Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Inspired By Life Sciences

Abstract

Nature and life include many mysterious events, behaviors and format within themselves. There is harmony between the environmental conditions, behavior and forms of all living organism. Computer science, especially data and information science, is based on the structure or behavior of living things in the creation of many artificial intelligence algorithms by examining this attitude of life. The rapid progress of the developing artificial intelligence and information technology has increased the data and hidden data in our lives many times and has tried to solve (1).

Artificial intelligence has examined many areas or environments and has developed approaches based on it. Expert systems, artificial neural networks, genetic algorithms, inductive learning, explanation based learning, similarity based learning, common sense information processing, database based reasoning, model based reasoning, rational protection mechanism, distributed artificial intelligence, natural language processing, chaos theory, logic programming are the artificial intelligence algorithms used for these approaches (2). Among artificial intelligence algorithms; The ant colony algorithm imitates the behavior and direction of ants, and artificial neural networks imitates the behavior and functions of neurons in the nervous system and genetic algorithms imitates the theoretical form of genetic science (3, 4). Many algorithms such as these algorithms are based on the vital form and behavior of living things. The purpose of this review is the relations between the mentioned algorithms and the living science are examined.

Keywords

• Artificial Intelligence,Life Sciences,Ant Colony,Artificial Neural Networks,Genetic Algorithm

References

1. 1. Fayyad U, Stolorz P. Data mining and KDD: Promise and challenges. Future generation computer systems. 1997;13(2-3):99–115.
2. 2. Baykal N, Beyan T. Bulanık mantık: uzman sistemler ve denetleyiciler. Bıçaklar Kitabevi; 2004.
3. 3. Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review. 1958;65(6):386.
4. 4. Holland JH. Genetic algorithms. Scientific american. 1992;267(1):66–73.
5. 5. Moschovakis YN. What is an algorithm? Içinde: Mathematics unlimited—2001 and beyond. Springer; 2001. s. 919–936.
6. 6. Turgut H. Veri madenciliği süreci kullanılarak alzheimer hastalığı teşhisine yönelik bir uygulama [Master Thesis]. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2012
7. 7. Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A. Dipartimento Di Elettronica-Politecnico Di Milano. 1991;
8. 8. Parpinelli RS, Lopes HS, Freitas AA. An ant colony algorithm for classification rule discovery. Içinde: Data mining: A heuristic approach. IGI Global; 2002. s. 191–208.

9. 9. Maniezzo V, Gambardella L, Luigi FD. New Optimization Techniques in Engineering. Içinde: An ANTS Heuristic for the Long-Term Car Pooling Problem. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg; 2004. s. 411–430.
10. 10. Gen M, Cheng R, Oren SS. Network design techniques using adapted genetic algorithms. Içinde: Evolutionary Design and Manufacture. Springer; 2000. s. 107–120.
11. 11. Beasley D, Bull DR, Martin RR. An overview of genetic algorithms: Part 1, fundamentals. University computing. 1993;15(2):56–69.
12. 12. Beasley D, Bull DR, Martin RR. A sequential niche technique for multimodal function optimization. Evolutionary computation. 1993;1(2):101–125.
13. 13. Wang S-C. Interdisciplinary computing in Java programming. C. 743. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.