Investigation of glass fiber reinforced aluminum honeycomb panel repair performance according to aviation standards

Abstract

Aluminum honeycomb structures are widely used in aviation and aerospace engineering designs due to their high strength/density properties. Although they are resistant to atmospheric conditions and acceptable impacts, they can suffer from corrosion and mechanical damage in some cases. This damage that occurs over time can affect the structural integrity and maintenance-repair process, which in turn can affect the safety and service life of this material. In this study, a different repair technique was tried by giving artificial damage to aluminum honeycomb structures. Repair procedures were carried out in accordance with the maintenance protocols of the manufacturing companies in order to restore the original strength properties of the material. After the repair, various non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, such as visual inspection and ultrasonic testing, were employed to inspect for discontinuities. A bending test was subsequently conducted to evaluate the material's strength, and the results were analyzed. The bending test results indicate that the repaired structures exhibited structural integrity close to their pre-damage state. The results of this study demonstrate that the repaired aluminum honeycomb structures achieved strength levels comparable to the original, undamaged material, meeting aviation industry standards. This highlights the effectiveness and reliability of the developed repair methods for ensuring safety and functionality in aerospace applications.

Keywords

• Honeycomb composite
• Aviation material
• Glass-fibre reinforced
• Aluminum honeycomb.

References

1. [1] M. Mrazova, “Advanced composite materials of the future in aerospace industry.” Incas Bulletin 5, no. 3, 6 September 2013: 139–50. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2013.5.3.14.
2. [2] B. Parveez et al,. “Scientific advancements in composite materials for aircraft applications: A review.” Polymers 14, no. 22, 18 November 2022: 5007. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14225007.
3. [3] M. Kalanchiam and M. Chinnasamy. “Advantages of Composite Materials in Aircraft Structure.” World Academy of Science, Vol:6, No:11, 2012.
4. [4] P. D. Mangalgiri, “Composite materials for aerospace applications.” Bulletin of Materials Science 22, no. 3, May 1999: 657–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749982.
5. [5] S. Pantelakis, and K. I. Tserpes, “Adhesive bonding of composite aircraft structures: Challenges and recent developments’. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy 57, no. 1, January 2014: 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5274-3.
6. [6] M. Préau and P. Hubert, “Bonded repairs of honeycomb sandwich structures:Process monitoring and quality assessment.” 20th International Conference on Composite Materials Copenhagen, 19-24th July 2015.
7. [7] C. Soutis, “Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 41, no. 2, February 2005: 143–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004.
8. [8] Z. Wang et al., “On the influence of structural defects for honeycomb structure.” Composites Part B: Engineering 142, June 2018: 183–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.015.

9. [9] A. J. Timmis et al., “Environmental impact assessment of aviation emission reduction through the implementation of composite materials.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20, no. 2, February 2015: 233–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0824-0.
10. [10] R. A. Witik et al., “Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components.” Journal of Cleaner Production 29–30, July 2012: 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.028
11. [11] Y. F. Khalil, “Eco-efficient lightweight carbon-fiber reinforced polymer for environmentally greener commercial aviation industry.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 12, October 2017: 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.05.004.
12. [12] M.H. Hassan et al., “A review on the manufacturing defects of complex-shaped laminate in aircraft composite structures.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91, no. 9–12, August 2017: 4081–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0096-5.
13. [13] M. K. Hagnell et al., “From aviation to automotive a study on material selection and its implication on cost and weight efficient structural composite and sandwich design.” Heliyon 6, no. 3, March 2020: e03716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03716.
14. [14] A. Anderson, C. Longo and P. Teufel, “New composite design and manudacturing methods for general aviation aircraft structures.” Toyota Aviation Business Development Office Toyota Motor Sales, USA Inc. 19001 South Western Avenue, MS32 Torrance, CA 90509.
15. [15] V. Birman and G. A. Kardomateas, “Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures.” Composites Part B: Engineering 142, June 2018: 221–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027.
16. [16] X. Wei et al., “New advances in fiber-reinforced composite honeycomb materials.” Science China Technological Sciences 63, no. 8, August 2020: 1348–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1650-9.
17. [17] N. Takeda et al., “Smart composite sandwich structures for future aerospace application - damage detection and suppression-: A review.” Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering 1, no. 1, 2007: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1299/jmmp.1.3.
18. [18] X. Zhao et al., “Composite Aircraft Components Maintenance Cost Analysis.” Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, Delft, The Netherlands, 2629 HS.
19. [19] B. He et al., “Damage resistance of honeycomb sandwich composites under low-energy impact.” Applied Composite Materials, 29 October 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-024-10278-1.
20. [20] B. Castanie et al., “Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications.” Composites Part C: Open Access, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004
21. [21] E. Tunca and H. Kafalı, “Compression and three-point bending analyzes of aerospace sandwich composites produced with polymeric core materials using ansys.” European Journal of Science and Technology, (31), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1012658.
22. [22] I. Bozkurt, “Investigation of low velocity impact behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with gfrp face sheets by finite element method.” Düzce University Journal of Science & Technology, 2024, 2159-2184. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1477434.
23. [23] H. A. Hegazi and A. H. Mokhtar, “Optimum design of hexagonal cellular structures under thermal and mechanical loads.” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 9 Issue 06, June-2020.
24. [24] A. Kausar et al., “State of the art of sandwich composite structures: manufacturing to high performance applications.” J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030102.