Türkiye'de Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Populasyonlarının Ayırt Edilmesi İçin Yeni Morfometrik Yaklaşım

Year 2023, Volume: 20 Issue: 3, 653 - 662, 26.09.2023

Meral Kekeçoğlu , Songül Bir , Merve Kambur

https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1213163

Abstract

Günümüzde Antartika kıtası hariç dünyanın her yerinde yayılış gösteren, her biri belirli bir çevresel özelliklere adapte olmuş 29 alt tür tanımlanmıştır. Geçmişten günümüze kadar bal arılarını sınıflandırmak için birçok morfolojik ve morfometrik özellikler kullanılmıştır. Yapılan çalışmalarda ön kanatlardan gelen uzunluk, açı ve indeksler gibi özelliklerin sınıflandırma için çok etkili olduğu bildirilmiştir. Son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalarda çeşitli programlar geliştirilmiş, arı kanatlarının görüntüleri aracılığıyla otomatik sınıflandırma yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada sağ ön kanatta yer alan 7 alan (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7) ölçülerek Türkiye'de doğal olarak bulunan bal arısı biyoçeşitliliğinin belirlenmesine çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla Türkiye'nin 19 ilindeki 143 koloniden toplam 3392 işçi arı örneği toplanmıştır. Hazırlanan preparatların fotoğrafları BAB STR45 stereozoom mikroskobuna bağlı BAB kamera sistemiyle 1X büyütmede çekilmiştir. Türkiye’de yayılış gösteren bal arısı populasyonlarının sağ ön kanatları üzerindeki 7 alanın ölçümleri BAB Bs200ProP programında otomatik olarak yapılmıştır. Her ile ait alan ölçümlerinin ham verilerinin koloni ortalamaları alınarak sonuçlar SPSS.15 paket programında Diskriminant Fonksiyon Analizi (DFA) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Grup içi ve gruplar arası varyasyonun belirlenmesinde grupları ayırmada çok değişkenli varyans analizi (MANOVA) uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonucunda minimum toplam alan 4.51 ile Van'da görülürken maksimum toplam alan 5.76 ile Ardahan’da görülmüştür. Ölçülen alanların ortalama büyüklüğü Türkiye'nin kuzey doğusundan güneyine doğru azalmıştır. Ön kanattaki alan ölçümlerinin Anadolu (A. m. anatoliaca) ve Kafkas (A. m. caucasica) bal arılarını ayırt etmede kullanılabilecek bir marker olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

Anadolu bal arısı (A. m. anatoliaca), Kafkas bal arısı (A. m. caucasica), Ön kanat, alan, Türkiye

New Morphometric Approach to Discriminate Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Populations in Türkiye

Abstract

Today, 29 subspecies have been defined, each of which is adapted to a certain set of environmental characteristics, spreading all over the world except Antarctica. Many morphological and morphometric features have been used to classify honey bees from the past to the present. It has been reported that features such as length, angle and indices coming from the front wings are very efficient for classification. In recent studies, various programs have been developed and automatic classification has been attempted through the images of bee wings. This study aimed to determine the naturally occurring honey bee biodiversity in Turkiye by measuring 7 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7) on the right front wing. For this purpose, a total of 3392 worker bee samples were collected from 143 colonies in 19 provinces of Turkiye. The photographs of the prepared preparations were taken at 1X magnification with the BAB camera system connected to the BAB STR45 stereozoom microscope. The measurements of 7 areas on the right front wings of honey bee populations distributed in Turkiye were made automatically in the BAB Bs200ProP program. Colony averages of the raw data of the area measurements of each province were taken and the results were evaluated with Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) in the SPSS.15 package program. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was applied to separate the groups to determine the variation within and between groups. As a result of this study, the minimum total area was seen in Van at 4.51 and the maximum total area was seen in Ardahan at 5.76. The average size of the measured areas decreased from the north-east to the south of Turkiye. Area measurements on the forewing were found to be a marker for distinguishing Anatolian (A. m. anatoliaca) and Caucasian (A. m. caucasica) honey bees.

