EFL Students’ Perceptions of Using COCA to Develop Their Vocabulary

Year 2020, , 12 - 26, 26.12.2020

Arzu Koçak

https://doi.org/10.51726/jlr.714724

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a research study investigating students’ perceptions about the use of COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English) to expand their English vocabulary. The purpose of the study is to determine perceived benefits of using online corpora for improving EFL students’ vocabulary from the perspective of students. In the study, a group of EFL students in the Preparatory School at a state university in Turkey were introduced what a corpus is and how to use it to develop their vocabulary. The study was carried out for four weeks and the participants attended three hours of instruction each week. After each instruction, students were required to do some corpus-based vocabulary activities. The data for this research were collected via a questionnaire. At the end of the fourth week, the students reflected their perceptions about using the online corpus (COCA) in the questionnaires given. The data gathered from the study were analyzed quantitatively. The results indicated that most of the students think that using COCA as an online corpus is highly beneficial to enriching their English vocabulary. The results will supply EFL teachers with planning information about how corpora and corpus-based vocabulary activities might best be integrated into English language curriculum

Keywords

corpus, corpora, corpus-based vocabulary activities, , vocabulary, , perceptions

References

• Al Saeed, N., & Waly, S. (2009). Corpus for classrooms: Ideas for material design. Proceedings of the 10th METU ELT Convention. Ankara, Turkey.
• Barlow, M. (2002). Corpora, concordancing, and language teaching. Proceedings of the 2002 KAMALL International Conference. Daejon, Korea.
• Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
• Chao, Z. (2008). Study on English vocabulary teaching in college. US-China Foreign Language. 6 (3), 39-42.
• Conrad, S. (2000). Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly. 34, 548-560.
• Crystal, D. (1992). An encyclopedic dictionary of language and languages. Oxford, 85.
• Dash, N. S. (2003). Use of language corpora in second language learning. South Asian Language Revıew, 13 (2), 1-27.
• Feng-xia, Z. (2009). Using Lexical Approach to teach vocabulary. US-China Foreign Language. 7 (8), 44-47.
• Fligelstone, S. (1993). Some reflections on teaching from a corpus linguistics perspective. ICAME Journal. 17, 97-109.
• Krieger, D.(2003). Corpus linguistics: What it is and how it can be applied to teaching. The Internet TESOL Journal, 9 (3). Available: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Krieger-Corpus.html
• Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14 (2), 159-190.
• McCarthy, M. J. (2004). Touchstone: From corpus to course Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• McCarten, J. (2007). Teaching vocabulary. lessons from the corpus, lessons for the classroom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Neff, J., Martinez, F. & Rica, J. P. (2001). A contrastive study of qualification devices in native and nonnative argumentative texts in English. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, St. Louis, MO.
• Simpson, R. & Mendis D. (2003). A corpus-based study of idioms in academic speech. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (3), 419-441.
• Varley, S. (2008). I’ll just look that up in the concordancer: Integrating corpus consultation into the language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22 (2), 133-152.
• Walters, J. (2010). The native speakers on your computer. Paper presented at the 1st Black Sea International ELT conference, Zonguldak, Turkey.
• Willis, J. (1998). Concordances in the classroom without a computer, In Brian Tomlinson (Ed.) Materials development in language teaching, Cambridge.