Nanobilim ve Nanoteknoloji Eğitimi Araştırmaları Üzerine Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, bibliyometrik haritalama analizi yoluyla nanobilim ve nanoteknoloji (NNT) eğitimi üzerine araştırmalardaki eğilimler ortaya konmuştur. Önemli sayıdaki makalenin analiz edildiği bu çalışma; yeni araştırmalar için bir rehber oluşturmayı, ilgili alandaki eğilimleri tanımlamayı ve mevcut araştırmaları kıyaslamayı hedeflemektedir. Bibliyomektik analiz için VOSviewer yazılımı kullanılmıştır. Web of Science veri tabanı kapsamındaki hakemli dergilerde 2001 ve 2021 yılları arasında yayımlanan toplam 196 makale bibliyometrik analize tabi tutulmuştur. Analiz sonuçları, incelenen makalelerde nanoteknoloji, aktif öğrenme, 3 ve 4. sınıf lisans öğrencileri, lisansüstü eğitim ve laboratuvar eğitimi kelimelerinin en sık tekrarlanan anahtar kelimeler olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, İsrail, Fransa ve Tayvan’ın NNT eğitimi üzerine en çok yayın yapan ülkeler olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Bununla birlikte çalışma, NNT eğitimi araştırmalarındaki son gelişmelerin ortaya konulması için kapsamlı bir inceleme de sağlamıştır.

Keywords

• nanobilim ve nanoteknoloji
• bibliyometrik analiz
• bibliyometrik haritalama

A Bibliometric Analysis on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Education Research

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the research trends in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NST) Education through a bibliometric mapping analysis. With its focus on NST education and an analysis of a comprehensive number of studies, this study is expected to provide a guide for new studies, identify the trends in the field and compare the existing research on this topic. VOSviewer software was used to examine and visualize bibliometric networks between the research units. The bibliometric analysis included a total of 196 articles published between 2001 and 2021 in peer-reviewed journals covered by the Web of Science database. The results indicated that the most used keywords were nanotechnology, hands-on learning, upper-division undergraduate, graduate education, and laboratory instruction. The most-productive countries in NST education research were the United States, Israel, France, and Taiwan. The results provided a comprehensive review to understand the recent developments in NST education research.

Keywords

• Nanoscience and nanotechnology
• bibliometric analysis
• bibliometric mapping.

References

1. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. Sage Open, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
2. Amaris, Z. N., Freitas, D. N., Mac, K., Gerner, K. T., Nameth, C., & Wheeler, K. E. (2017). Nanoparticle synthesis, characterization, and ecotoxicity: A research-based set of laboratory experiments for a general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(12), 1939-1945. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00369
3. Andres, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
4. Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
5. Bagaria, H. G., Dean, M. R., Nichol, C. A., & Wong, M. S. (2011). Self-assembly and nanotechnology: Real-time, hands-on, and safe experiments for k-12 students. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(5), 609-614. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100598y
6. Bhatt, Y., Ghuman, K., & Dhir, A. (2020). Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260(1), 120988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120988
7. Bhushan, B. (2016). Introduction to Nanotechnology: History, Status, and Importance of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Education. In: Winkelmann, K., Bhushan, B. (eds) Global Perspectives of Nanoscience and Engineering Education. Science Policy Reports. Springer, Cham.
8. Blonder, R. & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 500-516. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20026K

