Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 31 - 47, 10.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1628998

Abstract

References

  • Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2009). Design Thinking. Ava Publishing. Assaf, M. A. (2009). Teaching and thinking: a literature review of the teaching of thinking skills. Online Submission.
  • Aşkın, G. (2020). İç Mimarlık Eğitimi Temel Tasarım Sürecinde Yaratıcı Düşüncenin Gelişmesine Yönelik Bir Yöntem Önerisi. . İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
  • Besgen, A. (2015). Teaching/learning strategies through art: painting and basic design education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 420-427.
  • Bielefeld, B., & El Khouli, S. (2010). Adım Adım Tasarım Fikirleri. İstanbul: YEM Yayınevi.
  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.
  • Bulhaz, Ç., & Bulhaz, B. (2019). Tasarım Eğitiminde Stüdyo ve Eleştiri Kültürü. Online Journal of Art and Design, 7(5), 244-259.
  • Canaan, D. (2003). Research to Fuel the Creative Process, . London: Design Research: Methods and Perspectives, Ed. Laurel B., The MIT Press.
  • Cantwell, M. (2019). DEEP design thinking. Deep Design thinking. Retrieved 07 22, 2024, from https://www. deepdesignthinking.com.
  • Choi, H. H., & Kim, M. J. (2017). The effects of analogical and metaphorical reasoning on design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 29–41.
  • Council, D. (2021). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council. Retrieved 07 22, 2024, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/ news-opinion/whatframework-innovation- design-councils-evolveddouble-diamond.
  • Çınar, K., & Çınar, M. (2018). Temel Tasarım. (1 b.). KTO Karatay Üniversitesi Yayınları. Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2016). Design thinking in IS research projects: mindset and toolset perspective. In Design thinking for innovation: Research and practice, 67-83.
  • Dorst, K. (2010). The nature of design thinking. Design Thinking Research Symposium Proceedings, 131-139.
  • Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512-523.
  • Düzenli, T., & Alpak, E. (2016). Peyzaj Mimarlığı Eğitiminde Doğaya Öykünme Yaklaşımının Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi. Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 1(1), 13-21.
  • Er Bıyıklı, N., & Aksoy Gülen, L. (2018). Hayal Gücü Ve Yaratıcılık Kavramlarının Tasarım Sürecine Etkisi. İdil Dergisi, 7(50), 1273-1277.
  • Eraslan Özdağ, S. (2018). Mekân Tasarımında Kavramsal Tema (Konsept) Kavramı. Kocaeli: Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Erman, O., & Yılmaz, N. (2017). Mimari Tasarımda Konsept ve Bağlam İlişkisi Üzerine. TMD Uluslararası Hakemli Tasarım ve Mimarlık Dergisi, 10, 96-115.
  • Eyüboğlu Erşen, A. (2018). Mimarlik ve Tasarim Eğitimi Üzerine. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 8(2), 64-72.
  • Garip, E., & Garip, S. B. (2012). İç Mimarlık Eğitiminde Yaratıcılık Ve Yarışmalar. İÇMEK / İçmimarlık Eğitimi 2. Ulusal Kongresi, 24-33. İstanbul.
  • Girgin, D. (2020). 21. Yüzyılın Öğrenme Deneyimi: Öğretmenlerin Tasarım Odaklı Düşünme Eğitimine İlişkin Görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(226), 53-91.
  • Hasol, D. (1995). Ansiklopedik Mimarlık Sözlüğü (5 ed.). İstanbul: Yem Yayınevi. Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer, 33-46.
  • Liedtka, J. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Design Thinking in Action. Darden Working Paper Series.
  • Lindberg, T., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2010). Evolving discourses on design thinking: How design cognition inspires meta- disciplinary creative collaboration. Technoetic Arts A Journal of Speculative Research, 8(1), 31–37.
  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2 ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Noraslı, M. (2023). Via Design Focused Thinking Model, Surface Design Specific to Corridors Used By Children with Cerebral Palsy. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 11(2), 960-978.
  • Noraslı, M., & Çınar, H. (2024). Analysing Corporate Identity in Office Design With a Case Study Model. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (54), 357-370. Onat, E. (2006). Mimarlığa Yolculuk,. İstanbul: YEM Yayınevi.
  • Onur, D., & Zorlu, T. (2017). Yaratıcılık kavramı ile ilişkili kuramsal yaklaşımlar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 1535-1552.
  • Onur, D., & Zorlu, T. (2018). Tasarım eğitiminde duyusal farkındalık ve yaratıcılık ilişkisi üzerine. METU JFA., 35(2), 89-118.
  • Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.
  • Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: Teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91. Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking-A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36 (100637).
  • Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Weinberg, U. (2009). Design Thinking. Landsberg am Lech: Mi-Fachverlag.
  • Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010).
  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). Design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82, 330–348.
  • Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 45-105.
  • Stanford d.school ile University Innovation Fellowship Programı. (n.d.). Retrieved 07 09, 2024, from https://girisimcilik.bogazici.edu.tr/ stanford-dschool-ile-university-innovation- fellowship-program.
  • Sungur, M., & Akçaova, A. (2024). Experiential Learning Method in Interior Architecture Education, Stairs Example, a Vertical Circulation Element. Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art & Communication, 14(4), 986-996.
  • The Interaction Design Foundation [IDF]. 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. Interaction Design Foundation. (2020). Retrieved 07 09, 2024 from https:// www.interaction-design.org/literature article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process.
  • Tunalı, İ. (2021). Tasarım Felsefesi. Ankara: Fol Kitap.
  • Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. Yurtgün, H., & Çınar, H. (2023). A new approach to the space design process in the interior architecture basic design studio. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(1), 290-300.

