BibTex RIS Cite

Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA

Year 2006, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 161 - 167, 01.06.2006

Abstract

References

  • Abay, C., B. Miran and C. Günden, 2004. An analysis of input use efficiency in sunflower production with respect to sustainability: the case study of Turkey. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 24:123-143
  • Banker, R.D., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Managerial Science 30: 1078-1092
  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European. Journal of Operational Research. 2: 429-444
  • Coelli, T., D.S.P. Rao, and G.E. Battese, 1998. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 275 p.
  • Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. Ser. 'A' 120: 253-281
  • Färe, R., R. Grabowski and S. Grosskopf, 1985. Technical efficiency of Philippine agriculture. Applied Economics. 17: 205-214
  • Fraser, I. and D. Cordina, 1999. An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Systems. 59: 267-282
  • Günden, C., B. Miran and M.A. Sarı, 1998. Productivity and efficiency change in Turkish Agriculture: An application of data envelopment analysis. Turkey III. Agricultural Economics Congress, Ankara 7-9 October, p. 324-339
  • Günden, C., B. Miran and B. Türkekul, 1999. Comparative analysis of European countries in terms of productivity, technology and efficiency change in agricultural production. IV. National Econometrics and Statistics Symposium, Antalya, 14-16 May, p.383-395
  • Günden, C., B. Karlı and B. Miran, 1999. The Effects of the southern anatolia project on productivity and efficiency of agricultural production. SAP I. Agricultural Congress, Urfa, 26-28 May, p. 291-302
  • Günden, C. and B. Miran, 2001. Technical Efficiency in Cotton Production: A Case Study, The Union of Turkish Chambers of Agriculture, Publication No: 211
  • Lovell, C.A.K., 1993. Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency Techniques and Applications. ((Eds.) Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp: 3-67
  • Newbold, P., 1995. Statistics for Business and Economics, Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, 867 p.
  • Oil World Annual, 2002. ISTA Mielke GmbH.
  • Shafiq, M. and T. Rehman, 2000. The extent of resource use inefficiencies in cotton production in Pakistan's Punjap: an application of data envelopment analysis. Agricultural. Economics Review. 22: 321-330
  • Unakıtan, G. 2003. An Econometric Analysis of Demand, Supply and Foreign Trade of Sunflower in Turkey, Ph.D. Thesis, Trakya University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 1 p.

Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA

Year 2006, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 161 - 167, 01.06.2006

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ayçiçeği üretiminde kaynakların ne kadar etkin kullanıldığını belirlemektir. Etkinliğin ölçülmesinde kullanılan veri seti, en önemli ayçiçeği üretim yeri olan Trakya bölgesindeki Tekirdağ, Kırklareli ve Edirne illerinden toplanmıştır. Trakya bölgesi, yaklaşık 307 bin hektar ekiliş alanıyla Türkiye’deki toplam ekiliş alanının %57’sini ve 498 bin ton ile toplam üretim miktarının %62’sini karşılamaktadır. Veriler, 197 üretici ile karşılıklı görüşme yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Etkinlik ölçümleri, her bir il için ölçeğe göre sabit getirili veri zarflama yöntemi yardımıyla yapılmıştır. Etkinlik değerleri, ölçümlerden daha fazla bilgi elde edebilmek için saf teknik etkinlik ve ölçek etkinliğine ayrıştırılmıştır. Çalışmada çıktı olarak toplam ayçiçeği üretimi (kg), temel girdiler olarak ekiliş alanı (da), işgücü (saat), traktör çekigücü (saat), azot kullanımı (kg), tohumluk (kg) ve pestisid kullanımı (kg) dikkate alınmıştır. Bölge genelinde ortalama teknik etkinlik 0.672 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Hiç bir ilin ayçiçeği üretiminde etkinliği sağlayamadığı, bununla birlikte Tekirdağ ilinin kaynak kullanımı açısından diğerlerine göre daha başarılı olduğu belirlenmiştir. En yüksek saf teknik etkinlik ve ölçek etkinliği değeri yine Tekirdağ iline aittir. Tüm iller dikkate alındığında, etkin olmayan üretimin nedeni, hem optimal ölçekte üretim yapamamak, hem de mevcut üretimi en az girdi kullanarak gerçekleştirememektir. Verim, etkinliği arttıran bir faktördür

References

  • Abay, C., B. Miran and C. Günden, 2004. An analysis of input use efficiency in sunflower production with respect to sustainability: the case study of Turkey. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 24:123-143
  • Banker, R.D., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Managerial Science 30: 1078-1092
  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European. Journal of Operational Research. 2: 429-444
  • Coelli, T., D.S.P. Rao, and G.E. Battese, 1998. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 275 p.
  • Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. Ser. 'A' 120: 253-281
  • Färe, R., R. Grabowski and S. Grosskopf, 1985. Technical efficiency of Philippine agriculture. Applied Economics. 17: 205-214
  • Fraser, I. and D. Cordina, 1999. An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Systems. 59: 267-282
  • Günden, C., B. Miran and M.A. Sarı, 1998. Productivity and efficiency change in Turkish Agriculture: An application of data envelopment analysis. Turkey III. Agricultural Economics Congress, Ankara 7-9 October, p. 324-339
  • Günden, C., B. Miran and B. Türkekul, 1999. Comparative analysis of European countries in terms of productivity, technology and efficiency change in agricultural production. IV. National Econometrics and Statistics Symposium, Antalya, 14-16 May, p.383-395
  • Günden, C., B. Karlı and B. Miran, 1999. The Effects of the southern anatolia project on productivity and efficiency of agricultural production. SAP I. Agricultural Congress, Urfa, 26-28 May, p. 291-302
  • Günden, C. and B. Miran, 2001. Technical Efficiency in Cotton Production: A Case Study, The Union of Turkish Chambers of Agriculture, Publication No: 211
  • Lovell, C.A.K., 1993. Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency Techniques and Applications. ((Eds.) Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp: 3-67
  • Newbold, P., 1995. Statistics for Business and Economics, Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, 867 p.
  • Oil World Annual, 2002. ISTA Mielke GmbH.
  • Shafiq, M. and T. Rehman, 2000. The extent of resource use inefficiencies in cotton production in Pakistan's Punjap: an application of data envelopment analysis. Agricultural. Economics Review. 22: 321-330
  • Unakıtan, G. 2003. An Econometric Analysis of Demand, Supply and Foreign Trade of Sunflower in Turkey, Ph.D. Thesis, Trakya University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 1 p.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

C. Günden B. Miran G. Unakıtan This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2006
Submission Date November 2, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Unakıtan, C. G. B. M. G. (2006). Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 161-167.
AMA Unakıtan CGBMG. Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA. JOTAF. June 2006;3(2):161-167.
Chicago Unakıtan, C. Günden B. Miran G. “Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 3, no. 2 (June 2006): 161-67.
EndNote Unakıtan CGBMG (June 1, 2006) Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 3 2 161–167.
IEEE C. G. B. M. G. Unakıtan, “Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA”, JOTAF, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2006.
ISNAD Unakıtan, C. Günden B. Miran G. “Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 3/2 (June 2006), 161-167.
JAMA Unakıtan CGBMG. Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA. JOTAF. 2006;3:161–167.
MLA Unakıtan, C. Günden B. Miran G. “Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 2, 2006, pp. 161-7.
Vancouver Unakıtan CGBMG. Technical Efficiency of Sunflower Production in Trakya Region by DEA. JOTAF. 2006;3(2):161-7.