Siyasal İletişim Tekniği Olarak Canvassing ve Seçmen Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkileri

Year 2007, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 144 - 155, 19.11.2013

Ahmet Kalender

Abstract

Siyasal partilerin en temel amacı seçimleri kazanmak ve iktidar olmaktır. Bu amaca ulaşmak için siyasal partiler, çeşitli iletişim araç ve tekniklerini kullanırlar. Son dönemlerde önem kazanan ve uygulaması giderek artan siyasal iletişim tekniklerinden birisi de canvassingtir.  Canvassingin seçmen davranışı üzerindeki etkisiyle ilgili araştırmalar 1970'li yıllarda başlamış, 2000 yılından sonra da yoğunluk kazanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, canvassingle ilgili araştırmalar gözönünde tutularak, seçmenler üzerindeki ikna ve harekete geçirme etkileri tartışılmakta, canvassing uygulama biçimleri ile etkileri incelenmekte ve başarılı canvassing için nelere dikkat edilmesi gerektiği belirlenmeye çalışılmaktadır.

 

Keywords

canvassing; seçmen davranışı; canvassing çeşitleri; canvassing etkisi

References

• Adams W C ve Smith D J (1980) Effects of Telephone Canvassing on Turnout and Preferences: A Field Experiment, Public Opinion Quarterly, 44 (3), 389-395.
• Aziz A (2003) Siyasal İletişim, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
• Bennion E A (2005) Caught in the Ground Wars: Mobilizing Voters During a Competitive Congressional Campaign, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 123-141.
• Bergan D E, Gerber A S, Green D P ve Panagopoulos C (2005) Grassroots Mobilization and Voter Turnout in 2004, Public Opinion Quarterly, 65 (5), 760-777.
• Blaemire R ve Russel B (2004) Developing a Web-Based Voter File System, Campaign and Elections, 25 (5), 38.
• Cardy E A (2005) An Experimental Field Study of the GOTV and Persuasion Effects of Partisan Direct Mail and Phone Calls” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 28-40.
• Denver D ve Hands G (2000) The Fall and Rise of Constituency Campaigning, J Bartle (ed), Political Communication Transformed: From Marrison to Mandelson, Gordonsville, V.A., Palgrave Macmillan, USA, pp 71-86.
• Devran Y (2003) Siyasal Kampanya Yönetimi, And Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Galatas S E (2004) Electing the First Parliament: Party Competition and Voter Participation in Scotland, Party Politics, 10 (2), 213-233.
• Gerber A S ve Green D P (2000) The Effect of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment”, American Political Science Review, 94 (3), 653-663.
• Gerber A S ve Green D P (2001) Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? A Field Experiment, Public Opinion Quarterly, 65 (1), 75-85.
• Gerber A S ve Green D P (2005) Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? An Update, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 142-154.
• Gershtenson J (2003) Mobilization Strategies of the Democrats and Republicans, 1956-2000, Political Research Quarterly, 56 (3), 293-308.
• Green D P ve Gerber A S (2004) Get Out The Vote: How To Increase Voter Turnout, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
• Green D P, Gerber A S ve Nickerson D W (2003) Getting Out The Vote in Local Elections: Results From Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments, The Journal of Politics, 65 (4), 1083-1096.
• Hall R B (1995) Door-to-door canvassing and Personal Contact in Library Referenda Campaigns, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 8 (4), 21-25.
• Harrop M ve Miller W L (1987) Election and Voters A Comparative Introduction, McMillan, London.
• Herzberg D G ve Peltason J W (1970) A Student Guide To Campaign Politics, Mcgraw Hill, New York.
• Kalender A (2005) Siyasal İletişim Seçmenler ve İkna Stratejileri, Çizgi Kitabevi, Konya.
• Kramer G H (1970) The Effect of PrecinctLevel Canvassing on Voter Behavior”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 34 (4), 560-572.
• Krassa M A (1989) Getting Out the Black Vote: The Party Canvass and the Black Response, L J Barker (ed), New Perspectives in American Politics, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, pp. 58-75.
• Lariscy R W, Tinkham S F, Edwards H H ve Jones K O (2004) The “Ground War” of Political Campaigns: Nonpaid Activities in U.S. State Legislative Races, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81 (3), 477-497.
• Ma N ve Choy C-K (2003) The Impact of Electoral Rule Change on Party Campaign Strategy Hong Kong as as Case Study, Party Politics, 9(3), 347-367.
• Maksudoğlu F (2006) Kitle İletişim Araçlarının Seçim Propagandalarında Kullanımı: Antakya Örneği, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi SBE, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hatay, http:// kutuphane.mku.edu.tr/tez/T301.pdf.13.04.2007
• Marland A J (1998) Constituency Campaigning: A Review of The Literature and a Case Study of Ottowa Centre, 1997, UMI dissertation.
• Mc Allister I (1985) Campaign Activities and Electoral Outcomes in Britain 1979 and 1983, Public Opinion Quarterly, 49 (4), 489-503.
• McNulty J E (2005) Phone-Based GOTVWhat’s on the Line? Field Experiments with Varied Partisan Components, 2002-2003, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 41-65.
• Michelson M R (2003) Getting Out The Latino Vote: How Door-to-Door Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California, Political Behavior, 25 (3) 247-263.
• Michelson M R (2005) Meeting the Challenge of Latino Voter Mobilization, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 85-101.
• Nickerson D W (2005) Partisan Mobilization Using Volunteer Phone Banks and Door Hangers, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 10-27.
• Nickerson D W (2006) Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout: Evidence From Eight Field Experiments, American Politics Research, 34 (3), 271-292.
• Oktay M (2002) Politikada Halkla İlişkiler, Derin Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Özbudun E (2006) From Political Islam to Conservative Democracy: The Case of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey, South European Society&Politics 11 (3-4),543-557.
• Özerkan Altınal Ş ve İnceoğlu Y (1997) İletişimde Etkileme Süreci Seçim Kampanyalarından Örneklerle, Pan Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Peck L M (1996) Going door-to-door: 10 tips for Success, Campaigns and Elections, 17 (7),45-46.
• Ramirez R (2005) Giving Voice to Latino Voters: A Field Experiment on the Effectiveness of a National Nonpartisan Mobilization Effort, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 66-84.
• Shea D M (1998) Get-Out-The-Vote: 5-Step Process, Campaigns and Elections, 19 (10), 48.
• Sheinkopf K G, Atkin C K ve Bowen L (1972) The Functions of Political Advertising for Campaign Organizations, Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (4), 401-405.
• Topuz H (1991) Siyasal Reklamcılık Dünyadan ve Türkiye’den Örneklerle, Cem Yayınevi, İstanbul.
• Trent J S ve Friedenberg R V (2000) Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices, Praeger Publishers, USA.
• Turan, A E (2004) Türkiye’de Seçmen Davranışı Önceki Kırılmalar ve 2002 Seçimi, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Uztuğ F (1999) Siyasal Marka Seçim Kampanyaları ve Aday İmajı, MediaCat Yayınları, Ankara.
• Whiteley P ve Seyd P (2003) Party Election Campaigning in Britain The Labour Party, Party Politics, 9 (5), 637-652.
• Wielhouwer P W (1999) The Mobilization of Campaign Activists by the Party Canvass, American Politics Quarterly, 27 (2), 177-200.
• Wielhouwer P W (2003) In Search of Lincoln’s Perfect List Targeting in Grassroots Campaigns, American Politics Research, 31 (6),632-669.