Investigation of the Cognitive Structures of Gifted Secondary School Students: A Study of Geography Concept

Abstract

Assessing students’ comprehension of geography through a word association test is crucial for understanding their cognitive frameworks. This insight is fundamental in facilitating students’ cognitive development. This study aimed to investigate how gifted secondary school students conceptualise geography utilising a word association test. The research was designed as a quantitative research method using a survey model, and content analysis was used in the analysis of the data. Data collected from 100 gifted secondary school students were categorised into nine oes: geomorphology, political geography, educational resources, cartography, hydrogeography, biogeography, cultural geography, soil-agricultural geography, and climatology. The results of this investigation can inform educational strategies that optimise the learning potential of gifted students and align with their cognitive constructs of geography.

Keywords

• Conception
• gifted student
• geography
• word association test
• cognitive structure
• secondary school

Investigation of the Cognitive Structures of Gifted Secondary School Students: A Study of Geography Concept

Abstract

Öğrencilerin coğrafyayı anlamalarını bir kelime ilişkilendirme testi aracılığıyla değerlendirmek, bilişsel çerçevelerini anlamak için çok önemlidir. Bu kavrayış, öğrencilerin bilişsel gelişimini kolaylaştırmada temeldir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üstün yetenekli ortaokul öğrencilerinin coğrafyayı nasıl kavramsallaştırdıklarını bir kelime ilişkilendirme testi kullanarak araştırmaktır. Üstün yetenekli 100 ortaokul öğrencisinden toplanan veriler dokuz temaya ayrılmıştır: jeomorfoloji, siyasi coğrafya, eğitim kaynakları, kartografya, hidrojeografi, biyocoğrafya, kültürel coğrafya, toprak-tarım coğrafyası ve klimatoloji. Bu araştırmanın sonuçları, üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin öğrenme potansiyelini optimize eden ve coğrafyanın bilişsel yapılarıyla uyumlu olan eğitim stratejilerini bilgilendirebilir.

Keywords

• Kavram
• üstün yetenekli öğrenci
• coğrafya
• kelime ilişkilendirme testi
• bilişsel yapı
• ortaokul

References

1. Androulidakis, Y., Makris, C., Kombiadou, K., Krestenitis, Y., Stefanidou, N., Antoniadou, C., Krasakopoulou, E., Kalatzi, M.-I., Baltikas, V., Moustaka-Gouni, M., & Chintiroglou, C. C. (2024). Oceanographic research in the Thermaikos Gulf: A review over five decades. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(5), 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12050795
2. Bahar, M., & Özatlı, N., S. (2003). Kelime iletişim test yöntemi ile lise 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin canlıların temel bileşenleri konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının araştırılması. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 75-85.
3. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Sutcliffe, F. G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 134-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655653
4. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655653
5. Balci, F., Elif Baykal, G., Göksun, T., Kisbu, Y., & Evren Yantaç, A. (2023). My creative World (MCW): Improving creative thinking in elementary school-aged children. Creativity Research Journal, 36(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2234703
6. Bozdağ, F. Ü. (2025). Cognitive patterns in learner texts: Exploring semantic and semiotic dimensions through topic modeling. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-8146-5.ch011
7. Cherukunnath, D., & Singh, A. P. (2022). Exploring cognitive processes of knowledge acquisition to upgrade academic practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 682628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.682628.
8. Constantinescu, Ș. (2024). The cartographic styles of Danube Delta. GeoJournal, 89, 234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11232-1

