BibTex RIS Cite

A Six Step Model for Successful Research In Social Sciences: FADAPA

Year 2010, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 40 - 54, 25.03.2016

Ömer Livvarçin

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

  • Alvesson, M. and Karreman D. (2007), Constructıng Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1265–1281.
  • Schendel, D. (1995). Notes from the editor-in-chief. Strategic Management Journal, 13(3), p 1-2. [3] Mintzberg, H. (2007) Developing a theory about the Development of Theory, Published in Smith, K.G. and Hitt, M.A., Great Minds of Management: the Process of Theory Developement, Oxford University Press.
  • Raan, A.F.J. (2003), The Use Of Bibliometric Analysis In Research Performance Assessment And Monitoring Of Interdisciplinary Scientific Developments, Technology Assessment-Theory and Practice, 1, 12, p. 20-29.
  • Klein, D.B. and Chiang, E. (2004), The Social Science Citation Index: A Black Box - with an Ideological Bias?, Econ Journal Watch, V 1(1), pp 134-165.
  • Osburn, C. B. (1984). The Place of The Journal In The Scholarly Communications System. Library Resources and Technical Services, 28, 315-324.
  • Dogan, M. (1999), Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye’sinde Bilimsel Gelişmeler, Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik Dergisi, 31 Temmuz 1999.
  • Ilhan, M. (2002), Atıf İndekslerine Dergi Kabul Kriterleri ve Etki Faktörü, Ed. Sait Polat, Bilimsel Araştırmaların Yazımı ve Sunumu, Conference Proceedings, Adana Çukurova University Publications: s.13-19.
  • Harter, S.P. and Kim, H.J. (1996), Electronic journals and scholarly communication: a citation and reference study, Information Research, Vol. 2 No. 1.
  • Ak, M.Z. and Gülmez A. (2006), Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Yayın Performansının Analizi, Akademik İncelemeler, Vol:1 (1)
  • Senses, F. (2004), Üniversitelerimizde Başka Sorunlarda Var, Published at World Wide
  • Senses.doc. [12] West. G. P., HI, (1997), Frameworks for Research and Theory Development in Entrepreneurship, Academy of Management Proceedings, 113-117.
  • Alvesson, M. and Karreman D. (2008), On the Social Nature of Explicating Mystery Construction in Theory Development: A Response to McKinley, Academy of Management Review, 543-545.
  • Bartunek, J., Rynes, S., & Ireland, D. 2006. Academy of Management Journal editors’ forum: What makes management research interesting and why does it matter?, Academy of Management Journal, 49: 9–15.
  • Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2000), Reflexive methodology. London: Sage
  • Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1: 309–344.
  • Dicle, A. I. (2003), Manual For Writing Research Papers Theses & Dissertations, İstanbul, Yeditepe University Publications, No: 11.
  • Hughes, W.P. (2001), What makes a good research paper? ARCOM Newsletter. 16 (3), 1-4.
  • Latour, B. (1987) Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, p:57.
  • Mehra A. (2007), Book Review of Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, edited by Ken G. Smith and Michael A. Hitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 298–312.
  • Dubin, R. (1969), Theory building. New York: Free Press.
  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 4: 490–495.
  • Sutton, R. I., and Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384.
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theory is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 385–390. [25] Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
  • McGregor R.D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998), Competitive Strategy Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, The Free Pres, New York.
  • Kalnins, A. (2007), Sample Selection And Theory Development: Implications Of Firms’ Varying Abilities To Appropriately Select New Ventures, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1246–1264.
  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Toy, B.Y. and Tosunoglu, N.G. (2007) Sosyal Bilimler Alanındaki Araştırmalarda Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci, İstatistiksel Teknikler ve Yapılan Hatalar, Journal of Commerce & Tourism Education Faculty (1), p 1-19.
  • Maslow, A. (1970), Motivation and Personality, Harper and Row Publishers, p:32.
  • Maslow, A.H. (1943), A Theory of Human Motivation, Psychological Review, 50, 370- 396.
  • Sorensen, K. (2006) Maslow's hierarchy of needs and subpersonality work. Published at World Wide Web: http://two.not2.org/psychosynthesis/articles/maslow.htm.
  • Porter, M.E. (2008), The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy, Harvard Business Review, January.

SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE BAŞARILI BİR ARAŞTIRMA İÇİN ALTI BASAMAKLI BİR MODEL: FADAPA

Year 2010, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 40 - 54, 25.03.2016

