A HIERARCHICAL APPROACH FOR DEFINING AND CLASSIFYING CONSTRUCTS IN MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING RESEARCH: EXAMPLES FROM THE FIELD OF DYSFUNCTIONAL BEHAVIOR
Abstract
Purpose - Construct clarity and overlapping problems are obvious in management and marketing literatures. Moreover, they cause serious methodological problems. It is vital to provide meaningful definition and classification procedures for management and marketing phenomena. Current paper argues that defining and classifying constructs using hierarchical approach can provide clear and practically meaningful construct definitions and classifications.
Methodology - Current paper reviews construct definition articles in the fields of management, marketing and psychology in order to provide hierarchical construct definition and classification procedure. Authors also apply this procedure in the field of dysfunctional behavior, which has seriously suffered from construct definition overlaps.
Findings- Although previous literature tends to classify constructs dichotomously (latent constructs and observable variables), our literature review discovers more than two levels in the hierarchical abstraction-generalizability continuum, such as umbrella and bridging constructs.
Conclusion- Current paper concludes that using hierarchical criteria map for defining and classifying constructs may cause meaningful, distinct (but not disconnected) construct definitions, which clearly target real world phenomena.
Keywords
References
- Ackroyd, S., and Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational Misbehaviour: London: SAGE Publications.
- Aquino, K., and Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual review of psychology, 60 (1), 717-741.
- Babakus, E., and Boller, G. W. (1992). An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business research, 24(3), 253-268.
- Babin, B. J., and Babin, L. A. (1996). Effects of moral cognitions and consumer emotions on shoplifting intentions. Psychology and Marketing, 13(8), 785-802.
- Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational Theories: Criteria Some for Evaluation What Theory Is Not: Data, Typologies, and Metaphors, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.
- Bagozzi, R. P. (2007) On the Meaning of Formative Measurement and How It Differs from Reflective Measurement: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 229–237.
- Bagozzi, R. P. (2011). Measurement and Meaning in Information Systems and Organizational Research: Methodological and Philosophical Foundations”, MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 261–292.
- Bagozzi, R. P., and Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational research methods, 1(1), 45-87.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
March 30, 2018
Submission Date
January 14, 2018
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2018 Volume: 5 Number: 1