9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (Fifth Edition). Los Angeles, SAGE.
10. Desvaux, T., Danna, J., Velay, J. L., & Frey, A. (2023). From gifted to high potential and twice exceptional: A state-of-the-art meta-review. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 13(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2023.2252950
11. Falcinelli, I., Fini, C., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2024). The geo domain: a review on the conceptulaization of geographical and geopolitical enttities. Front. Psychol. 15, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1389581
12. Hann, D. G., & Hagelman, R. R. (2021). Geographic and environmental themes in children’s literature. Journal of Geography, 120(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.1915363
13. Jo, I., & Hong-Dwyer, J. J. (2023). GIS learning and college students’ acquisition and understanding of spatial concepts. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 48(5), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2023.2263748
14. Kerski, J. J. (2015). Geo-awareness, geo-enablement, geotechnologies, citizen science, and storytelling: Geography on the world stage. Geography Compass, 9(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12193
15. Kocabaşoğlu, B., & Şahin, E. (2021). Investigation of gifted students’ cognitive structures on the concept of innovation. Journal Of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 649-673. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-9463
16. Korvasova, V. (2021). The students’ image of geography: A systematic review. Geografie, 126, 4,347–370. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2021126040347
17. Kostova, Z., & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word association test for studying conceptual structures of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 2(2), 209-231.
18. Lee, C. D. (2016). Examining conception of how people learn over the decades through AERA presidental addresses: Diversity and equity as persistent conundrums. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 73-82. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X16639045
19. Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
20. Lin, S., Wang, X., & Nan, C. (2024). Slope unit-based genetic landform mapping on Tibetan plateau- a terrain unit-based framework for large spatial scale landform classification. CATENA, 236, 107757, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107757.
21. Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., & Liu, Z. (2024). Academic stress detection based on multisource data: a systematic review from 2012 to 2024. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2387744
22. McLoughlin, E., Arnold, R., Moore, L. J., Slavich, G. M., & Fletcher, D. (2024). A qualitative exploration of how lifetime stressor exposure influences sport performers’ health, wellbeing, and performance. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 37(2), 233-250, https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2246023.
23. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage, London.
24. MoNE. (2019). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi. Tebliğler Dergisi, 82(2747), 391-419.
25. Nacaroğlu, O., & Bozdağ, T. (2020). An investigation into the perceptions of gifted students on environmental problems by using word association test. GUJGEF, 40(2), 385-409.
26. Nacaroğlu, O., & Kızkapan, O. (2021). Gifted students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 275-287. DOI: 10.17509/jsl.v4i3.31995
27. Nicholas, M., Skourdoumbis, A., & Bradbury, O. (2024). Meeting the needs and potentials of high-ability, high-performing, and gifted students via differentiation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(2), 154-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231222225
28. Özkan, Y., & Dökme, İ. (2024). Syrian migrant students’ attitudes toward science: A comparative analysis with their Turkish peers, Phase I. School Science and Mathematics, 124(4), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12639
29. Pacheco, C. S., & Herrera, C. I. (2021). A conceptual proposal and operational definitions of the cognitive processes of complex thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100794
30. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York International Universities Press (Margaret Cook, Trans).
31. Ribeiro, T., & Orion, N. (2021). Educating for a holistic view of the earth system: A review. Geosciences, 11(12), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11120485
32. Rojas, T., Mula, J., & Sanchis, R. (2023). Quantitative modelling approaches for lean manufacturing under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 62(16), 5989–6015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2293138
33. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In: R.C. Anderson, R.J. Sapiro, and W. E. Montague, eds. Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 99–135.
34. Sadza, A., Daalmans, S., Rozendaal, E., & Buijzen, M. (2023). Risk on demand? A quantitative content analysis of the portrayal of risky health behaviors in popular on demand content. Health Communication, 39(10), 2090–2099. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2255762
35. Sarmiento, F. O., Inaba, N., Iida, Y., & Yoshida, M. (2023). Mountain graticules: Bridging latitude, longitude, altitude, and historicity to biocultural heritage. Geographies, 3(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3010002
36. Sikumbang, D., Rakhmawati, I., & Suwandi, T. (2019). Investigating the cognitive structure of biology preservice teacher about central dogma of molecular biology through word association test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (1155) 012047. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012047
37. Singh, M., Joshi, M., Tyagi, K. D., & Tyagi, V. B. (2024). Future professions in agriculture, medicine, education, fitness, research and development, transport, and communication. In Topics in Artificial Intelligence Applied to Industry 4.0 (eds M. Ragab AL-Refaey, A.K. Tyagi, A.S. AL-Malaise AL-Ghamdi and S. Kukreja). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394216147.ch10
38. Skarstein, F., & Wolff, L. A. (2020). An issue of scale: The challenge of time, space and multitude in sustainability and geography education. Education Sciences, 10(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020028
39. Stein, D. J. (1992). Schemas in the cognitive and clinical sciences: An integrative construct. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 2(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101236
40. Thomas, D. S. (2022). Geography needs science, science needs geography. Environment and Planning F, 1(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825221082161
41. Tian, J., Koh, J. H. L., Ren, C., & Wang, Y. (2022). Understanding higher education students’ developing perceptions of geocapabilities through the creation of story maps with geographical information systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53, 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13176
42. Tolochko, P., & Vadrot, A. B. M. (2021). Selective world-building: Collaboration and regional specificities in the marine biodiversity field. Environmental Science & Policy, 126, 79-89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.003.
43. Ürek, H., & Dolu, G. (2020). A case study utilizing the cognitive structures of exceptionally talented students regarding chemical change via word association. Gifted Education International, 36(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429419888895
44. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge Harvard University Press
45. Wiyono, B. B., Imron, A., Sumarsono, R. B., Musa, K., & Binti Mohd. Saat, R. (2025). The effect of constructivist learning and project-based learning model on students’ entrepreneurial competence in higher education. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2557606
46. Yang, E., Yao, Q., Long, B., An, N., & Liu, Y. (2024). Progress in the research of features and characteristics of mountainous rural settlements: Distribution, issues, and trends. Sustainability, 16(11), 4410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114410
47. Yücel, E. Ö., & Özkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students’ cognitive structure, and misconception in ecological concepts through word association test. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 660-674. DOI:10.5897/ERR2014.2022
48. Žerak, U., & Juriševič, M. (2023). Exploring mental representations of prospective teachers about gifted education using associative group analysis. High Ability Studies, 35(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2023.2280658
49. Zhang, J., Gu, Y., Ge, J., Opoku Antwi, C., An, Z., Yu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2024). How well does nature contact promote academic achievement in geography? The serial multiple mediating effects of sense of place and geospatial thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2355672
50. Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Qiao, Z., & Li, P. (2024). Students’ response to ChatGPT: an adaptive technology-to-performance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2024.2386546