TEDARİKÇİ ÇEVİKLİĞİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR YAKLAŞIM ÖNERİSİ: OTOMOTİV SEKTÖRÜ UYGULAMASI

Year 2018, , 1 - 26, 20.04.2018

Tahsin Gündoğan , Samet Güner

https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.373479

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmanın
amacı, tedarikçi çevikliğinin ölçülmesine yönelik Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi’ne
dayalı bir yaklaşım geliştirmektir. İşletmelerin bu yaklaşımı kullanarak
tedarikçi çevikliğini ölçebilmesi ve geliştirebilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.

Yöntem:
Araştırmanın uygulaması otomotiv sektöründe yapılmış olup, bir otomobil
üreticisinin tedarikçileri hız, esneklik, bilişim teknolojileri entegrasyonu ve
işbirliği yeteneği temelinde oluşturulan çeviklik yaklaşımına göre
değerlendirilmiştir. Önerilen yaklaşım Analitik Hiyerarşi prosesi ile analiz
edilmiştir.

Bulgular:
İşletmelerin pazardaki beklenmedik ve ani durumlara karşı cevap verebilirlik
yeteneği literatürde çeviklik olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Bir işletmenin
tedarikçilerinin çevik yapıda olması, işletmenin karşılaşacağı ani ve
beklenmedik durumlara tepki vermesini kolaylaştıracaktır.

Sonuç:
Çalışmanın sonucunda, Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi’nin tedarikçi çevikliği
ölçümünde başarıyla kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir. Oluşturulan yaklaşımla,
bir otomobil üreticisinin tedarikçi performansı değerlendirilmiş ve
tedarikçilere yönelik muhtemel iyileştirme önerileri sunulmuştur.

Keywords

AHP, çeviklik, otomotiv, tedarik zinciri yönetimi

Proposal of a New Approach for Measuring Supplier Agility: An Application in Automotive Industry

Abstract

Aim: The ability of businesses to
respond to unexpected and sudden changes in markets is referred agility. The
agility of suppliers will make it easier for businesses to respond to sudden
and unexpected situations. The aim of this research is proposing a new approach
for measuring the supplier agility using Analytic Hierarchy Process. It is
intended that this approach will be used to measure and improve supplier
agility.

Method: A comprehensive literature search has
been conducted to identify the criteria that determine the supplier agility. Criteria
determined in the literature have been revised according to opinion of an
expert. The degree of importance of each criterion has been determined by
expert opinions. Analytic Hierarchy Process was used in the process of
weighting the criteria.

Findings: The Analytical Hierarchy Process
can be used as an alternative method of measuring supplier agility. It has also
been determined that the most important determiner of supplier agility is the collaboration
capability. Other factors affecting supplier agility are supplier's speed,
flexibility and information technologies.  

Results: The proposed approach is applied to
automotive industry and the suppliers of an automobile manufacturer were
evaluated according to the agility approach built on the basis of speed,
flexibility, information technology integration and collaboration capability.
Hence, supplier performance was measured and possible improvement
recommendations were presented.

