Tanzimat Dönemi (1839-1876) İaşe Politikaları

Abstract

Osmanlı Devleti’nin yenileşme alanında mihenk taşlarından sayılan Tanzimat Fermanı’nın genellikle yönetim, askerî ve toplumsal alana birçok yenilik getirdiği kabul edilir. Fakat yapılan çalışmalar çoğunlukla ekonomik alanda baş gösteren değişimleri arka plana atmaktadır. Bu çalışmamızda pek ilgilenilmeyen ekonomik değişimlere iaşecilik (provizyonizm) özelinde ışık tutmaya çalışılacaktır. Ayrıca çalışmamızda Tanzimat döneminde halkın, ordunun ve İstanbul’un yani saray halkının ihtiyaç duyduğu her türlü mal ve hizmetlerin karşılanması için uygulanan başlıca politikalar ve düzenlemeler üzerinde durulacaktır. Devlet’in bu süreçte ne tür sorunlarla baş etmeye çalıştığını bilmek günümüz yöneticileri için bir öğüt belki de bir ders niteliği taşıyacaktır. Tüm bunların yanında çalışmamız Osmanlı ekonomisi alanında yapılan araştırmalara yardımcı bir kaynak ve döneme farklı bir bakış açısıyla bakabilmemize olanak sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

• İstanbul,Tanzimat,İaşe,Ticaret,Halk

The Tanzimat Period Politics of Subsistence (1839-1876)

Abstract

It is accepted that the Tanzimat Fermanı, considered as the cornerstones of the Ottoman Empire in the field of innovation, brought many innovations to the administrative, military and social fields in general. However, various books, articles and thesis studies have been done to examine the issue of subsistence in the Ottoman region in general and it is seen that more extensive studies are insufficient for this issue. For this reason, it is tried to shed light on the issue of provocationism in the Tanzimat period, which has not been examined sufficiently until now, in terms of socio-economic and more comprehensive. It will also focus on the main policies and regulations applied to meet the needs of the people, the army and all the goods and services of Istanbul, the palace efradının during the Tanzimat period. The understanding of the social state in the Ottoman Empire will be better understood by examining the related publications and scanning them. At the end of the article, the Ottoman administrators will be made aware of what kind of measures they can take to make their lives more comfortable. Knowing what the state is trying to cope with in this process will have a qualification to shed light on the past for our managers today. Besides this, it is believed that this article will contribute to the study of the Tanzimat period as an aid to Ottoman socio-economic research and a different perspective of the period.

It is accepted that the Tanzimat Fermanı, considered as the cornerstones of the Ottoman Empire in the field of innovation, brought many innovations to the administrative, military and social fields in general. However, various books, articles and thesis studies have been done to examine the issue of subsistence in the Ottoman region in general and it is seen that more extensive studies are insufficient for this issue. For this reason, it is tried to shed light on the issue of provocationism in the Tanzimat period, which has not been examined sufficiently until now, in terms of socio-economic and more comprehensive. It will also focus on the main policies and regulations applied to meet the needs of the people, the army and all the goods and services of Istanbul, the palace efradının during the Tanzimat period. The understanding of the social state in the Ottoman Empire will be better understood by examining the related publications and scanning them. At the end of the article, the Ottoman administrators will be made aware of what kind of measures they can take to make their lives more comfortable. Knowing what the state is trying to cope with in this process will have a qualification to shed light on the past for our managers today. Besides this, it is believed that this article will contribute to the study of the Tanzimat period as an aid to Ottoman socio-economic research and a different perspective of the period.

Keywords

• İstanbul,Tanzimat,Subsistence,Trade,People

References

1. Öztürk, T. (2018). Tanzimat Dönemi (1839-1876) İaşe Politikaları.