Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE ROLE OF SEXUAL DESIRE ON ADVERTISING ATTRACTIVENESS AND ONLINE PURCHASE INTENTION: EVIDENCE FROM FRAGRANCE VIDEO COMMERCIALS

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 88 - 101, 31.12.2025
https://izlik.org/JA85SD27LH

Abstract

Purpose- This study was conducted to examine the relationship between signs used in voluptuous video commercials, customer perceived
attractiveness, and online purchase intention. Additionally, this study analyzed the role of individual sexual desire as a moderator in
hypothesized relationships.
Methodology- The data were collected in two phases using convenience sampling technique and judgmental sampling technique. In total,
373 valid data, collected from respondents with previous online purchasing experiences, were analyzed using structural equation modeling
(SEM).
Findings- The results revealed that signs positively influenced the customers’ perception of advertisement attractiveness (β = 0.412, p<
0.001). Furthermore, the outcomes demonstrated the positive effect of perceived advertisement attractiveness on online intention to
purchase (β = 0.126, p< 0.05). In addition, the indices indicated the positive moderating role of self-sexual desire on the relationships between
signs-perceived advertisement attractiveness and perceived advertisement attractiveness-online purchase intention (β = 0.751, p <0.001; β
= 0.218, p<0.05).
Conclusion- Despite the limitations in this study, the findings provide suggestions to practitioners and commercial designers in the perfume
industry on how to create attractive advertisements to have the desired impact on customers, focusing on the customers’ emotions and
sexual desires. The outcomes of this study contribute to the literature on advertising and online customer purchase intention.

