Engaging Students with Questions: Attitudes towards Using Student Response Systems in Higher Education
Abstract
The purpose of this review paper is to shed light on the impact of student response systems on students’ academic engagement in large lectures within the higher education level. 40 highly relevant studies obtained from a meticulous literature search by mainly using student response system and student academic engagement as keywords. Studies were reviewed based on publication year, context, main focus of the study, participants, and the results of the study. Review results show that research studies with student response system and student engagement has a decreasing trend in recent years, conducted mainly with the quantitative approach, predominantly conducted with the participants from the first year of college. Their results showed that student response systems in large lectures help students to increase their academic engagement with the course work, improve their academic achievement, motivation and satisfaction from the course. Additionally, use of student response systems increased student metacognitive awareness with the course content and encouraged in-class discussions among students. Further research studies are needed with student academic engagement focus and use of student response systems with national and international contexts.
Keywords
Student engagement,lecture,large classes,student response systems
References
- Asano, M., Mikawa, K., Nishina, K., Maekawa, N., & Obara, H. (1995). Improvement of the accuracy of references in the Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. Canadian journal of Anaesthesia, 42(5), pp. 370–372.
- Basak, S. K. (2016). Examining the inaccuracies of citations and referencing A Case of a Computer Science and Engineering Journal. 9th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 20 – 22 December 2016, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. 106–109.
- Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
- Evans, J. T., Nadjari, H. I., & Burchell, S. A. (1990). Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem. JAMA – The Journal of the American Medical Association, 263(10), pp. 1353–354.
- Gabriel, T. (2010). Plagiarism lines blur for students in digital age. The New York Times, 1(8).
- Gosling, C. M., Cameron, M., & Gibbons, P. F. (2004). Referencing and quotation accuracy in four manual therapy journals. Manual Therapy, 9(1), pp. 36–40.
- Harzing, A. W. (2002). Are our referencing errors undermining our scholarship and credibility? The case of expatriate failure rates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), pp. 127–148.
- Hensley, M. K. (2011). Citation management software: Features and futures. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(3), 204–208.
- Lane, A. (2009). The impact of openness on bridging educational digital divides. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5).
- Liang, L., Zhong, Z., & Rousseau, R. (2014). Scientists’ referencing (mis)behavior revealed by the dissemination network of referencing errors. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1973– 1986.