Using Olfactory Displays as a Nontraditional Interface in Human Computer Interaction
Abstract
Smell has its limitations and disadvantages as a display medium, but it also has its strengths and many have recognized its potential. At present, in communications and virtual technologies, smell is either forgotten or improperly stimulated, because non controlled odorants present in the physical space surrounding the user. Nonetheless a controlled presentation of olfactory information can give advantages in various application fields. Therefore, two enabling technologies, electronic noses and especially olfactory displays are reviewed. Scenarios of usage are discussed together with relevant psycho-physiological issues. End-to-end systems including olfactory interfaces are quantitatively characterised under many respects. Recent works done by the authors on field are reported. The article will touch briefly on the control of scent emissions; an important factor to consider when building scented computer systems. As a sample application SUBSMELL system investigated. A look at areas of human computer interaction where olfaction output may prove useful will be presented. The article will finish with some brief conclusions and discuss some shortcomings and gaps of the topic. In particular, the addition of olfactory cues to a virtual environment increased the user's sense of presence and memory of the environment. Also, this article discusses the educational aspect of the subsmell systems.
Keywords
Olfactory Displays,Olfaction Output,Human Computer Interaction,User Interfaces,Smell
References
- Axel, R. (1995). Olfactive Logic Molecules, Scientific American, 25, 216-219.
- Barfield, W., Rosenberg, C., & Lotens, W. (1995). Augmented-Reality Displays. In W. Barfield & T. A. Furness III (Eds.) Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design (pp.542-575), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Bodnar, A., Corbett, R., & Nekrasovski, D. (2004). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal interfaces, ICMI '04, pp. 183-190, State College, PA, USA
- Brewster, S.A., McGookin, D.K. Miller, & Olfoto C.A. (2006). Designing a smell-based interaction. In Proceedings of ACM CHI (Montreal, Canada), ACM Press Addison-Wesley, pp 653-662.
- http://portal.acm.org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/citation.cfm?id=1124869&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=14158287&CFTOKEN=31454601
- Chen, Y. (2006). Olfactory display: development and application in virtual reality therapy. In Pan, Z., Cheok, D.A.D., Haller, M., Lau, R., Saito, H., Liang, R. (eds.) ICAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4282. Springer, Heidelberg
- Davide, F., Holmberg, M., & Lundström, I. (2001). Virtual olfactory interfaces: electronic noses and olfactory displays (pp. 193-220). In Communications Through Virtual Technology: Identity Community and Technology in the Internet Age (Eds. G. Riva and F. Davide), IOS Press: Amsterdam.
- Desor, J. A. (1974). The human capacity to transmit olfactory information. Perception and Psycophysics, 16, 551-556.
- ETSI (2002). European Telecommunications Standards Institute. Human Factors: Guidelines on the Multimodal of Icons, Symbols and Pictograms, pp.33-35, http://portal.etsi.org/docbox/EC_Files/EC_Files/eg_202048v010101p.pdf
- Gardner J.W., Bartlett P.N., Dodd G.H., & Shurmer H.V. (1990). The Design of an Artificial Olfactory System. In: Schild D. (eds) Chemosensory Information Processing. NATO ASI Series (Series H: Cell Biology), vol 39. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.