Keywords

Türkiye, Anatolian honey bee (A. m. anatoliaca), Caucasican honeybee (A. m. caucasica), Front Wing, Area

References

• Adam, Br. (1983). In Search of The Best Strains of Bees. Dadant Sons, Hamilton Illinois.
• Bir, S. and Kekeçoğlu, M. (2023). Düzce bal arısı populasyonlarında morfometrik ve mtDNA çeşitliliği üzerine arıcılığın etkileri. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi , 26(4): 938-951.
• Bodenheimer, F. S. (1941). Studies on The Honeybee and Beekeeping in Türkiye. Merkez Ziraat Mücadela Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Bodur, Ç., Kence, M. and Kence, A. (2004). Genetic Structure and Origin Determination in Honeybee Populations of Anatolia, First European Conference of Apidology, P. 40., 19-23 September, Udine. Bodur, Ç., Kence, M. and Kence, A. (2007). Genetic structure of honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) populations of Türkiye inferred from microsatellite analysis. Journal of Apicultural Research, 46(1): 50-56.
• Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data, Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press; New York, USA.
• Buttel-Reepen, H. (1906). Apistica. Beitrage zur Systematic, Biologie, sowie zur geschichtlichen und Geographischen Verbreitung der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L), ihrer Varietaten und der übrigen Apis-Arten. Veroff Zool Mus Berlin 118-120.
• Çakmak, İ., Fuchs, S., Çakmak, S. S., Koca, A. Ö., Nentchev, P. and Kandemir, İ. (2014). Morphometric analysis of honeybees ditributed in northern Türkiye along the black sea coast. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 14(2): 59-68.
• Cavalcanti, M. J., Monterio, L. R. and Lopes, P. R. D. (1999). Landmark-based morphometric analysis in selected species of serrnid fishes (Perciformes: Teleostei). Zoological Studies, 38(3): 287-294.
• Cornuet, J. and Fresnaye, J. (1989). Biometrical study of honey bee populations from Spain and Portugal. Apidologie, 20:93-101.
• Darendelioglu, Y., Kence, A., (1992). Morphometric Study on Population Structure of Middle Anatolia Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera, Apidae). The Second Turkish National Congress of Entomolgy. Adana, Türkiye. 387-396.
• DuPraw, E. (1965). Non-Linnear taxonomy and the systematics of honey bees. Systematic Zoology, 14:1-24. Franck, P., Garnery, L., Solignac, M. and Cornuet, J. M. (2000). Molecular confirmation of a fourth lineage in honeybees from the near east. Apidologie, 31:167–180.
• Francoy, T. M., Prado, P. R. R., Gonçalves, L. S. and De Jong, D. (2006). Morphometric differences in a single wing cell can discriminate Apis mellifera racial types. Apidologie, 37: 91-97.
• Francoy, T. M., Silva, R. A. O., Nunes-Silva, P., Menezes, C. and Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L. (2009a) Gender identification of five genera of stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini) based on wing morphology. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8(1):207-214.
• Francoy, T. M., Wittmann, D., Steinhage, V., Drauschke, M., Müller, S., Cunha, D. R., Nascimento, A. M., Figueiredo, V. L. C., Simoes, Z. L. P., DeJong, D., Arias, M. C. and Gonçalves, L. S. (2009b). Morphometric and genetic changes in a population of Apis mellifera after 34 years of africanization. Genetic and Molecular Research, 8(2): 709-717.
• Güler, A. (2000). The effects of narrowed area and additional feding on some physiological characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science, 24: 1–6.
• Güler, A. and Bek., Y. (2002). Forewing angles of honey bee (Apis mellifera) samples 87 from different regions of Türkiye. Journal of Apicultural Research, 41(2): 43-49.
• Güler, A. and Kaftanoglu, O. (1999a). Morphological characters of some important races and ecotypes of Turkish honeybees (Apis mellifera L.)-I. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences. 23 (3): 565-575.
• Güler, A. and Kaftanoglu, O. (1999b). Morphological characters of some important races and ecotypes of Turkish honeybees (Apis mellifera L.)-II. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences. 23(3): 571-575.
• Güler, A. and Kaftanoglu, O. (1999c). Discrimination of some Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) races and ecotypes by using morphological characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences. 23:565-575.
• Güler, A. and Toy, H. (2008). Morphological characteristics of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) of the Sinop Türkeli Region. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 23(3): 190-197.
