Research Article

Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies

Volume: 5 Number: 2 February 1, 2021
EN

Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies

Abstract

Background/Aim: Various cannulation techniques are used for different aortic pathologies during aortic surgery. High aortic arch cannulation is an easy technique which does not require a second incision. The aim of this study is to compare high aortic arch cannulation with other arterial cannulation techniques and assess its safety and risks profile. Methods: This retrospective study included sixty consecutive patients (23 female and 37 male) who underwent elective surgery for ascending aortic aneurysm between July 2011 and June 2014. Patients were divided into Group 1 (aortic arch cannulation) and Group 2 (femoral artery, axillary artery, innominate artery cannulations) according to the location of arterial cannulation. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data of patients with or without arch cannulation were compared. Results: Ascending aorta was replaced with a graft in all patients. High aortic arch cannulation was performed in thirty-eight patients (63.3%) while the cannulation site was axillary artery in 9 (15%), femoral artery in 8 (13.3%) and innominate artery in 5 (8.3%) patients. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative demographic factors, concomitant cardiac pathologies, additional surgical procedures, and intraoperative parameters (P>0.05). Moreover, there was no difference between postoperative complications with the one exception of complications related to the cannulation site which was significantly more frequent in cannulation techniques other than arch cannulation (P=0.04). We observed no complications related to the cannulation site in patients with arch cannulation. Conclusion: Our study showed that high aortic arch cannulation in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms is an easy, fast, and safe technique with low complication rates. It can be the technique of first choice for those with ascending aortic aneurysms limited to ascending aorta with no place for cannulation, cross clamp and anastomosis but still can be repaired with single cross-clamping without total circulatory arrest.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. McAlpine WA, Selman MW, Kawakami T. Routine use of aortic cannulation in open heart operations. Am J Surg. 1967;114:831–4.
  2. 2. Davidson KG. Cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Taylor KM ed. Cardiopulmonary bypass: principles and management . Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins, 1987.pp.55–89.
  3. 3. Salerno TA, Lince DP, White DN, Lynn R, Charrette EJP. Arch versus femoral artery perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978;78:681–4.
  4. 4. Merin O, Silberman S, Brauner R, Munk Y, Shapira N, Falkowski G, et al. Femoro-femoral bypass for repeat open-heart surgery. Perfusion 1998;13:455–9.
  5. 5. Hendrickson SC, Glower DD. A method for perfusion of the leg during cardiopulmonary bypass via femoral cannulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1807–8.
  6. 6. Greason KL, Hemp JR, Maxwell JM, Fetter JE, Moreno-Cabral RJ. Prevention of distal leg ischemia during cardiopulmonary support via femoral cannulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:209–10.
  7. 7. Bigutay AM, Garamella JJ, Danyluk M, Remucal HC. Retrograde aortic dissection occurring during cardiopulmonary bypass. JAMA. 1976;236:465–8.
  8. 8. Jones TW, Vetto RR, Winterscheid LC, Dıllard DH, Merendıno KA. Arterial complications incident to cannulation in open-heart surgery. Ann Surg. 1960;152:969–74.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Cardiovascular Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

February 1, 2021

Submission Date

June 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

February 24, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Yücel, C., Kayalar, N., Ketenciler, S., & Erentuğ, V. (2021). Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 5(2), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.757190
AMA
1.Yücel C, Kayalar N, Ketenciler S, Erentuğ V. Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies. J Surg Med. 2021;5(2):135-139. doi:10.28982/josam.757190
Chicago
Yücel, Cihan, Nihan Kayalar, Serkan Ketenciler, and Vedat Erentuğ. 2021. “Comparison of High Aortic Arch and Other Arterial Cannulation Types in Ascending Aortic Pathologies”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 (2): 135-39. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.757190.
EndNote
Yücel C, Kayalar N, Ketenciler S, Erentuğ V (February 1, 2021) Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 2 135–139.
IEEE
[1]C. Yücel, N. Kayalar, S. Ketenciler, and V. Erentuğ, “Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies”, J Surg Med, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 135–139, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.28982/josam.757190.
ISNAD
Yücel, Cihan - Kayalar, Nihan - Ketenciler, Serkan - Erentuğ, Vedat. “Comparison of High Aortic Arch and Other Arterial Cannulation Types in Ascending Aortic Pathologies”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5/2 (February 1, 2021): 135-139. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.757190.
JAMA
1.Yücel C, Kayalar N, Ketenciler S, Erentuğ V. Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies. J Surg Med. 2021;5:135–139.
MLA
Yücel, Cihan, et al. “Comparison of High Aortic Arch and Other Arterial Cannulation Types in Ascending Aortic Pathologies”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, Feb. 2021, pp. 135-9, doi:10.28982/josam.757190.
Vancouver
1.Cihan Yücel, Nihan Kayalar, Serkan Ketenciler, Vedat Erentuğ. Comparison of high aortic arch and other arterial cannulation types in ascending aortic pathologies. J Surg Med. 2021 Feb. 1;5(2):135-9. doi:10.28982/josam.757190