Research Article

Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species

Volume: 7 Number: 1 July 10, 2024
EN TR

Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species

Abstract

This study assessed the chemical composition of wild and culture-adapted golden grey mullet (Chelon auratus) and flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus). Wild samples were collected seasonally from Trabzon shores and compared to those adapted to aquaculture conditions for one year. Both species had high levels of glutamate, aspartate, alanine, leucine, and isoleucine. Mugil cephalus was a high protein source for adults, with a digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) score above 100 in both wild and culture forms. However, a DIAAS score exceeding 100 was only detected in wild Chelon auratus in the winter and spring. Both species had high levels of EPA and DHA, with Mugil cephalus having the highest lipid quality. Despite seasonal variations, cultured fish maintained a good nutritional profile similar to wild fish, especially in the autumn and summer.

Keywords

Project Number

TAGEM/HAYSUD/2015/A11/P-01/4

Ethical Statement

All animal experiments were performed according to the ARRIVE guidelines and EU directive 2010/63/EU. The study was ethically approved with the ETIK-2017/2 code by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experiments of Central Fisheries Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Republic of Türkiye.

Thanks

This work is part of a project entitled Determination of the Bioecology and Aquaculture Characteristics of the Mullet Species (Mugil cephalus, Liza aurata) in the Eastern Black Sea and supported by the Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies. [Grant number: TAGEM/HAYSUD/ 2015/A11/P-01/4]. Also, the authors would like to thank Eyüp Çakmak, Şirin Firidin and Assoc. Dr. Nazlı Kasapoğlu for assistance in sampling studies.

References

  1. Alparslan, Y., Metin, C., Yapici, H. H., Eksi, Z., Ates, Ü., & Baygar, T. (2019). Nutritional composition and fatty acid profile of commercially important mullet species in the Koycegiz Lagoon. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(4), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019598683
  2. Altuntaş, A., Çakmak, E., Firidin, Ş., Çankırılıgil, E. C., Kasapoğlu, N., Polat, H., Sağlam, H., Kurt, İ., Düzgüneş, Z. D., Beken, A. T., Alemdağ, M., Parlak, R., Haşimoğlu, A., Özel, O. T., Altuntaş, C., Küçük, E., & Eroğlu, O. (2020). Determination of the bioecology and aquaculture characteristics of the mullet species (Mugil cephalus, Liza aurata) in the Eastern Black Sea. Project Report. Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies. TAGEM/HAYSUD/ 2015/A11/P-01/4
  3. AOAC. (2000). Official methods of analysis of the AOAC International (W. Horwitz, Ed.; 17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  4. Ballantyne, J. S. (2011). Amino acid metabolism. Fish Physiology, 20, 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00002-7
  5. Bjorndal, T., & Guillen, J. (2016). Market competition between farmed and wild fish: a literature survey. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular, 1114, 22.
  6. Chen, J., & Liu, H. (2020). Nutritional indices for assessing fatty acids: A mini-review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(16), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165695
  7. Çankırılıgil, E. C., Berik, N., & Erbay, E. A. (2020). Optimization of hydrolyzation procedure for amino acid analysis in fish meat with HPLC-DAD by Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.37.2.01
  8. Çiloğlu, E. (2023). Population dynamics and stock assessment of two mullet species (Chelon auratus Risso, 1810 and Mugil cephalus Linneaus, 1758) in the Köyceğiz lagoon-estuary (Mediterranean coast). Regional Studies in Marine Science, 58, 102791. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2022.102791

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Post-Harvest Fisheries Technologies (Incl. Transportation), Aquaculture

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 10, 2024

Submission Date

June 3, 2024

Acceptance Date

June 24, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 7 Number: 1

APA
Çankırılıgil, E. C., & Altuntaş, A. (2024). Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, 7(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.1494918
AMA
1.Çankırılıgil EC, Altuntaş A. Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species. JMSF. 2024;7(1):52-66. doi:10.46384/jmsf.1494918
Chicago
Çankırılıgil, Ekrem Cem, and Ayça Altuntaş. 2024. “Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon Auratus, Mugil Cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species”. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries 7 (1): 52-66. https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.1494918.
EndNote
Çankırılıgil EC, Altuntaş A (July 1, 2024) Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries 7 1 52–66.
IEEE
[1]E. C. Çankırılıgil and A. Altuntaş, “Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species”, JMSF, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52–66, July 2024, doi: 10.46384/jmsf.1494918.
ISNAD
Çankırılıgil, Ekrem Cem - Altuntaş, Ayça. “Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon Auratus, Mugil Cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species”. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries 7/1 (July 1, 2024): 52-66. https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.1494918.
JAMA
1.Çankırılıgil EC, Altuntaş A. Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species. JMSF. 2024;7:52–66.
MLA
Çankırılıgil, Ekrem Cem, and Ayça Altuntaş. “Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon Auratus, Mugil Cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species”. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, vol. 7, no. 1, July 2024, pp. 52-66, doi:10.46384/jmsf.1494918.
Vancouver
1.Ekrem Cem Çankırılıgil, Ayça Altuntaş. Chemical Composition of Two Grey Mullet Species (Chelon auratus, Mugil cephalus): A Comparative Study on Wild and Aquaculture-Adapted Species. JMSF. 2024 Jul. 1;7(1):52-66. doi:10.46384/jmsf.1494918