• Güler, A., Akyol., E, Gökçe, M. and Kaftanoglu, O., (2002). The discrimination of Artvin and Ardahan honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) using morphological characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 26:595-603.
• Güler, A., Bıyık, S. and Güler, M. (2013). Morphological characterization of the honey bee (Apis Mellifera L.) population of The Western Black Sea Region. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(1): 39-46.
• Güler, A., Kaftanoglu, O., Bek, Y. and Yeninar, H. (1999). Discrimination of some Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) races and ecotypes by usingmorphological characteristics, Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences. 23 Ek sayı 3:565-575.
• Hayes, D. M., Minton, R. L. and Perez, K. E. (2007) Elimia comalensis (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae) from the Edwards Plateau, Texas: Multiple Unrecognized Endemics or Native Exotic? The American Midland Naturalist, 158:97-112.
• Kambur, M. and Kekeçoğlu, M. (2018). The loss of genetic diversity on native Turkish honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) subspecies. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33: 73-84.
• Kandemir, İ. and Kence, A. (1995). Allozym variability in a central Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) population. Apidologie, 26: 503-510.
• Kandemir, İ., Kandemir, G., Kence, M., İnci, A. and Kence, A. (1995). Morphometrical and Electrophoretical Discrimination of Honeybees From Different Regions of Türkiye. XXXIV. International Apicultural congress in Apimondia, 14-19 August, Llusanne, Switzerland.
• Kandemir, İ., Kence, M. and Kence, A. (2000). Genetic and morphometric variation in honeybee (Apis mellifera) population of Türkiye. Apidology, 31: 343-356.
• Kandemir, İ., Kence, M. and Kence, A. (2005). Morphometric and electrophoretic variation in different honeybees (Apis mellifera) population. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences. 29: 885-890.
• Kandemir, İ., Kence, M., Sheppard, W. S. and Kence, A. (2006a). Mitochondrial DNA variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations from Türkiye. Journal of Apicultural Research and Bee World, 45(1): 33-38.
• Kandemir, İ., Meixner, M. D., Özkan, A. and Sheppard, W. S. (2006b). Genetic charecterization of honey bee (Apis mellifera cypria) populations in northern cyprus. Apidologie, 37(5): 547-555.
• Kandemir, İ., Pinto, M. A., Meixner, M. D. and Sheppard, W. S. (2006c). Hinf-I digestion of cytochrome oxidase I region is not a diagnostic test for A. m. lamarckii. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 29(4): 747-749.
• Kekeçoğlu M. (2007). A Comparative Investigation of Honeybee Ecotypes of Turkiye By Means of mtDNA and Some Morphological Traits. (PhD Thesis). Namık Kemal University. Tekirdağ, Türkiye.
• Kekeçoğlu, M. (2018). Morphometric divergence of Anatolian honey bees through loss of original traits: A dangerous outcome of Turkish apiculture. Sociobiology, 65(2): 232-243.
• Kekeçoğlu, M. and Soysal, M. İ. (2010). Genetic diversity of bee ecotypes in Türkiye and evidence for geographical differences. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 15(5): 5646-5653.
• Kekeçoğlu, M., Bouga, M. İ., Soysal, İ. and Harizanis, P. (2007). Morphometrics as a tool for the study of genetic variability of honey bees. Journal of Tekirdağ Agricultural Faculty, 4(1): 7-15.
• Kekeçoğlu, M., Kambur, Bir, S., Uçak, M. and Çaprazlı, T. (2020). Biodiversity of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in Türkiye by geometric morphometric analysis. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 13(3): 282-289.
• Kekeçoğlu, M., Şimşek, G., Soysal M. İ. and Gürcan E. K. (2009). Two-level factor analysis of morphometric characters of honeybees population sampled (Apis mellifera L.) in Türkiye. Journal of Tekirdağ Agricultural Faculty, 6(1): 21-30.
• Kimmerle, E. H., Ross, A. and Slice, D. (2008) Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. Journal Forensic Science, 53:54-57.
• Koca, A. Ö. and Kandemir İ. (2013). Comparison of two morphometric methods for discriminating honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 37(2): 205-210.
• Maa, T. C. (1953). An inquiry into the systematics of the Tribus apidini or honeybees (Hymenoptera). Treubia, 21: 525-640.
• Mendes, M. F. M., Francoy, T. M., Nunes-Sılva, P., Menezes, C. and Imperatrız-Fonseca, L. (2007) Intra-Populational variability of nannotrigona testaceicornis lepeletier, 1836 (Hymenoptera, Meliponini) using relative warp analysis. Bioscience Journal., 23:147-152.
