Education Informatics Network-Based Blended Learning in High School English as a Foreign Language Context

Abstract

The primary purpose of the present study is to ascertain high school students' perceptions of the efficacy of blended learning in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classes based on the Education Informatics Network (EIN) which is used as a learning management system in Turkish K-12 schools. The sample of the study was composed of 122 EFL students studying at a state high school. The study was designed with a convergent research design, one of the mixed-methods research designs. Quantitative findings showed that students' general views on EIN-based blended learning were neutral, yet positive about face-to-face lessons. The obtained qualitative findings mostly converged with the quantitative data results, and they clarified that students had both positive and negative opinions about the impact of blended learning on the development of language skills, assessment, learner autonomy, and classroom atmosphere. Furthermore, interview findings indicated that students expected the EIN portal to be free of technical problems, easily accessible and to include more enjoyable and various activities for a better implementation of the EIN-based blended learning. Lastly, several suggestions for further research were put forward as well as some educational implications for teaching EFL in an EIN-based blended learning environment.

Keywords

• Blended learning
• Educational technologies
• EFL
• EIN
• Students’ perceptions

References

1. Ahmed, A. M. (2019). Effects and students’ perspectives of blended learning on English/Arabic translation. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 50-80. Retrieved from https://arjals.com/ajal/article/view/175
2. Akkoyunlu, B., & Yilmaz-Soylu, M. (2008). Development of a scale on learners' views on blended learning and its implementation process. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.12.006
3. Aksel, A. (2021). A study on the effectiveness of a blended learning model in English language learning in higher education: student attitudes and opinions. Uludag University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Bursa, Turkiye. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 675649
4. Alabay (2017). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin ve öğrencilerinin EBA (Eğitimde Bilişim Ağı) kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri üzerine bir araştırma. [An investigation into secondary school students’ and teachers’ opinions on the use of EIN (Education Informatics Network)]. İstanbul Aydın University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye. (Master’s dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 407060.
5. Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Eddin, E. A. B., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL students' perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations, and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p95
6. Avci, H., & Adiguzel, T. (2017). A case study on mobile-blended collaborative learning in an English as a foreign language (EFL) context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3261
7. Bahce, A., & Taslaci, N. (2009). Learners’ perception of blended writing class: Blog and face-to-face. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(4), 188-202.
8. Balci, E. (2017). Perceptions on blended learning: a study on student and instructor experiences in an English preparatory program. Pamukkale University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Denizli, Turkiye. (Master’s dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 454676.

9. Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing students’ language skills through blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 223-232.
10. Bataineh, R. F., & Mayyas, M. B. (2017). The utility of blended learning in EFL reading and grammar: A case for Moodle. Teaching English with Technology, 17(3), 35-49. Retrieved from http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-7e1de866-5aea-4fe8-a7f0-5310d665d1fb
11. Bitlis, O. (2011). A blended learning environment in relation to learner autonomy. Bilkent University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkiye. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 289871.
12. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed-methods research. (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
14. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
15. Douglas, I., & Alemanne, N. D. (2007). Measuring student participation and effort. In IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, 2007 (pp. 299-302). Algarve, Portugal. Retrieved from https://jgregorymcverry.com/readings/Douglas2007Measuring_student_participation_and_effort.pdf
16. Dornyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135. https://doi:10.1017/S026144480001315X
17. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Ehsanifard, E., Ghapanchi, Z., & Afsharrad, M. (2020). The impact of blended learning on speaking ability and engagement. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), 253. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.17.253
19. Fis-Erumit, S. (2021). The distance education process in K–12 schools during the pandemic period: evaluation of implementations in Turkey from the student perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1856178
20. Foreman, S. (2017). The LMS guidebook: Learning management systems demystified. USA: ATD Press.
21. Gamble, C. (2018). Exploring EFL university students’ acceptance of e-learning using TAM. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 22, 23-37.
22. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
23. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 299-307. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/329956
24. Graham, C.R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C.J. Bonk. & C.R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
25. Guclu, R. (2018). An investigation of integrated skills practices and blended learning in English classes. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkiye. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 494338.
26. Herra, A., & Kulińska, A. (2018). The role of feedback in the process of learning English as a foreign language. Forum Filologiczne Ateneum, 6(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.36575/2353-2912/1(6)2018.127
27. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Using blended learning: Evidence-based practices (Vol. 20). Singapore: Springer. https://doi:10.1007/978-981-287-089-6
28. Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. Sage. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
29. Hos, R., Yagci, H., & Cinarbas, H. I. (2016). Turkish EFL students’ perceptions about blended English courses in a teacher education program. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2(3), 774-784. https://doi:10.24289/ijsser.279022
30. Huang, Q. (2016). Learners' perceptions of blended learning and the roles and interaction of f2f and online learning. Ortesol Journal, 33, 14-33. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/learners-perceptions-blended-learning-roles/docview/1942218954/se-2
31. Huang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a design theory of blended learning curriculum. In International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Education, 2008 (pp. 66-78). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
32. Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2021). Understanding feedback in online learning–A critical review and metaphor analysis. Computers & Education, 173, 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104271
33. Kalemkus, F. (2016). Ortaöğretimdeki öğretmen ve öğrencilerin eğitim bilişim ağı (EBA)’ya ilişkin görüşleri. [Opinions of secondary school teachers’ and students’ towards Education Informatics Network (EBA)]. (Master’s dissertation). Afyon Kocatepe University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Afyon, Turkiye. Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 434917.
34. Kilic, A. (2020). A study on improving EFL learners' listening skills through education informatics network (EBA) and identifying learners' perceptions towards the platform. Bursa Uludag University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Bursa, Turkiye. (Master’s dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 666799.
35. Lewis, B. A., MacEntee, V. M., DeLaCruz, S., Englander, C., Jeffrey, T., Takach, E., ... & Woodall, J. (2005). Learning management systems comparison. In Proceedings of the 2005 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference 2005 (pp. 17-29).
36. McCarthy, M. (Ed.). (2016). The Cambridge guide to blended learning for language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
37. Ministry of National Education-MoNE (2007). Temel eğitim projesi II. fazı. BT entegrasyonu temel araştırması [Phase II of the basic education project. IT integration basic research]. Retrieved August 21, 2023 from https://ocw.metu.edu.tr/pluginfile.php/3298/course/section/1180/BT%20Entegrasyonu.pdf
38. Ministry of National Education-MoNE (2022). FATIH project. Retrieved June 15, 2022 from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/en/about.html
39. Ministry of National Education-MoNE (2018). Ortaöğretim İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı [Secondary school English curriculum]. Retrieved May 10, 2022 from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=342&ysclid=llkz53gw25430351688
40. Ministry of National Education-MoNE (2018). 2023 eğitim vizyonu [ Turkiye’s education vision 2023]. Retrieved May 7, 2022 from https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/2023_E%C4%9Fitim%20Vizyonu.pdf
41. Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185-199. https://doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006
42. Mohamed, F. A. E. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning in enhancing EFL learning and collaboration. World Journal of English Language, 12(1), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n1p92
43. Newhouse, C. P. (2011). Using IT to assess IT: Towards greater authenticity in summative performance assessment. Computers & Education, 56(2), 388-402. https://10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.023
44. Oztas, E. (2022). Turkish students’ perception of blended learning in EFL and higher education context. Cag University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Mersin, Turkiye. (Master’s dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 740769.
45. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
46. Pehlivan, D. S. (2020). The use of EBA (education information network) in teaching vocabulary and grammar to EFL young learners. Mugla Sıtkı Kocaman University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Mugla, Turkiye. (Master’s dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 627798.
47. Purnawarman, P., Susilawati, S., & Sundayana, W. (2016). The use of Edmodo in teaching writing in a blended learning setting. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 242-252. https://doi:dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1348
48. Rachman, L. A., Sudiyono, S., & Phonix, E. (2021). The blended learning implementation of ELT based on teachers and students’ perspective in new normal condition of Covid 19. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(3), 457-468. https://10.22460/project.v4i3.p457-468
49. Rianto, A. (2020). Blended learning application in higher education: EFL learners' perceptions, problems, and suggestions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.231-256
50. Rojabi, A. R. (2019). Blended learning via schoology as a learning management system in reading class: benefits and challenges. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 9 (2), 36-42.
51. Sabat, Y., Madya, S., Basikin, B., & Syakur, A. (2022). Blended learning model (BLM) in English pronunciation class: Lesson from Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 5(1), 6428-6440. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4365
52. Sahin-Kizil, A. (2014). Blended instruction for EFL learners: Engagement, learning and course satisfaction. JALT CALL Journal, 10(3), 175-188. https://doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v10n3.174
53. Sheet, M. M. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of blended learning programs on developing the writing skills of university students: A case study. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Publication No. 28151985).
54. Snodin, N. S. (2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by individual learners. Computers & Education, 61, 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.004
55. Tuysuz, C., & Cumen, V. (2016). EBA ders web sitesine ilişkin ortaokul öğrencilerinin görüşleri. [Middle school students’ views towards EBA course website]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(27/3), 278-296. https://doi:10.26579/jocress.377
56. Wang, N., Chen, J., Tai, M., & Zhang, J. (2021). Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: Learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 297-323. https://doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881
57. Wong, K. T., Hwang, G. J., Choo Goh, P. S., & Mohd Arrif, S. K. (2020). Effects of blended learning pedagogical practices on students’ motivation and autonomy for the teaching of short stories in upper secondary English. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 512-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1542318
58. Yang, Y. T. C., Chuang, Y. C., Li, L. Y., & Tseng, S. S. (2013). A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers & Education, 63, 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.012
59. Yapici, K. (2019). Students’ and instructors’ perceptions on blended learning in an English preparatory program. Karabuk University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Karabuk, Turkiye. (Master’s dissertation). Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 559749.