Research Article

The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters

Volume: 2 Number: 3 September 1, 2018
TR EN

The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluated the effects of applying CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during mask ventilation upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. 

Methods: This prospective randomized study included 100 patients allocated to 4 groups. In Groups I and III, preoxygenation was applied with CPAP mask without any pressure and during induction ventilation was performed with volume-controlled ventilation (CMV) in Group I and CMV + 6 cm H2O PEEP in Group III. In Groups II and IV, preoxygenation was applied with CPAP mask with 6 cmH2O pressure and during induction; ventilation was performed with CMV in Group II and CMV + 6 cm H2O PEEP in Group IV. After tracheal intubation, the tube was left open to air and the patient remained apneic until SpO2 reached 90%. 

Results: The time for SpO2 to reach 90% is significantly longer in Group IV compared to the other groups. The durations were 412.50±97.37 sec in Group I, 443.52±88.84 sec in Group II, 415.20±117.45 sec in Group III and 522.92±83.44 sec in Group IV. Using only CPAP during preoxygenation and only PEEP during mask ventilation had no significant effect on duration of non-hypoxic apnea. 

Conclusion: Especially for patients with difficult intubation, application of CPAP during preoxygenation followed with PEEP during mask ventilation safe, simple and it prolongs non-hypoxic apnea period.


Keywords

References

  1. 1. Lumb AB. Oxygen. Nunn’s Applied Respiratory Physiology Oxford: Butterworth-Heinmann 2000;288-290.
  2. 2. Edmark L, Enlund M, Kostova-Aherdan K, Hedenstierna G. Atelectasis formation and apnoea tolerance after pre-oxygenation with 100%, 80%, or 60% oxygen. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:A1330.
  3. 3. Lundquist H, Hedenstierna G, Strandberg A, Tokics L, Brismar B. CT-assessment of dependent lung densities in man during general anaesthesia. Acta Radiologica. 1995;36:626–32.
  4. 4. Magnusson L, Spahn DR. New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003;91:61–72.
  5. 5. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Reber A, Hedenstierna G. Prevention of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Lancet. 1995;345:1387–91.
  6. 6. Joyce CJ, Wıllıams AB. Kinetics of absorption atelectasis during anesthesia: a mathematical model. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:1116-25.
  7. 7. Rusca M, Wicky S, Proietti S. Continuous positive airways pressure prevents atelectasis formation during induction of general anaesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:AI33I.
  8. 8. Rusca M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Hedenstierna G, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during induction of general anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2003;97:1835–9.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Selçuk Tur This is me
Türkiye

Hülya Başar This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 1, 2018

Submission Date

June 24, 2018

Acceptance Date

July 6, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 3

APA
Uyar Türkyılmaz, H. E., Göktuğ, A., Tur, S., & Başar, H. (2018). The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 2(3), 310-314. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.436032
AMA
1.Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Göktuğ A, Tur S, Başar H. The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. J Surg Med. 2018;2(3):310-314. doi:10.28982/josam.436032
Chicago
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra, Asutay Göktuğ, Selçuk Tur, and Hülya Başar. 2018. “The Effect of CPAP During Preoxygenation and PEEP During Induction Upon the Duration of Non-Hypoxic Apnea and Hemodynamic Parameters”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2 (3): 310-14. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.436032.
EndNote
Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Göktuğ A, Tur S, Başar H (September 1, 2018) The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2 3 310–314.
IEEE
[1]H. E. Uyar Türkyılmaz, A. Göktuğ, S. Tur, and H. Başar, “The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters”, J Surg Med, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 310–314, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.28982/josam.436032.
ISNAD
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra - Göktuğ, Asutay - Tur, Selçuk - Başar, Hülya. “The Effect of CPAP During Preoxygenation and PEEP During Induction Upon the Duration of Non-Hypoxic Apnea and Hemodynamic Parameters”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2/3 (September 1, 2018): 310-314. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.436032.
JAMA
1.Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Göktuğ A, Tur S, Başar H. The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. J Surg Med. 2018;2:310–314.
MLA
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra, et al. “The Effect of CPAP During Preoxygenation and PEEP During Induction Upon the Duration of Non-Hypoxic Apnea and Hemodynamic Parameters”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 2, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 310-4, doi:10.28982/josam.436032.
Vancouver
1.Havva Esra Uyar Türkyılmaz, Asutay Göktuğ, Selçuk Tur, Hülya Başar. The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. J Surg Med. 2018 Sep. 1;2(3):310-4. doi:10.28982/josam.436032