A Design Studio Workshop Proposal for Comparable Evaluation of the First-Year Architecture and Interior Design Students

Year 2020, , 183 - 187, 20.12.2020

Atlıhan Onat Karacalı

https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.814379

Abstract

Design studios are the key features of design education. These studios are carried on uniquely and distinctly. Both the progress and grade phases are very special. For architecture and interior design disciplines, the design studio consists of an architectural or interior project design. Design studios are now accepted as the main courses of the semester, and other courses serve as the supportive ones. The traditional architectural presentation techniques used in the design studio were technical drawing and physical modeling. In the last three decades, computer-aided methods joined this list. These three main methods are the base of architectural expression and are taught generally in the first year of education. The following workshop proposal aims to figure out whether the order of these methods is effective in the understanding of first-year students. The workshop is going to choose students from both high and low grades of related supportive courses and divide them into equally distributed groups. A sample structural project is going to be given and each group will follow a different permutation of technical drawing, physical modeling, and computer-aided modeling. All works will be graded at both group and individual levels. Finally, there is going to be comparable data in hand to decide both the more correct permutation and the individual student effort independent from the group.

Keywords

design studio, design workshop, technical drawing, architectural modeling, computer-aided design

References

• Drexler, A. (1984). The Architecture of the Beaux-Arts. London: Secker & Warburg.
• Hacihasanoglu, O., (2019), Architectural Design Studio Culture, Journal of Design Studio, V.1, N.1, pp 5-15.
• Ciravoglu, A., (2014), Notes on Architectural Education: An Experimental Approach to Design Studio, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 152.
• Karacali, A.O., Toprak, I., Acırlı, Z., Manav, B., (2020). “İçmimarlık Eğitiminde Konutun Yeri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, 21st Century Housing Discussions Congress, February 14-15, Istanbul Ayvansaray University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture.
• Salama, A., (1995), New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the Design Studio. Raleigh, N.C.: Tailored Text & Unlimited Potential Publishing.
• Toprak, I., Hacihasanoglu, O., (2019), Terms and Concepts on Design Studio in the Research Articles of the 2010s, Journal of Design Studio, V.1, N.2, pp 13-22.