Clinical Research
BibTex RIS Cite

Vertebral Kompresyon Kırıklarının Perkütan Kifoplasti ile Tedavisinde Anestezi Yöntemlerinin Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 241 - 249, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1140974

Abstract

Amaç: Kifoplasti , vertebral kompresyon kırıklarında ağrıyı hafifletmeye ve yapısal bütünlüğü güçlendirmeye yardımcı olabilen perkütan girişimsel bir prosedürdür. Bu işlem için farklı anestezi teknikleri kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada PKP için ideal anestezi tekniğinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.
Materyal ve Metot: Prospektif, randomize olmayan çalışmamız Ocak 2022-Haziran 2022 arasında gerçekleştirildi. Hastalar genel anestezi grubu, lokal anestezi grubu, epidural anestezi grubu olarak üç gruba ayrıldı. Perioperatif ağrı ve komplikasyonlar değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Merkezimizde vertebral kompresyon kırığı nedeniyle peruktan kifoplasti uygulanan 40 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Genel anestezi altında operasyon geçiren hasta sayısı çok az olduğundan ilgili hasta grubu sadece tanımlayıcı istatistiklerde gösterilip karşılaştırma istatistiklerinde değerlendirmeye alınmadı. Lokal anestezi grubunda tüm zamanlama noktalarında katlanılabilir ağrı yaşanırken %25 oranında ciddi komplikasyon yaşandı. 4 hastanın ameliyat sonrası yoğun bakım takibi ihtiyacı oldu. Epidural anestezi grubunda trokar girişi sırasında ağrı yaşanırken (ort görsel analog skala=2), diğer zamanlamalarda ağrı yaşanmadı. Komplikasyon oranı lokal anestezi grubundan düşük, yoğun bakım takip ihtiyacı yoktu.
Sonuç: Epidural anestezi, peruktan kifoplasti için güvenli bir anestezi tekniğidir. Postoperatif analjezi, düşük komplikasyon oranı ve ameliyat sonrası yoğun bakım ünitesi ihtiyacı ile ilgili olarak lokal anesteziden avantajlıdır. Fakat anestezi uygulama süresi ve maliyet açısından dezavantajlıdır. Komorbidetesi yüksek, tek seviye peruktan kifoplasti operasyonlarında uygun bir anestezi tekniği olarak düşünülebilir.

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

yok

Thanks

yok

References

  • 1- Chandra RV, Maingard J, Asadi H, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: what are the latest data?. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020;39(5):798-806.
  • 2- Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Adachi JD, et al. Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993; 36(6):750-756.
  • 3- Denaro V, Longo UG, Maffulli N, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism. 2009;6(2):125-130.
  • 4- Fuentes S, Metellus P, Fondop J,et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Neuro-chirurgie. 2007;53(4): 272-276.
  • 5- Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, et al. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2009;373(9668): 1016-1024.
  • 6- Ma XL, Xing D, Ma JX,et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Spine Journal. 2012;21(9):1844-1859.
  • 7- Wiles MD, Nowicki RW, Hancock SM, et al. Anaesthesia for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care. 2009;20(1): 38-41.
  • 8- Ge C, Wu X, Gao Z, et al. Comparison of different anesthesia modalities during percutaneous kyphoplasty of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Scientific Reports.2021; 11(1): 1-7. 9- Alfahel WS, Dabbous AS, Thompson ME. Epidural analgesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty in a patient with multiple medical comorbidities. Avicenna Journal of Medicine.2019; 9(02):75-77.
  • 10- Souvatzis X, Katonis PG, Licoudis SA, et al. Subarachnoid anesthesia for kyphoplasty: is anesthesia adequate?. Anesthesia & Analgesia.2010; 111(1):238-240.
  • 11- Hannallah M, Gibby E, Watson V. Fluoroscopy-guided, small-dose spinal anesthesia for kyphoplasty: A collaborative effort between the anesthesiologist and interventional radiologist. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1329–30.
  • 12- Ergün MO, Güvenç Y . Comparison of the Effectiveness of Anesthesia Methods on Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Anesthesia. Istanbul Medical Journal. 2022; 23(2): 149-53.
  • 13- Liu J, Wan L, Chai M, et al. Analysis of anesthesia methods in percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Healthc Eng. 2020;(1) 9;2020:3965961.
  • 14- Ge C, Wu X, Gao Z, et al. Comparison of different anesthesia modalities during percutaneous kyphoplasty of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Scientific Reports.2021; 11(1), 1-7.
  • 15- Zhang LG, Gu X, Zhang HL, et al. Unilateral or bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a prospective study. Clinical Spine Surgery.2015; 28(2), 85-88.
  • 16- Luginbühl M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty and lordoplasty: implications for the anesthesiologist. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2008;21(4), 504-513.
  • 17- Vasconcelos C, Gailloud P, Beauchamp NJ, et al. Is percutaneous vertebroplasty without pretreatment venography safe? Evaluation of 205 consecutives procedures. American Journal of Neuroradiology.2002; 23(6), 913-917.
  • 18- Ohara T, Takahashi M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Use of propofol for painful procedures in cancer pain management. Masui. The Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology.2003; 52(7), 740-743.
  • 19- Civelek E, Cansever T, Yilmaz C, et al. The retrospective analysis of the effect of balloon kyphoplasty to the adjacent-segment fracture in 171 patients. Clinical Spine Surgery.2014; 27(2), 98-104. 20- Apan A., Apan ÖC, Köse EA. Segmental epidural anesthesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty: Comparison with general anesthesia. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences.2016; 46(6), 1801-1807.
  • 21- Guay J, Choi PT, Suresh S, et al. Neuraxial anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews. Anesth Analg. 2014; 119(3), 716-725.
  • 22- Wang W, Ni BB, Shen H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of lumbar disc herniation using local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99(33),18958.
  • 23- Albayrak S, Demırel I, Ayden O, et al. Lumbar disc surgery with epidural anesthesia: review of 700 cases. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2016;26(3).399-403.
Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 241 - 249, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1140974

