Research Article

Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis'e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi

Volume: 17 Number: 2 May 27, 2020
  • Recep Ay *
  • Mustafa Hakan Balcı
  • Mehmet Ali İnanıcı
TR EN

Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis'e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi

Abstract

javascript:;about:blank#blockedBu çalışmada bazı pestisitlerin Tetranychus urticae ve Phytoseiulus persimilis'e etkileri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada etoxazole, bifenthrin, cyromazine ve acequinocyl etkin maddelerine sahip ilaçlar kullanılmıştır. İlaçlar her iki akara da tarla uygulama dozunda larva ve  ergin dönemlerine petri kabı-ilaçlama kulesi yöntemi ile uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerden yararlanarak ilaçların etkisi Abott formülüne göre hesaplanmıştır. Farklı etkin maddeye sahip ilaçların T. urticae ve P. persimilis’ e karşı etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır.

Elde edilen sonuçlara göre bifenthrin ve acequinocyl T. urticae ve P. persimilis'nin  her iki dönemine de  % 90 – 100 arasında etki göstermiştir. Etoxazole ve cyromazine  ise P. persimilis''nin  her iki döneminde % 90' ın üzerinde etki göstermiştir. Etoxazole T. urticae'nin larva dönemine %100 etki göstermiştir. Cyromazine ise T. urticae'nin her iki döneminde önemli bir etki göstermemiştir. 

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott, WS. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18(1): 256–267.Alzoubi, S., & Cobanoglu, S. (2007). Effects of sublethal dose of different pesticides on the two-spotted spider mite" Tetranychus urticae Koch" and its predatory mites under greenhouse conditions. World J. Agric. Sci, 3(6), 764-770.Alzoubi, S., & Cobanoglu, S. (2008). Toxicity of some pesticides against Tetranychus urticae and its predatory mites under laboratory conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 3(1), 30-37.Argolo, P. S., Jacas, J. A., & Urbaneja, A. (2014). Comparative toxicity of pesticides in three phytoseiid mites with different life-style occurring in citrus: Euseius stipulatus, Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis. Experimental and applied acarology, 62(1), 33-46.Attia, S., Grissa, K. L., Lognay, G., Bitume, E., Hance, T., & Mailleux, A. C. (2013). A review of the major biological approaches to control the worldwide pest Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) with special reference to natural pesticides. Journal of Pest Science, 86(3), 361-386.Ay, R. (2005). Determination of susceptibility and resistance of some greenhouse populations of Tetranychus urticae Koch to chlorpyrifos (Dursban 4) by the petri dish–Potter tower method. Journal of Pest Science, 78(3), 139-143.Blümel S, Walzer A. (2002). Efficacy of different release strategies of Neoseiulus californicus McGregor and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for the control of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) on greenhouse cut roses. Sys. Appl. Acarol. 7:35–48.Bresch, C., Ruiz, G., Poncet, C., & Parolin, P. (2015). Predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis chose plants with domatia. J. Mediterranean Ecol. 13:13-20.Chacón-Hernández, J. C., E. Cerna-Chávez, F. Reyes-Zepeda, G. Gaona-García, M. Rocandio-Rodríguez, y J. LanderosFlores. 2017. Respuesta funcional de Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot sobre cuatro estados de desarrollo de Tetranychus urticae Koch sobre discos de rosal. Southwest Entomol. 42: 485-492.Chacon-Hernandez, J. C., Camacho-Aguilar, I., Cerna-Chavez, E., Ordaz-Silva, S., Ochoa-Fuentes, Y. M., & Landeros-Flores, J. (2018). Effects Of Tetranychus urticae and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarı: Tetranychıdae: Phytoseııdae) on the chlorophyll of rosal plants (Rosa sp.). Agrocıencıa, 52(6), 895-909.Cote, K. W., Lewis, E. E., & Schultz, P. B. (2002). Compatibility of acaricide residues with Phytoseiulus persimilis and their effects on Tetranychus urticae. HortScience, 37(6), 906-909.Ditillo, J. L., Kennedy, G. G., & Walgenbach, J. F. (2016). Effects of insecticides and fungicides commonly used in tomato production on Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phtyoseiidae). Journal of economic entomology,6: 2298–2308.Escudero, L. A., and F. Ferragut. (2005). Life-history of predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on four spider mite species as prey, with special reference to Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biol. Control. 32: 378-384.Fathipour, Y., Karimi, M., Farazmand, A., & Ali, A. T. (2017). Age-specific functional response and predation capacity of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Phytoseiidae) on the two-spotted spider mite. Acarologia, 58(1), 31-40.Grbic, M., Van Leeuwen, T., Clark, R. M., Rombauts, S., Rouze, P., Grbic, V., Osborne, E.J., Dermauw, W., and Ngoc, P .C. (2011). The genome of Tetranychus urticae reveals herbivorous pest adaptations. Bulletin of the Entolomological Society of Egypt LVIII: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10640Gyuris, E., Szép, E., Kontschán, J., Hettyey, A., & Tóth, Z. (2018). Efficiency against the Two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and prey-age-related choice of three predatory mites. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 64(1), 75-90.Hassan, S. A. (1992). Side Effect Tests for Phytoseiids and Their Rearing Methods. Meeting of the Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 15(3), 61–74.Heinz K.M., Van Driesche R.M., Parrella M.P. (2004). Biocontrol in protected culture. Batavia, II. West Chicago, US, Ball Publishing. 560 p.HelleW.,SabelisM.W., (1985) Spidermites, their biology, natural enemies and control (Vol.1P.458)— Amsterdam, Elsevier Alipour Z., Fathipour Y., Farazmand A. (2016). Age stage predationcapacity of Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on susceptible and resistant rose cultivars — Int. J. Acarol.,42(4): 224-228. doi:10.1080/01647954.2016.1171797Hussey N.W., Scopes N. (1985). Biological Pest Control The Glasshouse Experience. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 50–51.Irigaray, F. J. S. D. C., Zalom, F. G., & Thompson, P. B. (2007). Residual toxicity of acaricides to Galendromus occidentalis and Phytoseiulus persimilis reproductive potential. Biological Control, 40(2), 153-159.Jeppson, L. R., Keifer, H. H. & Baker, E. W. (1975): Mites injurious to economic plants. – Uni¬versity of California Press, California, 528 ppJhonson W.T., Lyon, H.H. (1991). Insects that feed on trees and shrubs. Cornell University, IthacaKropczynska D., Tomczyk, A. (1996). Development of Tetranychus urticae Koch and Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisd. populations on sweet pepper and Phytoseiulus persimilis (AH.) effectiveness in their control. IOBC WPRS Bulletin 19: 71_74.Maleknia B., Fathipour Y., Soufbaf M. (2016b). Intraguild predation among three phytoseiid species, Neoseiulus barkeri, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius swirskii. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 21: 417-426.McMurtry J.A., De Moraes G.J., Sourassou N.F. (2013). Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18: 297-320. doi:10.11158/saa.18.4.1Whalon, M.E., R.M. Mota-Sanchez, R.M., Hollingworth L. Duynslager, Arthropods Resistant to Pesticides Database (ARPD). , 2014 (accessed 30.10.14).Niu, Z. M., Xie, P., Yu, L., & Bi, J. L. (2014). Efficacy of selected acaricides against the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on strawberries in greenhouse production. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 3(1), 235-239.Numa, S., Rodríguez, L., Rodríguez, D., & Coy-Barrera, E. (2015). Susceptibility of Tetranychus urticae Koch to an ethanol extract of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius leaves under laboratory conditions. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 338.Sarwar, M. (2014). Influence of host plant species on the development, fecundity and population density of pest Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) and predator Neoseiulus pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke)(Acari: Phytoseiidae). New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 42(1), 10-20.Skirvin D.J., Williams M., Fenlon K., Sunderland J. (2002). Modelling the effects of plants on biocontrol effectiveness in ornamental nursery crops. Journal Applied Ecology: 469–480.Sterk G., Hassan S.A., Baillod M., Bakker F., Bigler F., Blümel S., Bogenschütz H., Boller E., Bromand B., Brun J., et al. (1999). Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms’. BioControl 44: 99–117Van Leeuwen, T., Vontas, J., Tsagkarakou, A., Dermauw, W., & Tirry, L. (2010). Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: a review. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology, 40(8), 563-572.Van Leeuwen, T., Tirry, L., Yamamoto, A., Nauen, R., & Dermauw, W. (2015). The economic importance of acaricides in the control of phytophagous mites and an update on recent acaricide mode of action research. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 121, 12-21.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 27, 2020

