (CAT) in junior high school students. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.13), 447-450.
44. Susoy, Z., & Tanyer, S. (2019). The role of vocabulary vs. syntactic knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.543787
45. Tantiwatniyom, T. & Nagaviroj, K. (2022). A study to translate and validate the thai version of the victoria respiratory congestion scale. BMC Palliative Care, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01043-x
46. Zarifi, A., & Asadpour, E. (2017). Exploring reading comprehension needs of Yasouj EAP students of Persian literature. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 5(1), 89-98.
47. Zhang, L., Zhang, L., & Liu. (2017). Metacognitive and cognitive strategy use in reading comprehension. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6325-1