Araştırma Makalesi

The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3 1 Eylül 2018
PDF İndir
TR EN

The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters

Öz

Aim: This study evaluated the effects of applying CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during mask ventilation upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. 

Methods: This prospective randomized study included 100 patients allocated to 4 groups. In Groups I and III, preoxygenation was applied with CPAP mask without any pressure and during induction ventilation was performed with volume-controlled ventilation (CMV) in Group I and CMV + 6 cm H2O PEEP in Group III. In Groups II and IV, preoxygenation was applied with CPAP mask with 6 cmH2O pressure and during induction; ventilation was performed with CMV in Group II and CMV + 6 cm H2O PEEP in Group IV. After tracheal intubation, the tube was left open to air and the patient remained apneic until SpO2 reached 90%. 

Results: The time for SpO2 to reach 90% is significantly longer in Group IV compared to the other groups. The durations were 412.50±97.37 sec in Group I, 443.52±88.84 sec in Group II, 415.20±117.45 sec in Group III and 522.92±83.44 sec in Group IV. Using only CPAP during preoxygenation and only PEEP during mask ventilation had no significant effect on duration of non-hypoxic apnea. 

Conclusion: Especially for patients with difficult intubation, application of CPAP during preoxygenation followed with PEEP during mask ventilation safe, simple and it prolongs non-hypoxic apnea period.


Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Lumb AB. Oxygen. Nunn’s Applied Respiratory Physiology Oxford: Butterworth-Heinmann 2000;288-290.
  2. 2. Edmark L, Enlund M, Kostova-Aherdan K, Hedenstierna G. Atelectasis formation and apnoea tolerance after pre-oxygenation with 100%, 80%, or 60% oxygen. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:A1330.
  3. 3. Lundquist H, Hedenstierna G, Strandberg A, Tokics L, Brismar B. CT-assessment of dependent lung densities in man during general anaesthesia. Acta Radiologica. 1995;36:626–32.
  4. 4. Magnusson L, Spahn DR. New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003;91:61–72.
  5. 5. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Reber A, Hedenstierna G. Prevention of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Lancet. 1995;345:1387–91.
  6. 6. Joyce CJ, Wıllıams AB. Kinetics of absorption atelectasis during anesthesia: a mathematical model. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:1116-25.
  7. 7. Rusca M, Wicky S, Proietti S. Continuous positive airways pressure prevents atelectasis formation during induction of general anaesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:AI33I.
  8. 8. Rusca M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Hedenstierna G, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during induction of general anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2003;97:1835–9.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Cerrahi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Selçuk Tur Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Hülya Başar Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Eylül 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

24 Haziran 2018

Kabul Tarihi

6 Temmuz 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Uyar Türkyılmaz, H. E., Göktuğ, A., Tur, S., & Başar, H. (2018). The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 2(3), 310-314. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.436032
AMA
1.Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Göktuğ A, Tur S, Başar H. The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. J Surg Med. 2018;2(3):310-314. doi:10.28982/josam.436032
Chicago
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra, Asutay Göktuğ, Selçuk Tur, ve Hülya Başar. 2018. “The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2 (3): 310-14. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.436032.
EndNote
Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Göktuğ A, Tur S, Başar H (01 Eylül 2018) The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2 3 310–314.
IEEE
[1]H. E. Uyar Türkyılmaz, A. Göktuğ, S. Tur, ve H. Başar, “The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters”, J Surg Med, c. 2, sy 3, ss. 310–314, Eyl. 2018, doi: 10.28982/josam.436032.
ISNAD
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra - Göktuğ, Asutay - Tur, Selçuk - Başar, Hülya. “The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2/3 (01 Eylül 2018): 310-314. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.436032.
JAMA
1.Uyar Türkyılmaz HE, Göktuğ A, Tur S, Başar H. The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. J Surg Med. 2018;2:310–314.
MLA
Uyar Türkyılmaz, Havva Esra, vd. “The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, c. 2, sy 3, Eylül 2018, ss. 310-4, doi:10.28982/josam.436032.
Vancouver
1.Havva Esra Uyar Türkyılmaz, Asutay Göktuğ, Selçuk Tur, Hülya Başar. The effect of CPAP during preoxygenation and PEEP during induction upon the duration of non-hypoxic apnea and hemodynamic parameters. J Surg Med. 01 Eylül 2018;2(3):310-4. doi:10.28982/josam.436032