Gender Perception on the Effectiveness of ULearn Management System as an eLearning Platform for Distance Education

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 35 - 45, 01.07.2020

Valentina Arkorful

Abstract

The growth in student numbers in this 21st century has led to a number of institutions focusing on distance education where appropriate technologies and pedagogical approaches are employed to deliver courses to students. The study adopted a quantitative approach and descriptive survey analysis to investigate the differences in gender perception and the effectiveness of ULearn (an learning Management System) at the University of Ghana. To measure the effectiveness and gender differences, a Test of Science Related Attitudes (TOSRA) consisting of 54 items organized into nine scales: Computer Usage (CU), Teacher Support (TS), Student Interaction and Collaboration (SIC), Personal Relevance (PR), Authentic Learning (AL), Student Autonomy (SA), Equity (EQ), Enjoyment (EN), and Asynchronicity (AS) was used. The study revealed that the level of effectiveness of the learning management system, from the perspective of the students was high. There were significant differences in gender perception on the effectiveness of the platform.

Keywords

distance learning, ULearn, e-learning, learning management systems, platform, gender, asynchronicity, perception

References

• Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students' perceptions of web based learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students' use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 222-226. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v10i3/10325.pdf
• Adegbija, M. V., & Bola, O. O. (2015). Perception of undergraduates on the adoption of mobile technologies for learning in selected universities in Kwara state, Nigeria. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 176, 352-356.
• Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.
• Asabere, N., Togo, G., Acakpovi, A., Torgby, W., & Ampadu, K. (2017). AIDS: An ICT model for integrating teaching, learning and research in Technical University Education in Ghana. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 13(3).
• Asuman, B., Khan, M. S. H., & Clement, C. K. (2018). Integration of Web-Based Learning into Higher Education Institutions in Uganda: Teachers' Perspectives. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 13(3), 33-50.
• Boateng, R., Mbrokoh, A. S., Boateng, L., Senyo, P. K.,& Ansong, E. (2016). Determinants of e-learning adoption among students of developing countries. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(4), 248-262.
• Bonney, J., Namburete, A. I., Dagadu, S., Quao, N. S., Osei- Ampofo, M., Awariyah, D., & Cobbold, S. (2019). Development of an E-Learning Platform For EMTs In Ghana. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 34(1), 119-120.
• Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.
• Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096-1112.
• Edumadze, J. K., Ogoe, J. I., Essilfie, G., Edumadze, G. E., & Graham, R. E. (2017). E-learning at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana-are our Distance Education Students Technologically Ready?. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 5(1), 47-55.
• Freeman, E., Antwi-Boampong, A., & Agyemang, O. B. K. (2019, November). Students’ Learning Experience Within a Blended Learning Environment in a Higher Education Institution in Ghana. In ECEL 2019 18th European Conference on e-Learning Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
• Gitau, M., & Omwenga, E. I. (2016). Application of the UTAUT Model to Understand Factors Influencing the use of Web 2.0 Tools in e-learning in Kenyan Public Universities. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 7(4).
• Gyamfi, S. A. (2017). Informal tools in formal context: Adoption of web 2.0 technologies among geography student teachers in Ghana. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 13(3).
• Jazeel, A. M., & Saravanakumar, A. R. (2016). Perception of Sri Lankan Teachers Towards Web Based Instruction in Learning Teaching Process at School Level. Science, 162(105.56), 7-58.
• Johnson, R. D. (2011). Gender differences in e-learning: Communication, social presence, and learning outcomes. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 23(1), 79-94. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2011010105
• Kavanoz, S., Yüksel, H. G., & Özcan, E. (2015). Pre-service teachers' self-efficacy perceptions on Web Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Computers & Education, 85, 94-101.
• Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & education, 104, 18-33.
• Kotoua, S., Ilkan, M., & Kilic, H. (2015). The growing of online education in Sub Saharan Africa: Case study Ghana. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19(1), 2406-2411.
• Maina, M. K., & Nzuki, D. M. (2015). Adoption determinants of e-learning management system in institutions of higher learning in Kenya: A Case of selected universities in Nairobi Metropolitan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(2).
• Olojo, O. J., Adewumi, M. G., & Ajisola, K. T. (2012). E- learning and its effects on teaching and learning in a global age. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 203-210. Retrieved from http://www.hrmars.com/admin/pics/484.pdf
• Owusu-Mensah, F., Anyan, J. A., & Denkyi, C. (2015). Staff Development Practices of Open and Distance Learning Institutions in Ghana: The Case of the Distance Education Programme of University of Education, Winneba, Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(14), 79-86.
• Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Rondán- Cataluña, F. J. (2015). Gender and acceptance of e-learning: a multi-group analysis based on a structural equation model among college students in Chile and Spain. PloS one, 10(10), e0140460.
• Sarfo, F. K., Amankwah, F., & Konin, D. (2017). Computer Self-Efficacy among Senior High School Teachers in Ghana and the Functionality of Demographic Variables on Their Computer Self-Efficacy. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(1), 19-31.
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. Handbook of motivation at school, 2, 34-54.
• Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (13-27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Shen, D., Cho, M.-H., Tsai, C.-L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001.
• Thomas, O. A., & Oladejo, M. A. (2017). Teacher-Trainees’ Perceptions of ICT (Information Communication Technology) Integration in Nigerian Teacher Education Programme. Educare, 10(1).
• Tsai, M.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Junior high school students' Internet usage and self-efficacy: A reexamination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182-1192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.004
• Yoo, S. J., Huang, W. H. D., & Kwon, S. (2015). Gender still matters: Employees’ acceptance levels towards e-learning in the workplaces of South Korea. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 7(2), 334-347.
• Zabadi, A. M., & Al-Alawi, A. H. (2016). University Students’ Attitudes towards E-Learning: University of Business & Technology (UBT)-Saudi Arabia-Jeddah: A Case Study. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 286-295.