• Miguel, I., Baylac, M., Iriondo, M., Manzano, C., Garnery, L. and Estonba, A. (2011). Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch. Apidologie, 42(2):150–161.
• Nolte, A. W. and Sheets H. D. (2005). Shape based assignment test suggest transgressive phenotypes in natural sculpin hybrids (Teleostei, Scorpaeniformes, Cottida). Frontiers in Zoology, 2: 1-11.
• Oettle, A. C., Pretorius E. and Steyn M. (2005). Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus flexure. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128:623-629.
• Ogıhara, N., Makıshıma, H. and Ishıda H. (2008). Geometric morphometric study of temporal variations in human crania excavated from the Himrin Basin and neighboring areas, northern Iraq. Anthropologıcal Scıence, 117(1): 9–17.
• Özdil, F., Fakhri, B., Meydan, H., Yildiz, M. A., and Hall, H. G. (2009b). Mitochondrial DNA variation in the CoxI-CoxII intergenic region among Turkish and Iranian honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Biochemical Genetics, 47: 717-721.
• Özdil, F., Oskay, D., Işık, R., Yatkın, S., Aydın, A. and Güler, A. (2022). "Morphometric and genetic characterization of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) from Thrace Region of Turkiye. Journal of Apicultural Science, 66(1): 67-83.
• Özdil, F., Yildiz, M. A. and Hall, H. G. (2009a). Molecular characterization of Turkish honey bee populations (Apis mellifera) inferred from mitochondrial DNA RFLP and sequence results. Apidologie, 40(5): 570-576.
• Palmer, M. N., Smith, D. R. and Kaftanoglu O. (2000) Turkish Honeybees: Genetic variation and evidence for a fourth lineage of Apis mellifera mtDNA. The Journal of Heredity, 91: 42-46.
• Rahimi, A., Mirmoayedi, A., Kahrizi, D., Zarei, L. and Jamali, S. (2018). Genetic variation in Iranian honey bees, Apis mellifera meda Skorikow, 1829, (Hymenoptera: Apidae) inferred from PCR-RFLP analysis of two mtDNA gene segments (COI and 16S rDNA). Sociobiology, 65(3): 482-490.
• Rinderer, T. E., Daly H. V., Sylvester, H. A., Collins, A. M., Buco, S. M., Helmıch, R. L. and Danka, R. G. (1990). Morphometric differences among Africanized and European honey bees and their hybrids (Hymenoptera:Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83: 346-351.
• Rodrigues, P. J., Gomes, W. and Pinto, M. A. (2022). DeepWings©: Automatic wing geometric morphometrics classification of honey bee (Apis mellifera) subspecies using deep learning for detecting landmarks. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(3): 70.
• Rohlf, F. J. (2000a) Statistical power comparisions among alternative morphometric methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 111:463-478.
• Rohlf, F. J. (2000b) Geometric Morphometrics and Phylogeny, Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
• Roth, V., Pogoda, A., Steinhage, V. and Schröder, S. (1999). Pattern recognition combining feature-and pixel-based classification within a real-world application. Mustererkennung. P. 120-129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Ruttner, F. (1987). Breeding techniques and selection for breeding of honeybee. Northern bee Books. Mytholmroyd, UK.
• Ruttner, F. (1988). Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
• Ruttner, F., Tassencourt, L. and Louveaux, J. (1978). Biometrical-statistical analysis of the geographic variability of Apis mellifera L. Apidologie, 9: 363-381.
• Schroder, S., Wittmann, D., Drescher, W., Roth, V., Steinhage, V. and Cremers, A. B. (2002). The new key to bees: automated identification by image analysis of wings. Pollinating bees–the Conservation Link Between Agriculture and Nature, Ministry of Environment Brasilia 209-218.
• Settar, A. (1983). Researches on Aegean region bee species and wandering beekeeping, (PhD Thesis), Ege Agricultural Research Institute, İzmir, Türkiye.
• Sheppard, W. S., Smith, D. R. (2000). Identification of African-derived bees in the Americas: a survey of methods. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93(2): 159-176.
• Smith, D. R., Slaymaker, A., Palmer, M. and Kaftanoglu, O. (1997). Turkish honey bees belong to the east Mediterranean mitochondrial lineage. Apidologie, 28: 269-274.
• Tofilski, A., (2004). Draw Wing, a program for numerical description of insect wings. 5pp. Journal of Insect Science, 4:17, insectscience.org/4.17, (Accessed date: 13.10.2022).
• Uzunov, A., Kiprijanovska, H., Andonov, S., Naumovski, M. and Gregorc, A. (2009). Morphological diversity and racial determination of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) population in the Republic of Macedonia. Journal of Apicultural Research, 48(3): 196-203.