Virtual Dissection Table: A Supplemental Learning Aid for a Physical Therapy Anatomy Course

Abstract

While cadaver dissection and prosection are deemed quintessential methods for studying anatomy, these methods are attenuated by the flat, 2-D structures incorporated into didactic segments of the anatomy courses that minimize students’ ability to comprehend anatomy, leading to constraints in the teaching and learning experience. Several tools, such as 3-D virtual anatomy apps and anatomical models, enhance teaching and students’ understanding of gross human anatomy. The Anatomage, a virtual anatomy dissection table (VDT), is a compelling technological development with dissection capabilities and a prosection of the human body and its segments. This study intends to explore incorporating a VDT into a physical therapy anatomy course as an enhanced anatomical learning technique. The methods encompass the inclusion of the VDT as an extra dissection table within the cadaver lab setting. Each group of scholars was required to locate the anatomical configurations and dissections assigned to the topic on the VDT. The anatomy course included four examinations covering the entire human body. The results suggest advancements in knowledge retention following the incorporation of VDT in the cadaver dissection portion of the course. Therefore, we ascertained that the VDT is an exemplary tool to adopt in anatomy courses to aid in the comprehension of complex anatomical structures. Integrating VDT is paramount to the assimilation and application of human anatomy in students’ future health careers.

Keywords

• Virtual Dissection Table,
• Physical Therapy
• Anatomy Teaching
• Teaching and Learning Experience, Technology

References

1. Afsharpour, S., Gonsalves, A., Hosek, R., & Partin, E. (2018). Analysis of immediate student outcomes following a change in gross anatomy laboratory teaching methodology. The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 32(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-17-7.
2. Anatomage [Internet] (2019). [accessed 2021 February 15]. Available from: https://www.anatomage.com/ Bairamian, D., Liu, S., & Eftekhar, B. (2019) Virtual Reality Angiogram vs 3-Dimensional Printed Angiogram as an Educational tool-A Comparative Study. Neurosurgery, 85(2), 343-349.
3. Berkowitz, S. J., Kung, J. W., Eisenberg, R. L., Donohoe, K., Tsai, L. L., & Slanetz, P. J. (2014). Resident iPad use: has it really changed the game?. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 11(2), 180-184.
4. Bork, F., Stratmann, L., Enssle, S., Eck, U., Navab, N., Waschke, J., & Kugelmann, D. (2019). The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy. Anatomical Science Education, 12(6), 585-598.
5. Brucoli, M. Boffano, P., Pezzana, A., Sedran, L., Boccafoschi, F., & Benech, A. (2020). The potentialities of the Anatomage Table for head and neck pathology: medical education and informed consent. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 24(2), 229-234.
6. Brucoli, M., Boccafoschi, F., Boffano, P.; Broccardo, E., & Benech, A. (2018) The Anatomage Table and the placement of titanium mesh for the management of orbital floor fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 126(4), 317-321.
7. Chakraborty, T. R., & Cooperstein, D. F. (2018). Exploring anatomy and physiology using iPad applications. American Association of Anatomists, 11, 336-345. doi:10.1002/ase.1747
8. Custer T., & Michael K. (2015). The Utilization of the Anatomage Virtual Dissection Table in the Education of Imaging Science Students. Journal of Tomography & Simulation, 1, 102. doi:10.4172/jts.1000102.

9. Darras K.E., Spouge R., Hatala R., Nicolaou S., Hu J., Worthington A., Krebs C., & Forster B.B. (2019) Integrated virtual and cadaveric dissection laboratories enhance first year medical students' anatomy experience: a pilot study. BMC medical education, 19(1), 366. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1806-5.
10. Duncan-Vaidya E. A., & Stevenson E. L. (2020) The Effectiveness of an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in Learning Skull Anatomy at a Community College. Anatomical Science Education, doi: 10.1002/ase.1998.
11. Ghosh S. K. (2015). Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anatomy & Cell Biology, 48(3), 153-69.
12. Ha, J.E., & Choi, D.Y. (2019) Educational effect of 3D applications as a teaching aid for anatomical practice for dental hygiene students. Anatomy & cell biology, 52(4), 414-418.
13. Hammond, I., Taylor, J., & McMenamin, P. (2003). Anatomy of complications workshop: An educational strategy to improve performance in obstetricians and gynaecologists. Australian and New Zealand Journal of obstetrics and Gynaecology, 43(2), 111-114.
14. Houser, J.J., & Kondrashov, P. (2018). Gross Anatomy Education Today: The Integration of Traditional and Innovative Methodologies. Missouri Medicine, 115(1), 61-65.
15. Iwanaga J., Loukas M., Dumont A.S., & Tubbs R.S. (2020) A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation [published online ahead of print, Jul 18]. Clinical Anatomy, 34(1), 108-114.
16. Krause, B., Riley, M., & Taylor, M. (2015). Enhancing Clinical Gross Anatomy through Mobile Learning and Digital Media. The FASEB Journal, 29, 550-3.
17. Mathis, M.., Gonzalez-Sola, M., & Rosario, M. (2020). Anatomy Observational Outreach: A Multimodal Activity to Enhance Anatomical Education in Undergraduate Students. Journal of Student Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v9i1.869
18. Minhas P. S., Ghosh A, & Swanzy L. (2012). The effects of passive and active learning on student preference and performance in an undergraduate basic science course. Anatomical Science Education, 5(4), 200-7. doi: 10.1002/ase.1274.
19. Rosario, M. G., Gonzalez‐Sola, M., Hyder, A., Medley, A., & Weber M. (2019). Anatomage Virtual Dissection Table: a Supplemental Learning Aid for Human Anatomy Education during an Undergraduate Outreach Activity. First published: 01 April 2019 https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.604.9 Vol 33 Issue S1
20. Rosario, M. (2021). The Perceived Benefit of a 3D Anatomy Application (App) in Anatomy Occupational Therapy Courses. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 6 (1), 8-14. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/joltida/issue/59433/853789
21. Schofield K. A. (2018). Anatomy education in occupational therapy curricula: Perspectives of practitioners in the United States. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1723
22. Sugand, K., Abrahms, P., & Khurana, A. (2010). The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernizations. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3, 83-93. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ase.139
23. Smith, C.F., Martinez-Álvarez, C., & McHanwell, S. (2013). The context of learning anatomy: does it make a difference?. Journal of Anatomy, 224(3), 270-8.
24. Peterson D.C., & Mlynarczyk G.S. (2016) Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Anatomical Science Education, 9(6), 529-536. doi:10.1002/ase.1612.
25. Uruthiralingam, U., & Rea, P. M. (2020). Augmented and Virtual Reality in Anatomical Education–A Systematic Review. Biomedical Visualisation, 89-101.
26. Ward, T.M., Wertz, C.I., & Mickelsen, W. (2018). Anatomage Table Enhances Radiologic Technology Education. Radiologic technology, 89(3) 304-306.
27. Texas Woman’s University [Internet] (2021). Available from: https://twu.edu/ [accessed February 15, 2021].