Intuition in the Design Studio: A Perspective on Student’s Creativity and Design Process

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 37 - 48, 20.07.2021

Zeynep Özge Yalçın

https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.886400

Abstract

In the twentieth century, as a result of the transition to a scientific approach in design, intuition lost its validity and design became a rational act. In well-defined problems, the design process could be structured with this scientific approach, however, in an ill-defined structure, rationality needs to be combined with intuition to analyzing the design problems, decisions making and generate solutions by supporting the creativity of design students. In this respect, intuition can assist to strengthen and develop the required abilities during the process. Accordingly, the aim is to understand the role of intuition, how students use it to work creatively through sketches, and conceptual ideas, and the problematic process of transformation into architectural knowledge in the design process. The study carried out a literature review to draw an understanding of the dimensions of intuition and its role in the architectural design studio. The results of the study demonstrate that intuition has a crucial role in the design process. Relatedly, the lack of intuition becomes problematic, due to the non-conveyable character that it cannot find a place for itself in the design education in terms of crits from tutors, and alteration of intuition into concrete representations leads to a gap between intuition and the final project. Furthermore, these problems could be eliminated through the coherent use of two features which are rational approach and intuition. In this respect, intuition, creativity, and rationality is needed to perform together in order to achieve success by deciphering the potentials of the project through the process.

Keywords

Intuition, Creativity, Design studio, Designing process

Thanks

A special thank goes to Prof. Dr. Fehmi Doğan for providing guidance throughout this paper.