References

  • Adomaitis, A. D., Saiki, D., & del Pozo Severino, J. (2024). Impact of sex in luxury fashion advertisements on brand attractiveness and identification. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 28(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2022-0181
  • Aguirre-Rodriguez, A., Bosnjak, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2012). Moderators of the self-congruity effect on consumer decision-making: A meta- analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1124-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.031
  • Agustia, K. T. S., & Karmini, L. A. M. (2020). The analysis of verbal and visual meanings of advertisments found at the now Bali magazine: a semantic study. Litera Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(1), 15-22.
  • Al-Adwan, A. S., Alrousan, M. K., Yaseen, H., Alkufahy, A. M., & Alsoud, M. (2022). Boosting online purchase ıntention in high-uncertainty-avoidance societies: a signaling theory approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030136
  • Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowski, J. M. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1079–1100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1079
  • Andhika Dhananjaya, P., Wandia, I. K., & Isnu Maharani, S. A. (2019). Verbal and non-verbal signs of Moana Movie Poster. Humanis. https://doi.org/10.24843/jh.2019.v23.i01.p08
  • Anglada-Tort, M., Keller, S., Steffens, J., & Müllensiefen, D. (2021). The impact of source effects on the evaluation of music for advertising are there differences in how advertising professionals and consumers judge music? Journal of Advertising Research, 61(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2020-016
  • Arief, M. (2021). Marketing Analysis: Security and public trust online shopping at shopee.co.id. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 11(2), 65-78.
  • Arief, M., Mustikowati, R. I., & Chrismardani, Y. (2023). Why customers buy an online product? The effects of advertising attractiveness, influencer marketing and online customer reviews. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/lbsjmr-
  • 09-2022-0052 Asan, K. (2022). Measuring the impacts of travel influencers on bicycle travellers. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(6), 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1914004
  • Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self- presentation. Journal of Business Research, 24, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  • Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278641
  • Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., & Kruse, J. (2016). The benefits of similarity between tourist and destination personality. Journal of Travel Research, 55(8), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515606813
  • Bower, A. B. (2001). Highly attractive models in advertising and the women who loathe them: The implications of negative affect for spokesperson effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673645
  • Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Smeaton, G. (1986). The attraction hypothesis. do similar attitudes affect anything? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 234-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1167
  • Casado-Aranda, L. A., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Montoro-Ríos, F. J. (2017). Neural correlates of voice gender and message framing in advertising: A functional MRI study. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 10(4), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000076
  • Chang, H. J. J., O’Boyle, M., Anderson, R. C., & Suttikun, C. (2016). An fMRI study of advertising appeals and their relationship to product attractiveness and buying intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(6), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1591
  • Chang, S. H., Chih, W. H., Liou, D. K., & Yang, Y. T. (2016). The mediation of cognitive attitude for online shopping. Information Technology and People, 29(3), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2014-0172
  • Chen, F., Sukpasjaroen, K., & Chankoson, T. (2022). Influence of light and color of advertising photography on consumers’ purchase intention. Innovative Marketing, 18(4), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(4).2022.18
  • Chen, M. J., Grube, J. W., Bersamin, M., Waiters, E., & Keefe, D. B. (2005). Alcohol advertising: What makes it attractive to youth? Journal of Health Communication, 10(6), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730500228904
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. In NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Dahnil, M. I., Marzuki, K. M., Langgat, J., & Fabeil, N. F. (2014). Factors Influencing SMEs Adoption of Social Media Marketing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.025
  • Dai, B., Forsythe, S., & Kwon, W. S. (2013). The impact of online shopping experience on risk perceptions and online purchase intentions: Does product category matter? Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1), 22-34.
  • Del Zotto, M., Framorando, D., & Pegna, A. J. (2020). Waist-to-hip ratio affects female body attractiveness and modulates early brain responses. European Journal of Neuroscience, 52(11), 456-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14209
  • Del Zotto, M., & Pegna, A. J. (2017). Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0498-8
  • DeShields, O. W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (1996). Source effects in purchase decisions: The impact of physical attractiveness and accent of salesperson. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00036-4
  • Dewi, N. N. Y. R., Pratiwi, D. P. E., & Santika, I. D. A. D. M. (2021). The meaning of verbal and nonverbal signs in Maybelline advertisements. Social Science, Public Administration and Management, 1(4). 167-179.
  • Eckman, M., & Wagner, J. (1994). Judging the attractiveness of product design: the effect of visual attributes and consumer characteristics. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 21-39.
  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003008
  • Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for Attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: a meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.226
  • Figl, K., Derntl, M., Rodriguez, M. C., & Botturi, L. (2010). Cognitive effectiveness of visual instructional design languages. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 21(6), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.08.009
  • Flavián, C., Gurrea, R., & Orús, C. (2017). The influence of online product presentation videos on persuasion and purchase channel preference: The role of imagery fluency and need for touch. Tele matics and Informatics, 34(8), 521-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.002
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
  • Furaji, F., Łatuszyńska, M., Wawrzyniak, A., & Wąsikowska, B. (2013). Study on the influence of advertising attractiveness on the purchase decisions of women and men. Journal of International Studies, 6(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2013/6-2/2