Submission Date

July 30, 2019

Acceptance Date

February 11, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 17 Number: 2

APA
Ay, R., Balcı, M. H., & İnanıcı, M. A. (2020). Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.598391
AMA
1.Ay R, Balcı MH, İnanıcı MA. Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;17(2):172-179. doi:10.33462/jotaf.598391
Chicago
Ay, Recep, Mustafa Hakan Balcı, and Mehmet Ali İnanıcı. 2020. “Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus Urticae Ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus Persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin Incelenmesi”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17 (2): 172-79. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.598391.
EndNote
Ay R, Balcı MH, İnanıcı MA (May 1, 2020) Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17 2 172–179.
IEEE
[1]R. Ay, M. H. Balcı, and M. A. İnanıcı, “Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi”, Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 172–179, May 2020, doi: 10.33462/jotaf.598391.
ISNAD
Ay, Recep - Balcı, Mustafa Hakan - İnanıcı, Mehmet Ali. “Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus Urticae Ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus Persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin Incelenmesi”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17/2 (May 1, 2020): 172-179. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.598391.
JAMA
1.Ay R, Balcı MH, İnanıcı MA. Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;17:172–179.
MLA
Ay, Recep, et al. “Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus Urticae Ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus Persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin Incelenmesi”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 2, May 2020, pp. 172-9, doi:10.33462/jotaf.598391.
Vancouver
1.Recep Ay, Mustafa Hakan Balcı, Mehmet Ali İnanıcı. Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis’e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020 May 1;17(2):172-9. doi:10.33462/jotaf.598391

Cited By