Abstract

Project Number

yok

References

  • 1- Chandra RV, Maingard J, Asadi H, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: what are the latest data?. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020;39(5):798-806.
  • 2- Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Adachi JD, et al. Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993; 36(6):750-756.
  • 3- Denaro V, Longo UG, Maffulli N, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism. 2009;6(2):125-130.
  • 4- Fuentes S, Metellus P, Fondop J,et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Neuro-chirurgie. 2007;53(4): 272-276.
  • 5- Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, et al. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2009;373(9668): 1016-1024.
  • 6- Ma XL, Xing D, Ma JX,et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Spine Journal. 2012;21(9):1844-1859.
  • 7- Wiles MD, Nowicki RW, Hancock SM, et al. Anaesthesia for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care. 2009;20(1): 38-41.
  • 8- Ge C, Wu X, Gao Z, et al. Comparison of different anesthesia modalities during percutaneous kyphoplasty of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Scientific Reports.2021; 11(1): 1-7. 9- Alfahel WS, Dabbous AS, Thompson ME. Epidural analgesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty in a patient with multiple medical comorbidities. Avicenna Journal of Medicine.2019; 9(02):75-77.
  • 10- Souvatzis X, Katonis PG, Licoudis SA, et al. Subarachnoid anesthesia for kyphoplasty: is anesthesia adequate?. Anesthesia & Analgesia.2010; 111(1):238-240.
  • 11- Hannallah M, Gibby E, Watson V. Fluoroscopy-guided, small-dose spinal anesthesia for kyphoplasty: A collaborative effort between the anesthesiologist and interventional radiologist. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1329–30.
  • 12- Ergün MO, Güvenç Y . Comparison of the Effectiveness of Anesthesia Methods on Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Anesthesia. Istanbul Medical Journal. 2022; 23(2): 149-53.
  • 13- Liu J, Wan L, Chai M, et al. Analysis of anesthesia methods in percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Healthc Eng. 2020;(1) 9;2020:3965961.
  • 14- Ge C, Wu X, Gao Z, et al. Comparison of different anesthesia modalities during percutaneous kyphoplasty of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Scientific Reports.2021; 11(1), 1-7.
  • 15- Zhang LG, Gu X, Zhang HL, et al. Unilateral or bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a prospective study. Clinical Spine Surgery.2015; 28(2), 85-88.
  • 16- Luginbühl M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty and lordoplasty: implications for the anesthesiologist. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2008;21(4), 504-513.
  • 17- Vasconcelos C, Gailloud P, Beauchamp NJ, et al. Is percutaneous vertebroplasty without pretreatment venography safe? Evaluation of 205 consecutives procedures. American Journal of Neuroradiology.2002; 23(6), 913-917.
  • 18- Ohara T, Takahashi M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Use of propofol for painful procedures in cancer pain management. Masui. The Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology.2003; 52(7), 740-743.
  • 19- Civelek E, Cansever T, Yilmaz C, et al. The retrospective analysis of the effect of balloon kyphoplasty to the adjacent-segment fracture in 171 patients. Clinical Spine Surgery.2014; 27(2), 98-104. 20- Apan A., Apan ÖC, Köse EA. Segmental epidural anesthesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty: Comparison with general anesthesia. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences.2016; 46(6), 1801-1807.
  • 21- Guay J, Choi PT, Suresh S, et al. Neuraxial anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews. Anesth Analg. 2014; 119(3), 716-725.
  • 22- Wang W, Ni BB, Shen H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of lumbar disc herniation using local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99(33),18958.
  • 23- Albayrak S, Demırel I, Ayden O, et al. Lumbar disc surgery with epidural anesthesia: review of 700 cases. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2016;26(3).399-403.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Anaesthesiology
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hamide Ayben Korkmaz 0000-0002-2845-0586

Ahmet Karaoğlu 0000-0002-2992-7980

İlkay Ceylan 0000-0003-3306-3107

Project Number yok
Early Pub Date August 18, 2022
Publication Date August 31, 2022
Acceptance Date August 17, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Korkmaz, H. A., Karaoğlu, A., & Ceylan, İ. (2022). Vertebral Kompresyon Kırıklarının Perkütan Kifoplasti ile Tedavisinde Anestezi Yöntemlerinin Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences, 5(2), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1140974

download

You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.