Designing a Space for Documentary Filmmakers with Design Thinking Method

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 31 - 47, 10.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1628998

Abstract

Design education is based on the act of designing. Design education is based on the process, not the outcome. In this process-focused education, it is necessary to use methods that can generate creative and innovative solutions. Design thinking is one such method. This method is also used in spatial design, in addition to music, literature, science and education. In this study the design thinking method was used. This method aims to put the student at the centre of the process by increasing the creativity and abstract thinking skills of students taking studio education. The study was conducted with 10 students taking the studio course. The students were given the topic "Space Design for Documentary Filmmakers". The study was carried out in five stages over a period of 12 weeks: empathising, defining, generating ideas, developing prototypes and testing. The students' stage of development in the process was monitored through the resulting work. It was ensured that the students developed different perspectives throughout the process, without disengaging from the work. The importance of creating a concept for the design of space and the ability to think in three dimensions in accordance with the concept has been understood in design education. Based on this study, it is believed that the use of methods that enhance the creative thinking of those receiving design education will provide different perspectives and develop creative three-dimensional thinking.

References

  • Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2009). Design Thinking. Ava Publishing. Assaf, M. A. (2009). Teaching and thinking: a literature review of the teaching of thinking skills. Online Submission.
  • Aşkın, G. (2020). İç Mimarlık Eğitimi Temel Tasarım Sürecinde Yaratıcı Düşüncenin Gelişmesine Yönelik Bir Yöntem Önerisi. . İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi.
  • Besgen, A. (2015). Teaching/learning strategies through art: painting and basic design education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 420-427.
  • Bielefeld, B., & El Khouli, S. (2010). Adım Adım Tasarım Fikirleri. İstanbul: YEM Yayınevi.
  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.
  • Bulhaz, Ç., & Bulhaz, B. (2019). Tasarım Eğitiminde Stüdyo ve Eleştiri Kültürü. Online Journal of Art and Design, 7(5), 244-259.
  • Canaan, D. (2003). Research to Fuel the Creative Process, . London: Design Research: Methods and Perspectives, Ed. Laurel B., The MIT Press.
  • Cantwell, M. (2019). DEEP design thinking. Deep Design thinking. Retrieved 07 22, 2024, from https://www. deepdesignthinking.com.
  • Choi, H. H., & Kim, M. J. (2017). The effects of analogical and metaphorical reasoning on design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 29–41.
  • Council, D. (2021). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council. Retrieved 07 22, 2024, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/ news-opinion/whatframework-innovation- design-councils-evolveddouble-diamond.
  • Çınar, K., & Çınar, M. (2018). Temel Tasarım. (1 b.). KTO Karatay Üniversitesi Yayınları. Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2016). Design thinking in IS research projects: mindset and toolset perspective. In Design thinking for innovation: Research and practice, 67-83.
  • Dorst, K. (2010). The nature of design thinking. Design Thinking Research Symposium Proceedings, 131-139.
  • Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512-523.
  • Düzenli, T., & Alpak, E. (2016). Peyzaj Mimarlığı Eğitiminde Doğaya Öykünme Yaklaşımının Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi. Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 1(1), 13-21.
  • Er Bıyıklı, N., & Aksoy Gülen, L. (2018). Hayal Gücü Ve Yaratıcılık Kavramlarının Tasarım Sürecine Etkisi. İdil Dergisi, 7(50), 1273-1277.
  • Eraslan Özdağ, S. (2018). Mekân Tasarımında Kavramsal Tema (Konsept) Kavramı. Kocaeli: Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Erman, O., & Yılmaz, N. (2017). Mimari Tasarımda Konsept ve Bağlam İlişkisi Üzerine. TMD Uluslararası Hakemli Tasarım ve Mimarlık Dergisi, 10, 96-115.
  • Eyüboğlu Erşen, A. (2018). Mimarlik ve Tasarim Eğitimi Üzerine. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 8(2), 64-72.
