Kurumsal Strateji Çalışmalarının Entelektüel Yapısı: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, kurumsal strateji üzerine yapılan yayınların bibliyometrik analizi yoluyla alanın entelektüel yapısının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, bibliyometrik analizin iki temel tekniği olan performans analizi ve bilimsel haritalama yöntemleri kullanılarak Web of Science (WoS)/Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) veri tabanından elde edilen 1023 yayına ait araştırma alanının görünümü ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. 1980’den itibaren günümüze kadar görgül çalışmaların ağırlıklı olduğu, geniş ve gelişmiş bir araştırma alanının bulunduğu görülmektedir. Kurumsal strateji alanında kaynak temelli yaklaşım, vekâlet kuramı ve kurumsal yönetişim ekseninde temellendirilen büyüme ve çeşitlendirme stratejilerine ilişkin araştırmaların ağırlık kazandığı görülse de 2000’li yıllardan itibaren gelişen pazarlarda işletme grupları, satınalmalar, inovasyon, dijitalleşme, uluslararasılaşma ve sürdürülebilirlik gibi temaların alanın güncel gündemini oluşturduğu görülmektedir. Bu çerçevede kurumsal strateji alanında, gelişen pazarlarda uluslararasılaşma, inovasyon, dijitalleşme, sürdürülebilirlik, birleşme ve satınalmalar ve organik büyüme stratejilerini konu edinen çalışmaların görece zayıf kaldığı ve bu alanda bir boşluk olduğu belirtilebilir. Kurumsal stratejilerin örgütlerin bekasını belirlemesi sebebiyle bu alanda güncel temalı araştırma alanının ilerletilmesinin örgütlerin yönetimine katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Kurumsal Strateji
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Faaliyet Endeksi
• Performans Analizi
• Bilimsel Haritalama

The Intellectual Structure of Corporate Strategy Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the intellectual structure of the field through a bibliometric analysis of publications on corporate strategy. For this purpose, performance analysis and scientific mapping methods, two basic techniques of bibliometric analysis, were used to reveal the view of the research field of 1023 publications obtained from the Web of Science (WoS)/Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) database. It is seen that there is a wide and developed research field with a predominance of empirical studies since 1980 until today. In the field of corporate strategy, research on growth and diversification strategies based on resource-based approach, agency theory and corporate governance has gained weight, but since the 2000s, themes such as business groups, acquisitions, innovation, digitalization, internationalization and sustainability in emerging markets have been the current agenda of the field. In this framework, it can be stated that the studies on internationalization, innovation, digitalization, mergers and acquisitions, sustainability, and organic growth strategies in the field of corporate strategy in emerging markets are relatively weak and there is a gap in this field. Since corporate strategies determine the survival of organizations, it is thought that advancing the current thematic research area in this field will contribute to the management of organizations.

Keywords

• Corporate Strategy
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Activity Index
• Performance Analysis
• Scientific Mapping

References

1. Ackoff, R. (1970). A concept of corporate planning. Long Range Planning, 3(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(70)90031-2
2. Alcacer, J., Collis, D. & Sadun, R. T. (2021). The strategy course at top business schools. Working Paper. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School,
3. Alparslan, A. M. & Çarıkçı, İ. H. (2013). İşletmede strateji oluşturma yaklaşımlarını değerlendirmeye yönelik bir vaka çalışması, Istanbul Management Journal, 25(76), 1-33.
4. Andrews, K. R. (1971). Concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
5. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Ansoff, H. I. (1982). Strategic management. London: Macmillan.
7. Ansoff, I. H. (1987). The emerging paradigm of strategic behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 8(6), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080602
8. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

9. Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231
10. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
11. Batagelj, V. & Mrvar, A. (2003). Pajek - Analysis and visualization of large networks. M. Jünger, P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software. (s. 77-103). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18638-7_4
12. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics 12(5-6), 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
13. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. (1998). Creating corporate advantage. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 70–83.
15. Donthu, N., Satish, K., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(C), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
16. Eren, E. (2010). Stratejik yönetim ve işletme politikası. 8. Baskı, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım.
17. Feldman, E. R. (2020). Corporate strategy: Past, present, and future. Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 179-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/111.00000002
18. Fuchs, J. E. & Tunger, D. (2023). Leveling the AI - Changes to the activity index considered depending on hierarchical levels. Research Square, (Version 1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2676683/v1
19. Glueck, W. F. (1980). Business policy and strategic management, Third Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Gülmez, D., Özteke, I. & Gümüş, S. (2020). Overview of educational research from Turkey published in international journals: A bibliometric analysis. Education and Science, 46(206), 213-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9317
21. Hofer, C. W. & Schendel, D. (1978) Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. Minnesota: West Publishing Company.
22. Hunter, P. (2020). Corporate strategy (Remastered) I: High performance strategy and leadership in a volatile, disrupted world. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287350
23. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Manage­rial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
24. Knights, D. & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organisation Studies,12(2), 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840691012002
25. Mendes, M. V. I. (2018). The winding road of corporate strategy. Revista Pensamento Contemporaneo em Administraçao, 12(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v12i1.1124
26. Menz, M., Kunisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Collis, D. J., Foss, N. J., Hoskisson, R. E. & Prescott, J. E. (2021). Corporate strategy and the theory of the firm in the digital age. Journal of Management Studies, 58(7), 1695-1720. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12760
27. Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9) 934-948.
29. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934
30. Mintzberg, H. & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(2), 160-197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393104
31. Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J. A. (1982) Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 465-499. https://doi.org/10.2307/256075
32. Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060306
33. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari. New York, NY: Free Press.
34. Mitnick, B. M. (1973). Fiduciary rationality and public policy: the theory of agency and some consequences. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, 1-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1020859
35. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Pettigrew, A. (1985). Examining change in the long-term context of culture and politics. J. M. Pennings (Ed.), Organizational strategy and change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
37. Pettigrew, A. (1985a). The awakening giant. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Pettigrew, A. (1985b). Contextualist research: A natural way to link theory and practice. E. Lawler et al. (Eds.), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. (s. 222-274). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
39. Pettigrew, A. (1986). Is corporate culture manageable. Centre for Corporate Strategy and Change Working Paper. University of Warwick.
40. Pettigrew, A. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00467.x
41. Pettigrew, A. (1988). The management of strategic change. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Pfeffer, J. ve Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
43. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
44. Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 43-59.
45. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
46. Robbins, S. P. & Coulter, M. (2011). Management. Eleventh Edition, USA: Prentice Hall.
47. Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134-139. https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/top20/63.2.134-139.pdf
48. Rowe, A. J., Dickel, K. E., Mason, R. O. & Snyder, N. H. (1989). Strategic management: A methodological approach, Third Edition, New York: Addison-Wesley.
49. Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance in large american ındustrial corporations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030407
51. Rumelt, R., Schendel, D. & Teece, D. (1994). Fundamental issues in strategy, A research agenda. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
52. Steiner, G. A. (1979). Strategic planning: What every manager must know. Michigan: Free Press.
53. Thavamani, K. (2015). Bibliometric study of literature on leptospirosis for the period 2006-2013. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7(11), 1-21. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1253
54. Ülgen, H. & Mirze, K. (2014). İşletmelerde stratejik yönetim, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayın.
55. Ürü Sanı, F. O. (2018). Stratejik açıdan yönetim. A. Akdemir (Ed.), Örgütlerin yönetimi (s. 401-453), İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım.
56. Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
57. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Manage­ment Journal, 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
58. Wheelen, T. L. & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic management and business policy. Thirteeenth Edition, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
59. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
60. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press
61. Zupic, I. & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629