Keywords

AHP, agility, automotive, supply chain management

References

• Agarwal, A. Shankar, R. ve Tiwari, M.K. (2006). Modeling the Metrics of Lean, Agile and Leagile Supply Chain: An ANP-Based Approach, European Journal of Operational research, 173: 211-225.
• Agarwal, A., Shankar, R.ve Tiwari, M.K., (2007). Modeling Agility of Supply Chain, Industrial Marketing Management, 36: 443–457.
• Aitken, J., Christopher, M. ve Towill, D., (2002). Understanding Implementing and Exploiting Agility and Leanness, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 5(1): 59−74.
• Christopher, M., (2000). The Agile Supply Chain Competing in Volatile Markets”, Industrial Marketing Management, 29: 37–44.
• Conboy, K.,(2009). Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development. Information Systems Research, 20(3):329-354.
• Conboy, K., Coyle, S., Wang, X. ve Pikkarainen, M., (2010). People Over Process: People Challenges in Agile Systems Development. IEEE Software, 28: 48-57.
• Conboy, K. ve Fitzgerald, B., (2010). Method and Developer Characteristics for Effective Agile Method Tailoring: A Study of XP Expert Opinion, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology, 20(2).
• De Groote, S.E. ve Marxcollege, T.G., (2013). The Impact of IT on Supply Chain Agility and Firm Performance: Anempirical Investigation, International Journal of Information Management, 33: 909-916.
• Dekker, A. H., (2006). Measuring the Agility of Networked Military Forces, Journal of Battlefield Technology, 9(1): 1–6.
• Elmuti, D., Minnis, W. ve Abebe, M., (2008). Longitudinal Assessment of an Integrated Industrial Supply Chain, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2): 151 – 159.
• Farrow, D., Young, W. ve Bruce, L., (2005). The Development of a Test of Reactive Agility for Netball: A New Methodology. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 8(1): 52–60.
• Gligor, D.M. ve Holcomb, M.C., (2012). Understanding the Role of Logistics Capabilities in Achieving Supply Chain Agility: A Systematic Literature Review, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4): 438 – 453.
• Gligor, D.M., Holcomb, M.C. ve Stank, T.P., (2013). A Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Agility: Conceptualization and Scale Development, Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2): 94–108.
• Gren, L., Torkara, R. ve Feldta, R., (2015). The Prospects of a Quantitative Measurement of Agility: Avalidation Study on an Agile Maturity Model, The Journal of Systems and Software, 107: 38–49.
• Gunasekaran, A.,(1999). Agile manufacturing: A Framework for Research and Development, International Journal of Production Economics, 62: 87 – 105.
• Gunasekaran, P., Patel, C. ve Tırtıroğlu, E., (2001). Performance Measures and Metrics in a Supply Chain Environment, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21: 71-87.
• Gunasekaran, A., Lai, K. ve Cheng, T.C.E., (2008). Responsive Supply Chain: A Competitive Strategy In a Networked Economy, Omega, 36: 549 – 564.
• Gülşen, A.Z., (2006). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Süreç Esneklik Konfigürasyonlarının Performans Analizi, Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Harrison, A., (1999). The Role of Agility”, Logistics Focus, pp.45-7.
• Jahanbani, E., Nasiripour, A. A., Raeissi, P. ve Tabibi, S. J. (2014). Developing a Model for Agility in Health Humanitarian Supply Chains Using Factor Analysis: Evidence From Iran, Jundishapur Journal of Health Science. 6(4): e24270.
• Jain, V., Benyoucef, L. ve Deshmukh, S.G., (2008). A New Approach for Evaluating Agility in Supply Chains Using Fuzzy Association Rules Mining, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 21(3): 367–385.
• Khan, A.K., Rajesh, K. ve Pillania, K., (2008). Strategic Sourcing For Supply Chain Agility And Firms' Performance, Management Decision, 46(10): 1508 – 1530.
• Khan, A.K., Bakkapa, B., Bhimaraya, A.M. ve Sahay, B.S., (2009). Impact of Agile Supply Chains' Delivery Practices on Firms' Performance: Cluster Analysis And Validation, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(1): 41 – 48.
• Kumar, V., Fantazy, K.A., Kumar, U. ve Boyle, T.A., (2006). Implementation and Management Framework for Supply Chain Flexibility, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(3): 303-319.
• Li, X., Chun. C., Goldsby, T. J. ve Holsapple, C. W., (2008). A Unified Model of Supply Chain Agility: The Work-Design Perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(3): 408–35.
• Li, X., Chun. C., Goldsby, T. J. ve Holsapple, C. W., (2009). Supply Chain Agility: Scale Development, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(3): 408 – 424.
• Lin, C.T., Chiu, H. ve Chu, P.Y., (2006). Agility index in the supply chain, International Journal Production Economics, 100: 285–299.
• Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K.K. ve Hua, Z. (2013). The Impact of It Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility, Decision Support Systems, 54: 1452–1462.
• Lu, Y. ve Ramamurthy, K., (2012). Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4): 931–54.
• Lummus, R.R., Vokurka. R.J. ve Duclo L.K., (2005). Delphi Study on Supply Chain Flexibility, International Journal of Produciton Research, 43(13): 2678-2708.
• Ngai, Eric. W.W., Chau, Dorothy. C.K. ve Chan, T.L.A. (2011). Information Technology, Operational and Management Competencies For Supply Chain Agility: Findings From Case Studies, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20: 232–249.
• Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A. ve Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise Agility and The Enabling Role of Information Technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15: 120-131.
• Prater, E. Biehl, M. ve Smith, M.E. (2001). International Supply Chain Agility Tradeoffs Between Flexibility and Uncertainty, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6): 823-839.
• Saaty, T.L.,(1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Saaty, R.W., (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What How It Is Used?, Matrr/d Modelling, 9(3-5): 161-176.
• Saaty, T.L. ve Özdemir, S.M., (2003). Why The Magic Number Seven Plus or Minus Two, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(3-4): 233-244.