  • Gramazio, S., Cadinu, M., Guizzo, F., & Carnaghi, A. (2021). Does sex really sell? Paradoxical effects of sexualization in advertising on product attractiveness and purchase ıntentions. Sex Roles, 84(11–12). 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01190-6
  • Guido, G., Peluso, A. M., & Moffa, V. (2011). Beardedness in advertising: Effects on endorsers’ credibility and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260903157383
  • Ha, S. H., Bae, S. Y., & Son, L. K. (2015). Impact of online consumer reviews on product sales: Quantitative analysis of the source effect. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 9(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.12785/amis/092L12
  • Harahap, D. A., & Amanah, D. (2018). Online purchasing decisions of college students in Indonesia. In International Journal of Latest Engineering Research and Applications, 3(10), 788-801.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Herz, R. (2007). The scent of desire: Discovering our enigmatic sense of smell. New York: William Morrow/ HarperCollins.
  • HORTON, R. S. (2003). Similarity and attractiveness in social perception: differentiating between biases for the self and the beautiful. Self and Identity, 2(2),105-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309033
  • Ikawati, K., Militina, T., & Achmad, G. N. (2021). The effect of celebrity endorsers and advertising attractiveness on brand ımage and purchase decisions for tokopedia application users in Samarinda. Business and Accounting Research, 5(2),78-91.
  • Indiani, N. L. P., & Fahik, G. A. (2020). Conversion of online purchase intention into actual purchase: The moderating role of transaction security and convenience. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11346
  • Iqbal, W. (2021). Impact of perceived risk on customer’s online purchase intention towards branded apparels. Journal of Marketing Strategies, 1(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.52633/jms.v1i1.3
  • Jalilvand, M. R., Salimipour, S., Elyasi, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Factors influencing word of mouth behaviour in the restaurant industry. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 35(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-02-2016-0024
  • Jones, J. E., Jones, L. L., Calvert, M. J., Damery, S. L., & Mathers, J. M. (2022). A literature review of studies that have compared the use of face-to-face and online focus groups. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 21-34.. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221142406
  • Joseph Cronin, J., & Morris, M. H. (1989). Satisfying customer expectations: The effect on conflict and repurchase intentions in industrial marketing channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726352
  • Kergoat, M., Meyer, T., & Merot, A. (2017). Picture-based persuasion in advertising: the impact of attractive pictures on verbal ad’s content. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(7), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-01-2016-1691
  • Kiecker, P., & Cowles, D. (2002). Interpersonal communication and personal influence on the internet: A framework for examining online word-of-mouth. Journal of Euromarketing, 11(2), 102-121. https://doi.org/10.1300/J037v11n02_04
  • Kim, H., & Park, M. (2023). Virtual influencers’ attractiveness effect on purchase intention: A moderated mediation model of the Product– Endorser fit with the brand. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107703
  • Kim, W., & Cha, S. (2021). How attributes of green advertising affect purchase intention: The moderating role of consumer innovativeness. Sustainability, 13(16), 1120-1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168723
  • Kodžoman, D., Hladnik, A., Pavko Čuden, A., & Čok, V. (2022). Exploring color attractiveness and its relevance to fashion. Color Research and Application, 47(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22705
  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
  • Law, M., Kwok, R. C. W., & Ng, M. (2016). An extended online purchase intention model for middle-aged online users. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 5(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.10.005
  • Lee, E. J., & Park, J. (2014). Enhancing virtual presence in e-tail: Dynamics of cue multiplicity. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415180405
  • Lee, E. J., & Shin, S. Y. (2014). When do consumers buy online product reviews? Effects of review quality, product type, and reviewer’s photo. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.050
  • Levine, S. B. (1987). More on the nature of sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 13(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926238708403877
  • Levine, S. B. (2002). Reexploring the concept of sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262302317251007
  • Levine, S. B. (2003). The nature of sexual desire: a clinician’s perspective. In Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(3), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023421819465
  • Lim, Y. J., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S. N., Romle, A. R., & Abdullah, S. (2016). Factors ınfluencing online shopping behavior: the mediating role of purchase ıntention. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00050-2
  • Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T., & Piew, T. H. (2010). The effects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers’ online purchase ıntention. International Business Research, 3(3), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v3n3p63
  • Liu, M. T., Huang, Y. Y., & Minghua, J. (2007). Relations among attractiveness of endorsers, match-up, and purchase intention in sport marketing in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(6), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710822945
  • Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(3), 203-220.
  • Mahdavi, M., Barbosa, B., Oliveira, Z., & Chkoniya, V. (2020). Sounds of scents: olfactory-auditory correspondences in the online purchase experience of perfume. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 22(4), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i4.4083
  • Mark, K., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, D., Sanders, S., & Reece, M. (2014). The object of sexual desire: Examining the “What” in “What do you desire?” Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(11), 1445-1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12683
  • Mensing, J. (2023). Welcome to the Neuroperfumery. In Beautiful SCENT. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67259-4_4
  • Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2007). Role of electronic trust in online retailing: A re-examination of the commitment-trust theory. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9–10). 1121-1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710773390
  • Mulford, M., Orbell, J., Shatto, C., & Stockard, J. (1998). Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1086/231401
  • Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Toivonen, H. (2016). Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2014-1221
  • Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & McCabe, D. B. (2004). The effect of a delay between choice and consumption on consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1086/425085
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory’ 25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 632-645. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X004010007
  • Oputa, E. A., Fakhrorazi, A., & Islam, R. (2019). The influence of semiotic advertising efficacy on GEN-Y purchase intent: A study of reputable major brands of smart phone. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7129
  • Overmars, S., & Poels, K. (2015). Online product experiences: The effect of simulating stroking gestures on product understanding and the critical role of user control. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 3321-3340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.033
  • Pan, P. L. (2014). Toward an ıntegrated model of purchase ıntention of dietary supplements in sexually oriented advertising. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 20(2), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2012.726948
  • Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2012). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music. In The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525202.001.0001
  • Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609
  • Phau, I., & Lum, L. (2000). Effects of “physical attractiveness” in the evaluation of print advertisements. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 12(4), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850010764668
  • Phelps, J., & Thorson, E. (1991). Brand familiarity and product ınvolvement effects on the attitude toward an ad - brand attitude relationship. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(18), 3211-3229.
  • Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.48
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. In Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Reichert, T., LaTour, M. S., & Ford, J. B. (2011). The naked truth: Revealing the affinity for graphic sexual appeals in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(2), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-2-436-448
  • Roper, S., & S. Alkhalifah, E. (2020). Online shopping in a restrictive society: lessons from Saudi Arabia. Qualitative Market Research, 24(4), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-01-2020-0012
  • Schover, L. R., Fouladi, R. T., Warneke, C. L., Neese, L., Klein, E. A., Zippe, C., & Kupelian, P. A. (2002). The use of treatments for erectile dysfunction among survivors of prostate carcinoma. Cancer, 95(11), 2397-2407. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10970 Scott, J. E. (1995). The measurement of ınformation systems effectiveness: evaluating a measuring ınstrument. ACM SIGMIS Database, 26(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1145/206476.206484
  • Seifert, C., & Chattaraman, V. (2017). Too new or too complex? Why consumers’ aesthetic sensitivity matters in apparel design evaluation. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21(2), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-10-2016-0092
  • Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001
  • Şerban, S. (2014). From marketing to semiotics: the way to marketing semiotics. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 2(2), 81-93. Shaw Taylor, L., Fiore, A. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). Out of my league: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 942-954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211409947
  • Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51(11–12), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
  • Surjandy, Lisanti, Y., Meyliana, Eni, Y., Cassandra, C., & Kusumaningtyas, A. W. (2021). Analysis of product, product delivery service, and product assurance in e-commerce on purchase intention during the covid-19 pandemic. Proceedings of 2021 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9535048
  • Takahashi, C., Yamagishi, T., Tanida, S., Kiyonari, T., & Kanazawa, S. (2006). Attractiveness and cooperation in social exchange. Evolutionary Psychology, 4(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400127
  • Tian, H., Siddik, A. B., & Masukujjaman, M. (2022). Factors affecting the repurchase ıntention of organic tea among millennial consumers: an empirical study. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020050
  • Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673613
  • Torresi, I. (2008). Advertising: A case for intersemiotic translation. Meta, 53(1),34-49. https://doi.org/10.7202/017974ar
  • Van de Sompel, D., & Vermeir, I. (2016). The influence of source attractiveness on self-perception and advertising effectiveness for 6- to 7- year-old children. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(5), 312-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12302
  • van der Waldt, D. L. R., de Beer, N., & Plessis, N. du. (2007). Attitudes towards attractive and credible celebrities in advertisements: a survey amongst students. Communicare, 26(1), 41-55.
  • White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. The Journal of Sex Research, 25(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551448
  • Wiederman, M. W., & Hurst, S. R. (1997). Physical attractiveness, body image, and women’s sexual self-schema. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(4), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00131.x
  • Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900202
  • Zhong, G. (2019). E-Commerce Consumer Privacy Protection Based on Differential Privacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1168(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1168/3/032084
  • Zoghaib, A. (2017). The contribution of a brand spokesperson’s voice to consumer-based brand equity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 26(5), 445-471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2016-1230
There are 100 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Consumer Behaviour
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mohammad Karami 0000-0003-1903-828X

Sarvenaz Safavi 0000-0001-7943-4893

Nasim Ahmadzade Nobari Azar This is me 0009-0004-7674-9277

Submission Date September 11, 2025
Acceptance Date December 18, 2025
Publication Date December 31, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2019
IZ https://izlik.org/JA85SD27LH
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karami, M., Safavi, S., & Nobari Azar, N. A. (2025). THE ROLE OF SEXUAL DESIRE ON ADVERTISING ATTRACTIVENESS AND ONLINE PURCHASE INTENTION: EVIDENCE FROM FRAGRANCE VIDEO COMMERCIALS. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 12(2), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2019

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication languages of the Journal is English. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.