References

• Agor, W, H. (1989). Intuition in organizations: leading and managing productively. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
• Archer, B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design studies, 1(1), 17-20.
• Arnheim, R. (1993). “Sketching and the Psychology of Design”, Design Issues, Vol. 9, No. 2, Autumn, pp. 15-19.
• Badke-Schaub, P. & Eris, O. (2014). A theoretical approach to intuition in design: Does design methodology need to account for unconscious processes? In A. Chakrabarti & L. Blessing (Eds.), An anthology of theories and models of design (pp. 353–370). London: Springer.
• Balfour, A. (1981). Captive of Love and Ignorance: Architecture, Education and Practice. Architecture Education Study, 1, pp. 771-801.
• Bastick, T. (2003). Intuition: Evaluating the construct and its impact on creative thinking. Stoneman & Lang.
• Benner, P. (2001). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bergson, H. (1946). The Creative Mind: An introduction to metaphysics. Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications.
• Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and Memory. New York: Zone Books.
• Boden, M. (1994). Dimensions of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Cross, N. G. (1982). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies Vol. 3 No. 4. pp. 221-227
• Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55.
• Csordas, T. (1994). Embodiment and Experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• Dane, E. and Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring Intuition and Its Role in Managerial Decision-Making. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 33-54.
• Dane, E., Rockmann, K. W., Pratt, M. G., (2012). When should I trust my gut? Linking domain expertise to intuitive decision-making effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), pp. 187- 194.
• Do, E.Y. & Gross, M.D. (2001). Thinking with diagrams in architectural design. In: Artificial Intelligence Review, 15: 135-149. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 135-136.
• Dorst, K. & Cross. N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies. Volume 22, Issue 5, September, pp. 425-437
• Durling, D. (1999). Intuition in Design. In Bulletin of 4th Asian Design Conference International Symposium on Design Science 1999, Nagaoka, Japan, October. ISBN 4-9980776-0-0 C3072.
• Durling, D. Cross, N. & Johnson, J. (1996). Personality and Learning Preferences of Students in Design-Related Disciplines IDATER 1996 Conference, Loughborough: Loughborough University. pp.1-6.
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1999). Strategy as Strategic Decision Making, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3
• Faste, H. (2017) Intuition in Design: Reflections on the Iterative Aesthetics of Form, CHI Conference.
• Frank, M. J., O’Reilly, R. C., & Curran, T. (2006). When memory fails, intuition reigns: midazolam enhances implicit inference in humans. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society / APS, 17(8), pp. 700-707.
• Friedman, K. (2003). Theory Construction in Design Research: Criteria, Approaches, and Methods. Design Studies, Vol. 24, Issue 6, pp. 507-522, ISSN 0142-694X.
• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Models, findings, categorizations in A. Glöckner & C. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods. Hove, East Sussex, New York, NY: Psychology Press & Routledge, pp. 1-23.
• Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
• Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The Dialectics of Sketching, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 123- 143
• Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On Visual Design Thinking: The vis kids of architecture, Design Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, April, pp. 158-179.
• Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography unfolding the design process. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Hatchuel, A. (2002). Towards design theory and expandable rationality: The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 3–4.
• Guilford, J. P. (1957). “A Revised Structure of Intellect”, Report of the Psychological Laboratory, University of Southern California, No. 9.
• Hamilton, K. (2019). Evidence, Intuition, and Experiment: Partners in the Design Process. Health Environments Research & Design Journal 2019, Vol. 12(3) 66-71.
• Herbert, D. M. (1993). Architectural Study Drawings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating Intuition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
• Hurst, F. (2000). Architectural Participatory Design Methods, The Graduate School, University of Wisconsin-Stout, A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements.
• Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, fast and slow (1st ed.) New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux pp. 3-22.
• Kheirollahi, M. (2012). The Place and Influence of Intuition in the Creativity of the Architecture Designing Process. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development Vol.1, No.3.
• Klein, G. A. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
• Laughlin, C. (1997). The Nature of Intuition: A Neurophysiological Approach in R. Davis-Floyd & P. S. Arvidson (Eds.), Intuition: The Inside Story: Interdisciplinary Perspectives New York: Routledge, pp. 19-37.
• Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: the design process demystified (3rd ed.) Oxford, Boston: Architectural Press.
• Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: the design process demystified (4th ed.) Oxford, Boston: Architectural Press.
• Ledewitz, S. (1985). Models of Design in Studio Teaching, Journal of Architectural Education, Vol.38, No:2, pp. 2-8.
• Linzey, M. (2001). On the Secondness of Architectural Intuition, Journal of Architectural Education (1984-) Sep. Vol. 55, No. 1 pp. 43-50
• MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The Personality Correlates of Creativity: A Study of American Architects, In Nielson, G.S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Congress on Applied Psychology, 2, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, Denmark. Pp. 11-39.
• Mäkelä, M., & Numkulrat, N. (2011). Making Design Matter in I. Koskinen, T. Härkäsalmi, R. Mazé, B. Matthews, & J. J. Lee (Eds.), Practise-led Design Research, Nordes, pp. 120-128.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception New York: Humanities Press
• Officer, D. R. (2005). The Unexplored Relationship Between Intuition and Innovation, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal. Volume 10(3), Article 10.
• Oh, Y. Ishizaki, S. Gross, M. & Do, E. (2013). A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Design Studies, 34, pp. 302-325.
• Orbey, B. & Erdogdu, G. P. S. (2020). Design process re‐visited in the first-year design studio: between intuition and reasoning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09573-2
• Önal, G.K. Turgut, H. (2017). Cultural schema and design activity in an architectural design studio. Front. Archit. Res. 6, pp. 183-203.
• Pedigo, S. (2005). Educating Intuition by Robin M. Hogarth, Book Summary the Intuitive-Connections Network.
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension (1st ed.) Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday
• Raami, A. (2015). Intuition Unleashed. On the application and development of intuition in the creative process. Aalto University Publication Series, Doctoral Dissertations. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-6108-5
• Reiter-Palmon, R. Mumford, M. D. O’Connor, J. B. & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem Construction and Creativity: The Role of Ability, Cue Consistency, and Active Processing. Creativity Research Journal 10(1):9-23
• Rittel, H. W. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
• Rittel, H. W. & Webber, M. M. (1984). Planning Problems Are Wicked Problems. In Developments in Design Methodology; Cross, N., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, pp. 135–144.
• Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford: Wiley.
• Root-Bernstein, M. & Root-Bernstein, R. (2003) Intuitive tools for innovative thinking in L.V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on innovation,1st ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 113-114.
• Schön. D. A. (1981). Learning a Language, Learning to Design, Architecture Education Study Vol.1. pp. 339-471.
• Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. Laamanen, T.K. Viitala, J. & Mäkelä, M. (2013). Materiality and Emotions in Making. Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 20(3) Retrieved from https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/702
• Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial intelligence, 4(3- 4), 181-201.
• Shapiro, S., & Spence, M. T. (1997). Managerial intuition: A conceptual and operational framework. Business Horizons, 40(1), pp. 63-68.
• Smith, K. S. (2005). Architects’ Drawings, Elsevier, Oxford. pp. 2.
• Soliman, A. M. (2017). Appropriate teaching and learning strategies for the architectural design process in pedagogic design studios. Front. Archit. Res. 6, pp. 204-217.
• Suh, J. & Cho, J.Y. (2018). Analyzing Individual Differences in Creative Performance: A Case Study on the Combinational Ideation Method in the Interior Design Process. J. Inter. Des, 43, 9–23
• Sungur, N. (1992). Yaratici Dusunce. (Creative Thinking) Ozgur Yayin Dagitim, Istanbul
• Tate, K. D. (2007). Art Bound: The Lived Experience of Creativity, University of Southern California, unpublished Ed.D. Dissertation. pp. 71.
• Thomson, P. (2006). Are the Muses Real? Intuitive Inspiration, Possession and Dissociation, in Fisher, J. (ed.), Technologies of Intuition, YYZ Books, Toronto.
• Uffelen, V. C. (2013). The Book of Drawings & Sketches: Architecture, BRAUN, fourth cover.
• Unwin, S. (2007). Analyzing Architecture Through Drawing, Building Research & Information, Vol. 35, No.1, pp. 101-110.
• Utaberta, N. Hassanpour, B. & Zaharim, A. (2010). Redefining Critique Session as an Assessment Tool in Architecture Design Studio Class. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education. ISSN: 1790-1979 287 Issue 9, Vol. 7, pp. 287-298.
• Utaberta, N. Hassanpour, B. Bahar, M.A. & Che Ani, A.I. (2013). A Comprehensive Learning of Architecture Education: Understanding Critique Session as Learning Process and Criteria-based Assessment in the Architecture Design Studio, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 102, ISSN 1877-0428, ISSN 1877-0428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.709 pp. 21-32.