Miras Dil Kavramı ve Miras Dil Konuşucuları [The Concept of Heritage Language and Heritage Language Speakers]

Year 2022, , 25 - 44, 31.05.2022

Yusuf Sen

https://doi.org/10.21488/jocas.1119793

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss the importance of the concept of heritage language, which has been emerging as a new academic field of study in a wide geography in recent years, and to explore the opportunities these studies offer to support the efforts in the field of heritage languages. The concept of heritage language has been used in Canada for many years only to refer to indigenous languages, but in recent years it has been used widely and more comprehensively for all languages that have to survive alongside a dominant language. With this new definition, immigrant and refugee languages make up the largest heritage language group. Today, educational efforts and linguistic studies related to the languages of indigenous, immigrant or refugee peoples are studied under the topic of heritage languages, which is emerging as a new interdisciplinary area within the field of Applied Linguistics. These studies and information accumulated in the study of heritage languages have the potential to inform the teaching of heritage languages at different educational institutions, the attempts to revitalize endangered languages and the linguistic study of the heritage languages and the speakers of these languages in Turkey, which is one of the heritage language rich countries.

Keywords

heritage language, language erosion, language revitalization, dominant languages, endangered languages

Miras Dil Kavramı ve Miras Dil Konuşucuları [The Concept of Heritage Language and Heritage Language Speakers]

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı son yıllarda geniş bir coğrafyada akademik bir çalışma çalışma alanı olarak ta ortaya çıkan miras dil kavramının önemini ve bu alandaki çalışmaların miras dil alanında gösterilen çabaları destekleme konusunda sunduğu imkanları incelemektir. Miras dil kavramı, Kanada’da uzun yıllar sadece yerli halk dillerini ifade etmek için kullanıldıktan sonra, son yıllarda daha yaygın ve daha kapsayıcı olarak yerli halk dillerinin yanı sıra baskın bir dilin yanında varlığını sürdürmek durumunda olan bütün diller için kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu geniş tanım ile miras dil grubunu oluşturan en büyük dil grubu göç veya iltica sonucu baskın dillerin yanında yaşamak durumunda kalan miras diller olmuştur. Günümüzde büyük ölçüde yerli, göçmen veya mülteci halkların dilleri ile ilgili eğitim-öğretim çabaları ve dilbilimsel çalışmalar, Uygulamalı Dilbilim alanı içinde yeni bir disiplinlerarası alan olarak ortaya çıkmakta olan miras dil ve miras dil konuşucuları başlıkları altında çalışılmakta ve tartışılmaktadır. Bu alanda son yıllarda yoğun olarak ortaya konan çalışmalar ve bilgi birikimi miras diller açısından oldukça zengin olan Türkiye’de miras dillerin farklı kurumlarda öğretimi, yok olma tehlikesi ile karşı karşıya olan birçok miras dilin tekrar canlılık kazanması çabalarını ve miras dillerin ve bu dilleri konuşanların dilbilimsel olarak incelenmesi çalışmalarını destekleyecek imkanlar sunmaktadır.

Keywords

miras dil, dil aşınımı, dillerin yeniden canlandırılması, baskın diller, tehlike altındaki diller

References

• Baker, Colin ve Sylvia Prys Jones. Encyclopedia of bilingual education and bilingualism, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 1998.
• Bayram, Fatih. Studies in Turkish as a Heritage Language (Ed.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2020.
• Benmomoun, Ellabas ve Silvina Montrul ve Maria Polinsky. “Heritage languages and their speakers: Opprtunities and challenges for linguists”. Theoretical Linguistics 39.3-4 (2013): 129-181
• Chomsky, Noam. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.
• Cummins, Jim. “A Proposal for Action: Strategies for Recognizing Heritage Language Competence as a Learning Resource within the Mainstream Classroom" Modern Language Journal, 89, (2005): 585-592.
• Fishman, Joshua. “300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States”. Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource Ed. Joy Kreeft Peyton., Donald A. Ranard, ve Scott McGinnis. Washington, DC: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics, 2001. 81–98.
• Gessner, Suzanne, Tracey Herbert Aliana Parker. “Indigenous languages in Canada” Heritage Language Policies around the World. Eds. Corinne A. Seals and Sheena Shah. Oxon: Routledge 2018, 30-47.
• Holmes, Janet. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Fourth Edition. London: Routledge, 2013.
• Hymes, Dell H. “On Communicative Competence” Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings. Ed. John Bernard Pride ve Janet Holmes. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972. 269-293.
• Kupisch, Tanja, Rothman, Jason. “Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers”. International Journal of Bilingualism 22,5 (2018): 564-582.
• Leeman, Jennifer, Lisa Rabin ve Esparanza Roman-Mendoza. “Identity and Activism in Heritage Language Education.” The Modern Language Journal, 95, 4 (2011): 481-49.
• Montrul, Silvina. “Introduction: The Linguistic Competence of Heritage Speakers”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. SPECIAL ISSUE: The Linguistic Competence of Heritage Speakers. 33, 2, 2011. 155-161.
• Montrul, Silvina. “Current Issues in Heritage Language Acquisition”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30 (2010). 3-23
• Nemlioğlu-Nemerko, M. Uğur. “The demographics and interest of the circassian language and literature students in circassian language” Demografičeskie osobennosti i interes studentov otdelenija adygejskogo jazyka i literatury k izučeniju adygejskogo jazyka // Jazyk, pisʹmennostʹ i alfavit: aktualʹnye problemy ih vzaimodejstvija. K 170-letiju adygejskogo prosvetitelja XIX veka, sostavitelja alfavita Hadžibeča Šahančerieviča Ančoka. Materialy Meždunarodnoj naučno-praktičeskoj konferencii. Maykop: (26-27 Ekim, 2016) 191-198
• Peyton, Joy Kreeft, Donald A. Ranard, ve Scott McGinnis. “On defining heritage languages and their speakers”. Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource Ed. Joy Kreeft Peyton., Donald A. Ranard, ve Scott McGinnis, 29-36. Washington, DC: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics 2001.
• Polinsky, Maria. Heritage Languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
• Rothman, Jason. “Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages”. International Journal of Bilingualism 13, 2 (2009): 155–163.
• Scontros, Gregory, Zuzana Fuchs ve Maria Polinsky. “Heritage Language and Linguistic Theory” Frontiers in Psychology 6,1545, (2015): 1-20.
• Valdes, Guadalupe. “Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost orseized?” Modern Language Journal, 89, (2005): 410–426.
• Valdez, Guadalupe. “Heritage language speakers”. Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource Ed. Joy Kreeft Peyton., Donald A. Ranard, ve Scott McGinnis. Washington, DC: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics 2001. 37–77.
• Wiley, Terrence G. “On defining heritage languages and their speakers.” Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource Düz. Joy Kreeft Peyton, Donald A. Ranard, ve Scott McGinnis. Washington, DC: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics. 2001, 29-36.
• Wiley, Terrence G. “The Reemergence of Heritage and Community Language Policy in the U.S. National Spotlight” Modern Language Journal, 89, (2005): 594-601.
• Wardough, Ronald. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 2013.