• Sanchez, A. M., ve Perez, M., (2005). Supply Chain Flexibility and Firm Performance A Conceptual Model and Empirical Study In The Automotive Industry, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(7): 681-700.
• Sangari, M. S. ve Razmi, J., (2015). Business Intelligence Competence, Agile Capabilities and Agile Performance in Supply Chain, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2): 356 – 380.
• Sangari, M.S., Razmi, J. ve Zolfaghari, S., (2015). Developing a Practical Evaluation Framework For Identifying Critical Factors To Achieve Supply Chain Agility, Measurement, 62: 205–214.
• Sarker, S. ve Sarker, S. (2009). Exploring Agility in Distributed Information Systems Development Teams: An Interpretive Study in an Offshoring Context. Information Systems Research, 20(3): 440–461.
• Sawhney, R., (2006). Interplay Between Uncertainly and Flexibility Across The Valuechain: Towards a Transformation Model Of Manufacturing Flexibility, Journal Of Operations Management, 24: 476-493.
• Sharifi, H. ve Zhang, Z. (1999). A Methodology For Achieving Agility in Manufacturing Organisations: An Introduction, International Journal of Production Economics, 62: 7-22.
• Sharifi, H. ve Zhang, Z.,(2001). Agile Manufacturing in Practice-Application of a Methodology, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6): 772 – 794.
• Sheffer, M. J.,(2006). Awareness Through Agility: Teenagers as a Model for Terrorist Development of Situational Awareness. In: Tactical Decision Making and Situational Awareness for Defense Against Terrorism, 1–12. Meeting Proceedings RTOMP- SCI-174, Paper 5. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO. Sheppard, J. M. ve Young, W. B., (2006). Agility Literature Review: Classifications, Training and Testing. Journal of Sports Science, 24(9): 919–932.
• Sherehiy, B., Waldemar, K. ve Layer, J.K., (2007). A Review Of Enterprise Agility: Concepts, Frameworks and Attributs, International Journal of Industrial Economics, 7: 445-460.
• Swafford, P.M., Ghosh, S. ve Murthy, N. (2006). The Antecedents of Supply Chain Agility of A Firm: Scale Development And Model Testing, Journal of Operations Management, 24: 170–188.
• Swafford, P.M., Ghosh, S. ve Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving Supply Chain Agility Through IT Integration and Flexibility, International Journal of Production Economics, 116: 288–297.
• Tallon, P. P. ve Pinsonneault, A., (2011). Competing Perspectives on the Link Between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights From a Mediation Model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2): 463–86.
• Tarafdar, M. ve Qrunfleh, S.,(2016). Agile Supply Chain Strategy and Supply Chain Performance: Complementary Roles of Supply Chain Practices and Information Systems Capability For Agility, Journal International Journal of Production Research, 55(4): 925-938.
• Tse, K.Y., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P. ve Macbryde, J., (2016). Embracing Supply Chain Agility: An Investigation In The Electronics Industry, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1): 140 – 156.
• Tseng, Y. ve Lin, C., (2011). Enhancing Enterprise Agility by Deploying Agile Drivers, Capabilities and Providers. Information Sciences, 81(17): 3693–3708.
• Topoyan, M.,(2009). İşletmeler Arası Bilgi Sistemleri Kullanımının Tedarik Zinciri Esnekliği Üzerine Etkisi”, Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Türk Dil Kurumu, Güncel Türkçe Sözlük, http://tdk.gov.tr
• Wadhwa, S., Saxena, A. Ve Chan, F.T.S., (2008). Framework for Flexibility in Dynamic Supply Chain Management, International Journal of Production Research, 46(6): 1373-1404.
• White, A. Daniel, E. ve Nohdzain, M.M., (2005). The Role of Emergent Information Technologies and Systems in Enabling Supply Chain Agility, International Journal of Information Management, 25: 398-399.
• Winkler, H. (2009). How to Improve Supply Chain Flexibility Using Strategic Supply Chain Networks, Logistics Research, 1(1): 15-25.
• Wu, Y. ve Angelis, J.J. (2007). Information Technology and Supply Chain Agility in Chinese Automotive Industry, POMS 18th Annual Conference Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. May 4 to May 7, 2007.
• Xu, H. Q., Besant, C. B. ve Ristic, M. (2003). System for Enchancing Supply Chain Agility Through Expection Handling, International Journal of Production Research, 41(6): 1099-1114.
• Van Hoek, R.I., Harrison, A. ve Christopher, M.(2001). Measuring Agile Capabilities in the Supply Chain, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2): 126-147.
• Vickery, S., Calantone, R. ve Dröge, C., (1999). Supply Chain Flexibility: An Empirical Study, The Journal of Supply ChainManagement: A GlobalReview of Purchasingand Supply Copyright, 35(3): 16-24.
• Vickery, S.K., Dröge, C., Setia, P. ve Sombamurty, V., (2010). Supply Chain Information Technologies and Organizational Initiatives: Complementary Versus Independent Effects on Agility and Firm Performance, International Journal of Production Research, 48(23): 7025-7042.
• Vinodh, S. ve Prasanna, M., (2011). Evaluation of Agility in Supply Chains Using Multi-Grade Fuzzy Approach, International Journal of Production Research, 49(17): 5263-5276.
• Vinodh, S., Devadasan, S.R., Reddy, B.V. ve Ravichand, K. (2010). Agility Index Measurement Using Multi-Grade Fuzzy Approach Integrated in a 20 Criteria Agile Model, International Journal of Production Research, 48(23): 7159-7176.
• Vidal, L.A., Marle, F. ve Bocquet, J.C., (2011). Measuring Project Complexity Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal of Project Management, 29: 718–727.
• Yang, S.L. ve Li, T.F., (2002). Agility Evaluation of Mass Customization Product Manufacturing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 129,: 640–644.
• Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E.O. ve Siyayoganathan, K., (2004). Agile Supply Chain Capabilities: Determinants of Competitive Objectives, European Journal of Operational Research, 159: 379–392.
• Zhang, Z. ve Sharifi, H., (2000). A Methodology for Achieving Agility in Manufacturing Organisations, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4): 496 – 513.