  • Garip, E., & Garip, S. B. (2012). İç Mimarlık Eğitiminde Yaratıcılık Ve Yarışmalar. İÇMEK / İçmimarlık Eğitimi 2. Ulusal Kongresi, 24-33. İstanbul.
  • Girgin, D. (2020). 21. Yüzyılın Öğrenme Deneyimi: Öğretmenlerin Tasarım Odaklı Düşünme Eğitimine İlişkin Görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(226), 53-91.
  • Hasol, D. (1995). Ansiklopedik Mimarlık Sözlüğü (5 ed.). İstanbul: Yem Yayınevi. Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer, 33-46.
  • Liedtka, J. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Design Thinking in Action. Darden Working Paper Series.
  • Lindberg, T., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2010). Evolving discourses on design thinking: How design cognition inspires meta- disciplinary creative collaboration. Technoetic Arts A Journal of Speculative Research, 8(1), 31–37.
  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2 ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Noraslı, M. (2023). Via Design Focused Thinking Model, Surface Design Specific to Corridors Used By Children with Cerebral Palsy. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 11(2), 960-978.
  • Noraslı, M., & Çınar, H. (2024). Analysing Corporate Identity in Office Design With a Case Study Model. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (54), 357-370. Onat, E. (2006). Mimarlığa Yolculuk,. İstanbul: YEM Yayınevi.
  • Onur, D., & Zorlu, T. (2017). Yaratıcılık kavramı ile ilişkili kuramsal yaklaşımlar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 1535-1552.
  • Onur, D., & Zorlu, T. (2018). Tasarım eğitiminde duyusal farkındalık ve yaratıcılık ilişkisi üzerine. METU JFA., 35(2), 89-118.
  • Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.
  • Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: Teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91. Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking-A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36 (100637).
  • Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Weinberg, U. (2009). Design Thinking. Landsberg am Lech: Mi-Fachverlag.
  • Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010).
  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). Design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82, 330–348.
  • Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 45-105.
  • Stanford d.school ile University Innovation Fellowship Programı. (n.d.). Retrieved 07 09, 2024, from https://girisimcilik.bogazici.edu.tr/ stanford-dschool-ile-university-innovation- fellowship-program.
  • Sungur, M., & Akçaova, A. (2024). Experiential Learning Method in Interior Architecture Education, Stairs Example, a Vertical Circulation Element. Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art & Communication, 14(4), 986-996.
  • The Interaction Design Foundation [IDF]. 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. Interaction Design Foundation. (2020). Retrieved 07 09, 2024 from https:// www.interaction-design.org/literature article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process.
  • Tunalı, İ. (2021). Tasarım Felsefesi. Ankara: Fol Kitap.
  • Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. Yurtgün, H., & Çınar, H. (2023). A new approach to the space design process in the interior architecture basic design studio. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(1), 290-300.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Interior Architecture
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Tuba Arkan Demirörs 0000-0003-3278-9045

Ayşe Tüzün Güner 0000-0003-3016-1502

Selin Kılıç Dede 0000-0001-8204-7651

Early Pub Date July 10, 2025
Publication Date July 10, 2025
Submission Date January 29, 2025
Acceptance Date February 7, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Arkan Demirörs, T., Tüzün Güner, A., & Kılıç Dede, S. (2025). Designing a Space for Documentary Filmmakers with Design Thinking Method. Journal of Design Studio, 7(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1628998

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The articles published in Journal of Design Studio had been similarity checked by intihal.net 

QmgB3Bhm.jpg




CALL FOR ARTICLES

Journal of Design Studio call for research papers on studios in all disciplines. Please submit your article by using Dergipark online submission system.