Research Article

Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion

Volume: 4 Number: 11 November 1, 2020
EN TR

Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion

Abstract

Aim: Postoperative sore throat after general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway is a common and undesirable complication. There are many agents and methods to prevent this complication. However, there is no study comparing intravenous lidocaine and lidocaine-paracetamol combination in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of systemic lidocaine and systemic lidocaine-paracetamol combination on postoperative sore throat in patients who underwent general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway. Methods: A total of 80 patients aged over 18 years with ASA I-III who underwent elective inguinal hernia surgery under general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway were included in this cross-sectional study. Group LidoPara was administered 1 mg kg-1 lidocaine + 10 mg kg-1 paracetamol, and Group Lido, 1 mg kg-1 lidocaine. Resting and swallowing sore throat and hoarseness were evaluated with a 4-point scale at the postoperative 0th, 2nd, 4th, and 24th hours. Results: Demographic data of the patients were similar (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of resting and swallowing sore throat at the postoperative 0th, 2nd, 4th, and 24th hours. No hoarseness was found in both groups at the postoperative 4th and 24th hours. Conclusion: Combined paracetamol and lidocaine was found to affect postoperative resting and swallowing sore throat similar to lidocaine alone.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. El-Boghdadly K, Bailey CR, Wiles MD. Postoperative sore throat: A systematic review. Anesthesia. 2016;71:706-17.
  2. 2. Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE. Supraglottic Airway devices. In: Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE, editors. Understanding Anaesthesia Equipment. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2008:461-519.
  3. 3. Jaensson M, Gupta A, Nilsson UG. Risk factors for development of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness after endotracheal intubation in women: A secondary analysis. AANA Journal. 2012;80:67-73.
  4. 4. Jaensson M, Olowsson LL, Nilsson U. Endotracheal tube size and sore throat following surgery: a randomized-controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:147-53.
  5. 5. Tanaka Y, Nakayama T, Nishimori M, Tsujimura Y, Kawaguchi M, Sato Y. Lidocaine for preventing postoperative sore throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:Cd004081.
  6. 6. Duggan ST, Scott LJ. Intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen). Drugs. 2009;69: 101–13.
  7. 7. Jebaraj B, Maitra S, Baidya DK, Khanna P. Intravenous paracetamol reduces postoperative opioid consumption after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of clinical trials. Pain Res Treat. 2013:402510.
  8. 8. Olonisakin RP, Amanor-Boadu SD, Akinyemi AO. Morphine sparing effect of intravenous paracetamol for post operative pain management following gynaecological surgery. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2012;41:429–36.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Anaesthesiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

November 1, 2020

Submission Date

September 27, 2020

Acceptance Date

December 10, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 4 Number: 11

APA
Arıcan, Ş., Yılmaz, R., Hacıbeyoğlu, G., Bilge, A., Yaman, R., Topal, A., & Tuncer, S. (2020). Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 4(11), 1023-1026. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.800727
AMA
1.Arıcan Ş, Yılmaz R, Hacıbeyoğlu G, et al. Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion. J Surg Med. 2020;4(11):1023-1026. doi:10.28982/josam.800727
Chicago
Arıcan, Şule, Resul Yılmaz, Gülçin Hacıbeyoğlu, et al. 2020. “Comparison of Intravenous Lidocaine and Intravenous Lidocaine Paracetamol in Prevention of Postoperative Sore Throat After Laryngeal Mask Insertion”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 (11): 1023-26. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.800727.
EndNote
Arıcan Ş, Yılmaz R, Hacıbeyoğlu G, Bilge A, Yaman R, Topal A, Tuncer S (November 1, 2020) Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 11 1023–1026.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Arıcan et al., “Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion”, J Surg Med, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1023–1026, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.28982/josam.800727.
ISNAD
Arıcan, Şule - Yılmaz, Resul - Hacıbeyoğlu, Gülçin - Bilge, Ayşegül - Yaman, Rabia - Topal, Ahmet - Tuncer, Sema. “Comparison of Intravenous Lidocaine and Intravenous Lidocaine Paracetamol in Prevention of Postoperative Sore Throat After Laryngeal Mask Insertion”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4/11 (November 1, 2020): 1023-1026. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.800727.
JAMA
1.Arıcan Ş, Yılmaz R, Hacıbeyoğlu G, Bilge A, Yaman R, Topal A, Tuncer S. Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion. J Surg Med. 2020;4:1023–1026.
MLA
Arıcan, Şule, et al. “Comparison of Intravenous Lidocaine and Intravenous Lidocaine Paracetamol in Prevention of Postoperative Sore Throat After Laryngeal Mask Insertion”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 4, no. 11, Nov. 2020, pp. 1023-6, doi:10.28982/josam.800727.
Vancouver
1.Şule Arıcan, Resul Yılmaz, Gülçin Hacıbeyoğlu, Ayşegül Bilge, Rabia Yaman, Ahmet Topal, Sema Tuncer. Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine/paracetamol in prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask insertion. J Surg Med. 2020 Nov. 1;4(11):1023-6. doi:10.28982/josam.800727