Ömer Livvarçin

Abstract

Her yıl sosyal bilimlerdeki binlerce araştırmadan sadece birkaç tanesi gerçekten başarılı olabilir. Geriye kalanların çoğunluğu ya gerektiği kadar ilgi görmez ya da çok kısa sürede unutulur. Bu araştırmanın amacı sosyal bilimlerdeki başarılı araştırmaların isterlerini belirlemek ve ortaya koymaktır. Araştırma altı altın kural önermekte ve her bir altın kuralın (İngilizcedeki) ilk harflerinden oluşan FADAPA adını verdiğimiz bir model ortaya koymaktadır. FADAPA, ilginç bir başlık seçimini ve seçilen konunun kapsamlı olarak araştırılmasını ilk iki ister olarak önermektedir. Sonraki iki önerme ise basit ve tercihen bir görsel modelin geliştirilmesini ve bu modelin mümkün olduğunca yaygın bir şekilde uygulanmasını tavsiye etmektedir. Geliştirilen modelin ve uygulama sonuçlarının yayınlanması bir sonraki öneri olarak sunulmaktadır. Son öneri olarak, modelin akademisyenler ve iş dünyası arasında reklâmının yapılması ve yaygınlaştırılması, literatürde yer edinmek isteyen araştırmacılara özelikle tavsiye edilmektedir. Modelin geçerliliğini göstermek için yazar, literatürde çok bilinen üç çalışmayı (Maslow’un İhtiyaçlar Hiyerarşisi, McGregor’un Teori X ve Y’si ve Porter’ın Beş Güç Modeli) FADAPA kuralları çerçevesinde incelemiştir

Keywords

Araştırma araştırma yöntemleri teori geliştirme araştırma modeli

References

  • Alvesson, M. and Karreman D. (2007), Constructıng Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1265–1281.
  • Schendel, D. (1995). Notes from the editor-in-chief. Strategic Management Journal, 13(3), p 1-2. [3] Mintzberg, H. (2007) Developing a theory about the Development of Theory, Published in Smith, K.G. and Hitt, M.A., Great Minds of Management: the Process of Theory Developement, Oxford University Press.
  • Raan, A.F.J. (2003), The Use Of Bibliometric Analysis In Research Performance Assessment And Monitoring Of Interdisciplinary Scientific Developments, Technology Assessment-Theory and Practice, 1, 12, p. 20-29.
  • Klein, D.B. and Chiang, E. (2004), The Social Science Citation Index: A Black Box - with an Ideological Bias?, Econ Journal Watch, V 1(1), pp 134-165.
  • Osburn, C. B. (1984). The Place of The Journal In The Scholarly Communications System. Library Resources and Technical Services, 28, 315-324.
  • Dogan, M. (1999), Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye’sinde Bilimsel Gelişmeler, Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik Dergisi, 31 Temmuz 1999.
  • Ilhan, M. (2002), Atıf İndekslerine Dergi Kabul Kriterleri ve Etki Faktörü, Ed. Sait Polat, Bilimsel Araştırmaların Yazımı ve Sunumu, Conference Proceedings, Adana Çukurova University Publications: s.13-19.
  • Harter, S.P. and Kim, H.J. (1996), Electronic journals and scholarly communication: a citation and reference study, Information Research, Vol. 2 No. 1.
  • Ak, M.Z. and Gülmez A. (2006), Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Yayın Performansının Analizi, Akademik İncelemeler, Vol:1 (1)
  • Senses, F. (2004), Üniversitelerimizde Başka Sorunlarda Var, Published at World Wide
  • Senses.doc. [12] West. G. P., HI, (1997), Frameworks for Research and Theory Development in Entrepreneurship, Academy of Management Proceedings, 113-117.
  • Alvesson, M. and Karreman D. (2008), On the Social Nature of Explicating Mystery Construction in Theory Development: A Response to McKinley, Academy of Management Review, 543-545.
  • Bartunek, J., Rynes, S., & Ireland, D. 2006. Academy of Management Journal editors’ forum: What makes management research interesting and why does it matter?, Academy of Management Journal, 49: 9–15.
  • Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2000), Reflexive methodology. London: Sage
  • Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1: 309–344.
  • Dicle, A. I. (2003), Manual For Writing Research Papers Theses & Dissertations, İstanbul, Yeditepe University Publications, No: 11.
  • Hughes, W.P. (2001), What makes a good research paper? ARCOM Newsletter. 16 (3), 1-4.
  • Latour, B. (1987) Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, p:57.
  • Mehra A. (2007), Book Review of Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, edited by Ken G. Smith and Michael A. Hitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 298–312.
  • Dubin, R. (1969), Theory building. New York: Free Press.
  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 4: 490–495.
  • Sutton, R. I., and Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384.
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theory is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 385–390. [25] Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
  • McGregor R.D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998), Competitive Strategy Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, The Free Pres, New York.
  • Kalnins, A. (2007), Sample Selection And Theory Development: Implications Of Firms’ Varying Abilities To Appropriately Select New Ventures, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1246–1264.
  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Toy, B.Y. and Tosunoglu, N.G. (2007) Sosyal Bilimler Alanındaki Araştırmalarda Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci, İstatistiksel Teknikler ve Yapılan Hatalar, Journal of Commerce & Tourism Education Faculty (1), p 1-19.
  • Maslow, A. (1970), Motivation and Personality, Harper and Row Publishers, p:32.
  • Maslow, A.H. (1943), A Theory of Human Motivation, Psychological Review, 50, 370- 396.
  • Sorensen, K. (2006) Maslow's hierarchy of needs and subpersonality work. Published at World Wide Web: http://two.not2.org/psychosynthesis/articles/maslow.htm.
  • Porter, M.E. (2008), The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy, Harvard Business Review, January.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ömer Livvarçin This is me

Publication Date March 25, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Livvarçin, Ö. . (2016). SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE BAŞARILI BİR ARAŞTIRMA İÇİN ALTI BASAMAKLI BİR MODEL: FADAPA. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering, 6(3), 40-54.