Moderating the Soft Storey Impact in Multi-Storey Buildings: A Comparative Seismic Investigation

Year 2024, , 355 - 364, 31.12.2024

Shabla K , K.i. Praseeda Chıtaranjan Pany

https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1607472

Abstract

A storey with lateral stiffness less than 70% of the storey above or less than 80% of the average stiffness of the three storeys above is considered a soft storey. Ground-floor open-air buildings are frequently used for parking, particularly in metropolitan settings with considerable space limits. Soft-story buildings with irregular stiffness tend to collapse more than conventional buildings. The study's main goal was to understand better the soft storey effect in multi-storey structures and how to mitigate it using strategies such as adding shear walls, bracings, viscous dampers, and stiffer columns. A G+14 storey building finite element model (FEM) has been established via ETABS software and performed Response Spectrum Analysis at three seismic zones-III, IV and V. To determine the best method for reducing the soft storey effect in buildings, an analysis is conducted taking into account many parameters, including storey shear, stiffness, storey drift, and storey displacement for the entire structure, as well as the responses at the soft storey level for different configurations. According to the findings, adding a shear wall to a soft-storey building increases storey shear while reducing maximum displacement and storey drift. The first floor of the structure (soft storey) exhibits the most significant reduction in displacement (79.29%) and storey drift (79.3%) when shear walls are incorporated at the corners. There is also a 33.11% increase in base shear at the first story level, and the structure's stiffness increases by 6.5 times compared to a soft storey building. Adding a shear wall reduces the soft storey building's maximum displacement and storey drift by 25.27% and 59.28%, respectively. The soft storey building's maximum storey shear rises by 33.38%. Regarding seismic performance, a soft-storey building with a shear wall performs better than other soft-storey mitigation techniques.

Keywords

Bracings, response spectrum analysis, shear wall, soft storey, stiffer columns, viscous damper

References

• 1. Ahmer, K., & Chouka, S. S. (2020). Seismic performance evaluation of multi-storey building having soft storey with different location of shear walls. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(11), 50-55. [CrossRef]
• 2. Sreadha, A. R., Pany, C., & Varkey, M. V. (2020). A review on seismic retrofit of beam-column joints. International Journal of Modern Trends in Science and Technology, 6(9), 80-93. [CrossRef]
• 3. Sreadha, A. R., & Pany, C. (2020). Seismic study of multistorey building using floating column. International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering, 6(9), 6-11. [CrossRef]
• 4. Lu, X., Xie, L., Guan, H., Huang, Y., & Lu, X. (2015). A shear wall element for nonlinear seismic analysis of super-tall buildings using OpenSees. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 98, 14-25. [CrossRef]
• 5. Khudhair, S. Y. (2019). The suitable location for shearing walls on soft storey in high rise buildings to increase its stiffness. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 2096-2105.
• 6. Kiran, S., Ramtekkar, G. D., & Titiksh, A. (2017). Comparative study for mitigating the soft storey effect in multi-storey buildings using different structural arrangements. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(3), 520-531.
• 7. Dheekshith, K., & Naveen, K. M. S. (2018). Comparative study on seismic analysis of two RC buildings with irregularities under varying seismic zones. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(7), 81-88.
• 8. Gairola, P., & Dhyani, S. (2019). Seismic analysis of open soft storey building for different models. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 8(5), 124-132.
• 9. Ghate, N. A., & Siddh, S. P. (2018). Seismic demand of soft storey building and its strengthening for seismic resistance. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(5), 602-610.
• 10. Shaji, A., Binu, A., Divakaran, D., & Sasidharan, A. (2019). Seismic analysis of soft storey buildings. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research, 8(3), 10.
• 11. Mazza, F., Mazza, M., & Vulcano, A. (2018). Base-isolation systems for the seismic retrofitting of r.c. framed buildings with soft-storey subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 109, 209-221. [CrossRef]
• 12. Sharma, P., Rajendra, S., & Vanisree, C. N. (2016). Comparative study on effects of regular and irregular structures subjected to lateral loading by equivalent static method and response spectrum method. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Science, 2(5), 263-268.
• 13. Halde, V. V., & Deshmukh, A. H. (2015). Review on behavior of soft storey in building. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(8), 327-329.
• 14. Takeuchi, T., Wada, A., Matsui, R., Sitler, B., Lin, P., Sutcu, F., Sakata, H., & Qu, Z. (2017). Buckling-restrained braces and applications. Japan Society of Seismic Isolation.
• 15. Kannan, S. S. (2023). Seismic analysis of soft storey building in earthquake zones. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1130(1), 012023. [CrossRef]
• 16. Pesaralanka, V., Challagulla, S. P., Vicencio, F., Chandra Babu, P. S., Hossain, I., Jameel, M., & Ramakrishna, U. (2023). Influence of a soft story on the seismic response of non-structural components. Sustainability, 15(4), 2860. [CrossRef]
• 17. Chanumolu, M., & Anthugari, V. (2022). Dynamic performance of soft-storey structures with gap elements at beam-column joints. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52, 622-631. [CrossRef]
• 18. Qambrani, M. M., Mirza, F., & Habib, M. (2023). Comparative seismic response analysis of a multi-storey building with and without base isolators under high magnitude earthquake. Engineering Proceedings, 44(1), 6. [CrossRef]
• 19. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2016). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. IS 1893: 2016 Part 1.