Kalça artroskopı̇sı̇ ı̇le ı̇lgı̇lı̇ Türkçe lı̇teratür: bı̇blı̇yometrı̇k bı̇r yaklaşım

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kalça artroskopisi ile ilgili yayınlanmış makaleleri kullanarak Türkiye'deki araştırma verimliliğini ve eğilimlerini analiz etmektir. Yöntem Web of Science veri tabanının Science Citation Index Expanded ve Emerging Sources Citation Index'inde 1981'den 2023'e kadar indekslenen çalışmalar incelendi. Analizde makaleler yıllara, ülke, kurum, atıf sayısı ve yayınlandığı dergiye göre incelendi. Karşılaştırma için Scopus veri tabanı da analiz edildi. Sonuçlar: Araştırmaya göre Kasım 2023'e kadar WOS veri tabanında 35, Scopus veri tabanında ise 115 makale bulunmuştur. WOS veri tabanında (ESCI ve SCIE indekslerinde yayınlanan dergiler) Türkiye 64 ülke arasında 16. sırada yer alırken, Scopus veri tabanında Türkiye 13. sırada yer almaktadır. Sonuç Araştırmaya göre Kasım 2023 itibariyle WOS veri tabanında 35, Scopus veri tabanında ise 115 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. Diğer ülkelerle kıyaslandığında Türkiye'nin makale sayısının oldukça düşük olduğu görülmektedir. Bununla birlikte, yayın sayısındaki artış küresel eğilimle uyumludur.

Keywords

• Bibliyometrik analiz
• kalça artroskopisi
• yayın

Turkish literature on hip arthroscopy: a bibliometric approach

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to analyze research productivity and trends in Turkey using published articles on hip arthroscopy. Methods: Studies indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) of the Web of Science (WoS) database from 1981 to 2023 have been examined. The analysis included the number of articles by year, country, institution, citation count, and journal of publication. Additionally, the Scopus database was analyzed for comparison. Results: Research revealed 35 articles in the WoS database and 115 articles in the Scopus database as of November 2023. In the WoS database (journals published in the ESCI and SCIE indexes), Turkey ranked 16th out of 64 countries, while in the Scopus database, Turkey ranked 13th. Conclusion: Compared to other countries, Turkey has a significantly low number of articles. However, the increase in publications aligns with the global trend.

Keywords

• Bibliometric analysis
• hip arthroscopy
• publications

References

1. Burman MS. Arthroscopy or the direct visualization of joints: an experimental cadaver study. 1931. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;390:5-9. doi:10.1097/00003086-200109000-00003
2. Tatsr JJ. The arthroscope: the second report. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1939;14:441-466.
3. Lubowitz JH, Poehling GG. Hip arthroscopy: an emerging gold standard. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Related Surg. 2006;22(12):1257-1259. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.10.002
4. Jamil M, Dandachli W, Noordin S, Witt J. Hip arthroscopy: indications, outcomes and complications. Int J Surg. 2018;54:341-344. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.557
5. Degen RM, Pasic N, Baha P, Getgood A, Burkhart TA. Biomechanical evaluation of a hybrid suture and anchor-based hip capsular repair. Clin Biomech. 2021;81:105246. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105246
6. Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog RF. Sports and recreation activity of patients with femoroacetabular impingement before and after arthroscopic osteoplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):917-922. doi:10.1177/0363546508330144
7. Su CA, Trivedi NN, Salata MJ, Voos JE. Advances in Hip Arthroscopy. Techniques Orthop. 2021;36(3):210-215. doi:10.1097/BTO.0000000000000495
8. Volpin A, Maiden C, Biz C, Hossain F, Zagra L, Konan S. Hip arthroscopy current advances. Acta Orthop Belg. 2020;86(e-Suppl 3):158-164.

9. Kandil A, Safran MR. Hip arthroscopy: a brief history. Clin Sports Med. 2016;35(3):321-329. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2016.02.001
10. Rühmann O, Puljić P, Schierbaum B, Wünsch M, Lerch S. Hip arthroscopy technique. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2021;33(1):55-76. doi:10.1007/s00064-020-00697-1
11. Üzümcügil A, Kurt M, Yılmaz S. Bibliometric approach to total hip arthroplasty literature originating from Turkey. J Contemp Med. 2023;13(4):711-719. doi:10.16899/jcm.1312501
12. Uyar C, Alkan S, Tahmaz A. Research trends and hotspots of osteoarticular involvement in brucellosis. J Zoonotic Dis. 2022;6(2):69-77. doi:10.22034/jzd.2022.14656
13. Seetharam A, Ali MT, Wang CY, et al. Authorship trends in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research: a bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(11):3071-3080. doi:10.1002/jor.24054
14. Lazarides MK, Lazaridou IZ, Papanas N. Bibliometric analysis: bridging informatics with science. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023. doi:10.1177/15347346231153538
15. Li Y, Wang W, Chao D, Chai J, Kong L, Zhang H. Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis: a bibliometric study. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(12):125752588. doi:10.21037/apm-21-3548
16. Tang F, Dai WB, Li XL, Turghun D, Huang H, Fan YQ. Publication Trends and hot spots in femoroacetabular impingement research: a 20-year bibliometric analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(8):2698-2707. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.019
17. Kambhampati SBS, Vaish A, Vaishya R, Patralekh MK. Trends of arthroscopy publications in PubMed and Scopus. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021;33(1):14. doi:10.1186/s43019-021-00096-1
18. Barbera J, Selverian S, Courington R, Mikhail C, Colvin A. The top 50 most influential articles in hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg. 2020;36(3):716-722. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.031
19. Wolf MA, Millenaar D, Winter P, Mahfoud F, Landgraeber S. Comprehensive analysis of scientific output in hip and knee arthroscopy. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023;90(4):233-238. doi:10.55095/achot2023/028
20. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
21. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):1053-1070. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7