Evaluation of Arsenic (As) Removal from Synthetic Drinking Water Using Under-Sink Filters by ICP-MS
Abstract
Arsenic (As) in drinking water is known to cause serious health issues, and point-of-use under-sink filtration systems are commonly used to mitigate arsenic exposure at the domestic level. The arsenic removal performance of a commercially available reverse osmosis (RO)-based under-sink filtration system was assessed using synthetic drinking water samples and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Arsenic-contaminated synthetic drinking water samples were filtered in the laboratory and analyzed for arsenic content using ICP-MS. The accuracy of the analytical procedure was confirmed by analyzing certified reference materials, namely Enviromat Wastewater Low (EU-L), NIST SRM 1643f, and UME CRM 1201. The obtained recovery percentages ranged from 97.28% to 100.5%, confirming the accuracy and reliability of the analytical technique. The arsenic removal efficiencies achieved by the filtration system ranged from 97.41% to 98.96%, while effluent concentrations remained below internationally accepted drinking water guideline values. The method detection and quantification limits were found to be 0.028 µg/L (LOD) and 0.095 µg/L (LOQ), respectively, indicating sufficient sensitivity for trace-level arsenic measurement.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- 1. Speer RM, Zhou X, Volk LB, Liu KJ, Hudson LG. Arsenic and cancer: Evidence and mechanisms. In: Costa M, editor. Advances in pharmacology. 2023. p. 151–202. Available from:
. - 2. Kaur R, Garkal A, Sarode L, Bangar P, Mehta T, Singh DP, et al. Understanding arsenic toxicity: Implications for environmental exposure and human health. J Hazard Mater Lett. 2024 Nov;5:100090. Available from:
. - 3. Frisbie SH, Mitchell EJ. Arsenic in drinking water: An analysis of global drinking water regulations and recommendations for updates to protect public health. Specht A, editor. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0263505. Available from:
. - 4. Water D. National primary drinking water regulations. Tech fact. 2019;
- 5. Mititelu M, Neacșu SM, Busnatu Ștefan S, Scafa-Udriște A, Andronic O, Lăcraru AE, et al. Assessing heavy metal contamination in food: Implications for human health and environmental safety. Toxics. 2025 Apr 23;13(5):333. Available from:
. - 6. Pezeshki H, Hashemi M, Rajabi S. Removal of arsenic as a potentially toxic element from drinking water by filtration: A mini review of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis techniques. Heliyon. 2023 Mar;9(3):e14246. Available from:
. - 7. Siddique T, Dutta NK, Roy Choudhury N. Nanofiltration for arsenic removal: Challenges, recent developments, and perspectives. Nanomaterials. 2020 Jul 6;10(7):1323. Available from:
. - 8. Kundu S, Naskar MK. Perspective of membrane processes for the removal of arsenic from water: An overview. Trans Indian Ceram Soc. 2021 Jan 2;80(1):28–40. Available from:
.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Analytical Spectrometry
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Sabriye Sel
*
0000-0002-2860-782X
Türkiye
Publication Date
August 26, 2026
Submission Date
February 25, 2026
Acceptance Date
June 12, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 2026 Number: 2
