Research Article

Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential

Volume: 2026 Number: 2 November 5, 2026

Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential

Abstract

Pyridazinones are a versatile class of heterocycles that have been gaining interest in the field of antimicrobial compound development. In the present study, an integrated in silico workflow has been developed for the assessment and prioritization of a small dataset of novel pyridazinones as promising antitubercular compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, recently synthesized and reported in 2025. Molecular docking studies demonstrated favorable binding interactions within the active site of the target protein, with several newly designed derivatives surpassing the binding affinity of the co-crystallized native ligand (-9.6 kcal/mol) and reaching docking energies of up to -11.4 kcal/mol. Subsequent drug-likeness assessment according to Lipinski’s Rule of Five, coupled with ADMET profiling, highlighted compounds 18 and 22 as the most promising candidates, owing to their predicted oral bioavailability, desirable pharmacokinetic characteristics, and favorable toxicity profile. Nevertheless, further 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations and MM/GBSA free energy evaluations rectified the initial static scoring, confirming Compound 22 as the true lead candidate with optimized interactions in the 5V3X binding pocket. The 5V3X-22 complex exhibited high stability, maintaining a steady backbone RMSD of about 0.2 nm, stable ligand RMSD, and key hydrogen bonding interactions throughout the simulation, alongside a conserved radius of gyration and SASA value. According to the MM/GBSA approach, it was possible to conclude that the binding energy of compound 22 is higher and more consistent than that of compound 18 due to increased Van der Waals interactions. Summing up, computational research allowed us to define compound 22 as the most effective potential lead in the series and prepare for in vitro validation of its activity against M. tuberculosis.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Alharbi SA, Wainwright M, Alahmadi TA, Salleeh H Bin, Faden AA, Chinnathambi A. What if Fleming had not discovered penicillin? Saudi J Biol Sci. 2014;21(4):289–93. Available from: .
  2. 2. Mulchandani R, Tiseo K, Nandi A, Klein E, Gandra S, Laxminarayan R, et al. Global trends in inappropriate use of antibiotics, 2000–2021: Scoping review and prevalence estimates. BMJ Public Heal. 2025;3(1):e002411. Available from: .
  3. 3. Pancholia S, Dhameliya TM, Shah P, Jadhavar PS, Sridevi JP, Yogeshwari P, et al. Benzo[ d ]thiazol-2-yl(piperazin-1-yl)methanones as new anti-mycobacterial chemotypes: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and 3D-QSAR studies. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;116:187–99. Available from: .
  4. 4. Xu Z, Gao C, Ren QC, Song XF, Feng LS, Lv ZS. Recent advances of pyrazole-containing derivatives as anti-tubercular agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;139:429–40. Available from: .
  5. 5. WHO. Meeting report of the WHO expert consultation on the definition of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. In: Meeting report of the WHO expert consultation on the definition of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. 2021.
  6. 6. WHO. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 4: Treatment-drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment, 2022 update. 2022.
  7. 7. Falzon D, Zignol M, Bastard M, Floyd K, Kasaeva T. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global tuberculosis epidemic. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1234785. Available from: .
  8. 8. Mori M, Stelitano G, Chiarelli LR, Cazzaniga G, Gelain A, Barlocco D, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and biological evaluation of new derivatives targeting MbtI as antitubercular agents. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14(2):155. Available from: .

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Natural Products and Bioactive Compounds, Biomolecular Modelling and Design

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

November 5, 2026

Submission Date

June 15, 2026

Acceptance Date

September 26, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 2026 Number: 2

APA
El Bouamri, M., Gourmah, B., Bayen, A., Zehloul, O., Yafout, M., Ziraoui, W., Ait Haj Said, A., & Benmoussa, A. (2026). Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, 2026(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1971306
AMA
1.El Bouamri M, Gourmah B, Bayen A, et al. Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential. JOTCSA. 2026;2026(2):1-24. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1971306
Chicago
El Bouamri, Mohamed, Badr Gourmah, Amine Bayen, et al. 2026. “Pyridazin-3(2H)-One Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 2026 (2): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1971306.
EndNote
El Bouamri M, Gourmah B, Bayen A, Zehloul O, Yafout M, Ziraoui W, Ait Haj Said A, Benmoussa A (November 1, 2026) Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 2026 2 1–24.
IEEE
[1]M. El Bouamri et al., “Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential”, JOTCSA, vol. 2026, no. 2, pp. 1–24, Nov. 2026, doi: 10.18596/jotcsa.1971306.
ISNAD
El Bouamri, Mohamed - Gourmah, Badr - Bayen, Amine - Zehloul, Osama - Yafout, Mohamed - Ziraoui, Walid - Ait Haj Said, Amal - Benmoussa, Adnane. “Pyridazin-3(2H)-One Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 2026/2 (November 1, 2026): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1971306.
JAMA
1.El Bouamri M, Gourmah B, Bayen A, Zehloul O, Yafout M, Ziraoui W, Ait Haj Said A, Benmoussa A. Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential. JOTCSA. 2026;2026:1–24.
MLA
El Bouamri, Mohamed, et al. “Pyridazin-3(2H)-One Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, vol. 2026, no. 2, Nov. 2026, pp. 1-24, doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1971306.
Vancouver
1.Mohamed El Bouamri, Badr Gourmah, Amine Bayen, Osama Zehloul, Mohamed Yafout, Walid Ziraoui, Amal Ait Haj Said, Adnane Benmoussa. Pyridazin-3(2H)-one Derivatives: Computational ADME-Tox, Molecular Docking, Drug-Likeness Analysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and Assessment of Their Antitubercular Potential. JOTCSA. 2026 Nov. 1;2026(2):1-24. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1971306