Effect of Peer and Cross-Age Tutoring on Mathematics Achievement and Interest of Underachieving Gifted Students

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 11 - 19, 30.06.2023

Oluseyi Dada Roseline Ekim Dick Ekim Fagbemı Olusegun Olujıde Nneka Mbakwe Joseph Offiong

Abstract

Underachievement in the mathematics of gifted students is a disturbing issue that calls for urgent intervention. This study, therefore, investigates the effects of peer and cross-age tutoring as intervention strategies on the mathematics achievement and interest of gifted students. The pretest-posttest control group experimental research design was adopted and three null hypotheses were tested. Fifty underachieving gifted students participated in the study. The study lasted for 12 weeks. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze the data collected. Findings show that peer tutoring and cross-age tutoring are both effective in enhancing the achievement and interest in mathematics of underachieving gifted students. There is also a significant differential effect between peer and cross-age tutoring. Based on the findings, it was recommended that Mathematics teachers should adopt peer and cross-age tutoring to enhance interest and achievement in mathematics of gifted students.

Keywords

Gifted Students, Mathematics Underachievement, Mathematics, Peer Tutoring, Cross-Age Tutoring

References

• Arandale, K. L. (1977). Effects of voluntary and semi-voluntary peer-monitored programs on academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(2), 109-114.
• Awofala, A. O. A. & Lawani, A. O. (2020). Increasing Mathematics Achievement of Senior Secondary School Students through Differentiated Instruction. Journal of Educational Sciences 4 (1), 1-19.
• Britz, M. W., Dixon, J. & McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). The effects of peer tutoring on Mathematics performance: A recent review. British Journal of Special Education, 13:,17-33.
• Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A Meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
• Dada, O. A. & Akpan, S.M. (2019). Discriminant analysis of psycho-social predictors of Mathematics achievement of gifted students in Nigeria. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 647-655
• Dada, O. A. & Ani, A. U. (2019). Evaluation of instructional delivery in gifted education programme in Nigeria. International Journal of Development Research 9,(5), 27901-27907
• Dada, O. A. & Meremikwu, A. N. (2021). Identifying Mathematics underachieving gifted in classroom. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 9(3), 207-213
• Dada, O. A. & Ogundare, O. G. (2016). Socio-psychological predictors of Mathematics learning outcome of twice-exceptional children. Journal of Research and Educational development 7(1), 138-154.
• Dada, O.A. & Dada, E.O. (2014). Efficacy of co-operative and self-directed learning strategies in enhancing Mathematics achievement of underachieving gifted students in Nigeria. IORS Journal of Humanities and Social Science 19(9), 41-50
• Dada, O.A. & Fagbemi O.O. (2014). Education for the gifted/talented students in Nigeria: A justification. IISTE Journal of Education and Practice, 5 (33) 9-11
• Dada, O.A. (2010). Perception of high ability students in selected secondary schools on peer tutoring in Ibadan, Nigeria. The Exceptional Child 12(1), 117-124
• Dada, O.A. (2016). Intervention for preventing underachievement of gifted/talented child in an inclusive classroom. African Journal of Inclusive Education, 2(1), 67-74.
• Dawson, P., Vander-Meer, J., Skalicky, J., & Cowley, K. (2014). Effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A systematic review of supplemental instruction and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 609–639.
• Duran, D. (2009). Learn to cooperate from group to team. In J. I. Pozo & M. of P. Pérez. The psychology of university Learning: training in competitions. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
• Ehly, L.U. & Bratton, M. D. (2004). Principle and Methods of Teaching. Onitsha: Solomon Publishing coy. Ltd. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2004). National Policy on Education. Abuja: NERDC.
• Fogarty, E.N. & Wang, L. M. (2009). Effect of peer-mediated and self-regulated instructional model on students’ achievement and retention in Biology. Journal of Educational Studies, 12, 23-42.
• Golding, S., Lisa, F. and Tennant (2006). Effect of peer tutoring attitude and personality on academic performance of first year introductory programming students. Jamaica: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
• Heller, R. T. & Fantuzzo, M. F. (1993). Effect of peer tutoring attitude and personality on academic performance of first year introductory programming students. Jamaica: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
• Melero, M. A. & Fernandez, P. (1995). Peer learning. In P. Fernandez, & M. A. Melero (comps.). Social interaction in educational contexts. Madrid: 21st century.
• Miller, S.R. and Miller P.F. (1995). Cross-age peer tutoring: A Strategy for promoting self-Determination in Students with Severe Emotional Disabilities/Behavoiur Disorder Preventing School Failure, Educational Psychology, 39(4), 32-38.
• Nazzas, F. D. (2002). Effect of peer tutoring attitude and personality on academic performance of first year introductory programming students. Jamaica: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
• Obi, F.B. & Dada, O.A. (2015). Education for All: Inclusive education in secondary schools in Nigeria. Education for Today, 11,16-34.
• Orim, R.E., Dada, O.A. & Igwe, B. (2017). Cognitive dyscalculia and students attitudes towards learning Mathematics in Cross River State, Nigeria Special Needs Education 3, 99-110
• Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240-257.
• Rudland, S. C., & Rennie, J. R. (2014). Medical faculty opinions of peer tutoring. Educ Health. 27, 4- 9. DOI: 10.4103/1357-6283.134290
• Topping, K. J. (1996). The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in Further and Higher Education: A Typology and Review of the Literature. Higher Education, 32, 321-345.
• Topping, K. J., Peter, C., Stephen, P., & Whale, M. (2004). Cross-age tutoring of science in the primary school: Influence on scientific language and thinking. Educational Psychology, 24, 57-75.
• Torrado, D., Manrique, E., & Ayala, J. (2016). Academic performance and family context in university students. Teaching and research in psychology, 11(2), 255- 270.
• White, L.W. (2000). Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary Education: Implication from Social Psychology for Active Learning Experiences. A presentation to the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, Illinois.
• Whiteley, R.J. (1993). Encyclopedia of Sociology New York: Macmillan Reference,.U.S.A Chief Examiner Report WAEC: Why Students Perform Poorly.