Computational Design Thinking through Cellular Automata: Reflections from Design Studios

Abstract

The current technologies have created a shift from Computer Aided Design to Computational Design in architecture. Computational design allows inquiries into what can be implicit knowledge in traditional design thinking, enables the definition of the mechanisms of design process and formulations of design knowledge and representation, and defines generative and evaluative knowledge. The purpose of this study is to discuss how Cellular Automata can be utilized in design studios to develop computational design thinking, through the examination of Frazer’s and Herr's studio works. After finding matching concepts and comparisons of Cellular Automata methods used in two design studios, the concept of ‘computation’ in Cellular Automaton studies and contributions of using this generative method in design studio will be discussed. In other words, this study will examine the content of Computational Design Thinking through Cellular Automata applications and their contributions to design education. As a result, since Cellular Automata methods are exploratory processes. They enhance seeing, reaching the whole from the parts, noticing the relationships and patterns between the parts and re-inventing them during and after the generative process. For these reasons, Cellular Automata have an important role in the development of computational design thinking in design studios with different concepts and setups.

Keywords

• Cellular Automata
• Computational Design Thinking
• Architectural Design Studio

References

1. Ahlquist, S. & Menges, A. (2011). Computational Design Thinking. London: John Wiley and Sons.
2. Coates, P., & Healy, N., & Lamb, C. & Voon, W.L. (1996). The use of cellular automata to explore bottom up architectonic rules. Eurographics Conference. Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.
3. Frazer, J. (1995). An evolutionary architecture. Architectural Association publications, Themes VII.
4. Frazer, J. (2005). Computing without computers. Architectural Design, 75(2), 34-43.
5. Gu, N., & Singh, V., & Merrick, K. (2010). A framework to integrate generative design techniques for enhancing design automation. In Dave, B., & Li, A. L., & Park, H. J. (eds.), New Frontiers: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA 2010, 127-136. Association for Research in CAADRIA, Hong Kong.
6. Herr, C.M., & Kvan, T. (2007). Adapting cellular automata to support the architectural design process. Automation in Construction. Volume 16, Issue 1, 2007, 61-69.
7. Herr, C. (2008). From form generators to automated diagrams: using cellular automata to support architectural design. (PhD Thesis). Department of Architecture: The University of Hong Kong.
8. Krawczyk, R. J. (2002). Architectural interpretation of cellular automata. International Conference On Generative Art. Milan, Italy, December, 2002

9. Oxman, R. (2008). Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium. Design Studies. Design Studies 29 (2008), Elsevier Ltd. 99-120.
10. Singh, V. (2012). Towards an integrated generative design framework. Design Studies. Vol.33, No.2, March 2012, Elsevier Ltd. 185-207.
11. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
12. Sönmez, N. O., & Ataş, Z. (2016). An alternative design computing and education approach through the concept of computespace. Yapı, 419. (October 2016). 142- 146.
13. Terzidis, C. (2003). Expressive form: a conceptual approach to computational design. Taylor & Francis.
14. Von Neumann, J. (1951). The general and logical theory of automata. Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon Symposium. New York: John Wiley&Sons.
15. Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign: Wolfram Media.