9. Bonnaud, O. & Fesquet, L. (2013). Innovating projects as a pedagogical strategy for the French network for education in microelectronics and nanotechnologies, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education (MSE), Austin, TX
10. Cea, P., Martín, S., Gonzalez-Orive, A., Osorio, H. M., Quintín, P., & Herrer, L. (2016). Nanofabrication and electrochemical characterization of self-assembled monolayers sandwiched between metal nanoparticles and electrode surfaces. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1441−1445. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00826
11. Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive Knowledge Domain Visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 101 (Suppl. 1), 5303-5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100
12. Cheng, P., Yang, Y. C., Chang, S. G., & Kuo, F. R. (2016). 5E Mobile inquiry learning approach for enhancing learning motivation and scientific inquiry ability of university students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(2), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2015.2467352
13. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. C. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
14. Ferreira, M. P., Santos, J. C., de Almeida, M. I. R., & Reis, N. R. (2014). Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980-2010. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2550–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.015
15. Fonash, S. J. (2001). Education and training of the nanotechnology workforce. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011472503007
16. Furlan, P. Y. (2009). Engaging students in early exploration of nanoscience topics using hands-on activities and scanning tunneling microscopy. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(6), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p705
17. Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetric, 3, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009
18. Giakoumettis, D. & Sgouros, S. (2021). Nanotechnology in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Child’s Nervous System, 37, 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-05008-4
19. Gilbert, J. K., & Lin, H. (2013). How might adults learn about new science and technology? The case of nanoscience and nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 3(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.736035
20. Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Course handouts. Retrieved 20 May 2022, from https://www.cin.ufpe.br/~ajhol/futuro/references/01%23_Bibliometrics_Module_KUL_BIBLIOMETRICS%20AS%20A%20RESEARCH%20FIELD.pdf
21. Harzing, A. K. & van der Wal, R. (2009). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00076
22. Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
23. Hingant, B. & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: a review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543
24. Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 41(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v41n03_01
25. Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M. & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1490-1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.771828
26. Jones, M. G., Minogue, J., Tretter, T. R., Negishi, A., & Taylor, R. (2006). Haptic augmentation of science instruction: Does touch matter? Science Education, 90(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20086
27. Krauskopf, E. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the journal of infection and public health: 2008-2016. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 11(2), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.12.011
28. Lati, W., Triampo, D., & Yodyingyong, S. (2019). Exposure to nanoscience and nanotechnology using guided-inquiry-based activities with silica aerogel to promote high school students’ motivation. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1109-1116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00435
29. Lin, S., Chen, J., Shih, K., Wang, K., & Chang, H. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of nanotechnology teaching and professional development: a survey study in Taiwan. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0019
30. Lin, S., Lin, H., & Wu, Y. (2013). Validation and exploration of instruments for assessing public knowledge of and attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 548–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9413-9
31. Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the light of management science – Bibliometric analysis. Procedia Engineering, 182, 412-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.124
32. Malsch, I. (2014). Nano-education from a European perspective: Nano-training for non-R&D jobs. Nanotechnology Review, 3(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2013-0039
33. Moraes, C. 2012. Pop Culture: A Soap Bubble-based Framework for Nanoeducation Outreach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(5), 1–7.
34. Ghattas, N. I. & Carver, J.S. (2012) Integrating nanotechnology into school education: a review of the literature. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.732058
35. Neves, J. (2018). Nanotechnology inclusion in pharmaceutical sciences education in Portugal. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(9), 1073-1080. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6403
36. Olczyk, M. (2016). Bibliometric approach to tracking the concept of international competitiveness. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 945-959. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1236035
37. Paluri, S. L., Edwards, M. L., Lam, N. H., Williams, E. M., Meyerhoefer, A., & Pavel Sizemore, I. E. (2015). Introducing “Green” and “Nongreen” Aspects of noble metal nanoparticle synthesis: An inquiry-based laboratory experiment for chemistry and engineering students. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(2), 350-354. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5004806
38. Pavel, I. E., Alnajjar, K. S., Monahan, J. L., Stahler, A., Hunter, N. E., Weaver, K. M., & Dolson, D. A. (2012). Estimating the analytical and surface enhancement factors in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS): A novel physical chemistry and nanotechnology laboratory experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(2), 286-290. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200156n
39. Perez-Marino, A.M., Blanco, M.C., Buceta, D., & Lopez-Quintela, MA (2019). Using Silver nanoclusters as a new tool in nanotechnology: synthesis and photocorrosion of different shapes of gold nanoparticles. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00573
40. Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In Åstrom, F., Danell, R., Larsen, B., Schneider, J.W. (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, 5, 9-24.
41. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. Royal Society. (2004). Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society.
42. Russo, D.V., Burek, M. J., Iutzi, R.M., Mracek, J.A., & Hesjedal, T. (2011). Development of an electronic nose sensing platform for undergraduate education in nanotechnology. European Journal of Physics, 32(3), 675-686. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/32/3/004
43. Saidi, T. & Sigauke, E. (2017). The use of museum based science centres to expose primary school students in developing countries to abstract and complex concepts of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9692-2
44. Scheufele, D. A. & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2
45. Schönborn, K. J., Höst, G. E., & Lundin Palmerius, K. E. (2015). Measuring understanding of nanoscience and nanotechnology: development and validation of the nano-knowledge instrument (NanoKI). Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 346-354. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00241E
46. Senocak, E. (2014). A survey on nanotechnology in the view of the Turkish public. Science, Technology & Society, 19(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721813514265
47. Shih, M., Feng, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers & Education, 5(1), 955– 967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.004
48. Stevens S., Sutherland L. M., & Krajcik J. S., (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Tosun, C. (2022). Trends of WoS educational research articles in the last half-century. Review of Education, 10(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3328
49. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
50. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.2058
51. Vandermoere, F., Blanchemanche, S., Bieberstein, A., Marette, S., & Roosen, J. (2011). The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain. Public Understandings of Science, 20(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509350139
52. Vogel, R., & Masal, D. (2015). Public leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1165–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895031 Waltman, L., & Noyons, E. (2018). Bibliometrics for research management and research evaluation: A brief introduction. Retrieved 20 May, 2022 from https://www.cwts.nl/pdf/CWTS_bibliometrics.pdf
53. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
54. Wu, S., Guo, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, C., & Ge, G. (2014). Nanoeducation in China: Current status. Nanoparticle Research, 16, 2380-2384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2380-8
55. Yu, H. & Jen, E. (2020). Integrating nanotechnology in the science curriculum for elementary high-ability students in Taiwan: Evidence-based lessons. Roeper Review, 42(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1690078
56. Yueh, H. P. & Sheen, H. J. (2009). Developing experiential learning with a cohort-blended laboratory training in nano-bio engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 712-722.